You have to be patient, yet persistent. And remember, "no" doesn't mean "no." It just means "not yet."
Well, you're right about that. That's how we got Altar Girls, Lay "Ministers" of Holy Communion, Communion in the hand, and, in just a few more weeks, divorced and "remarried" "Catholics" officially permitted to receive Holy Communion.
What next? Open Sodomites officially permitted to receive Holy Communion? Woman Cadinals?
No (not yet).
Pardon me if I don't have "patience" to wait for the Modernist method of wearing down Church infrastructure until I finally get my way. That's how a spoiled child or a nagging wife operates - not a faithful Catholic who desires what Immemororial Tradition and St. Pius V's Quo Primum established in perpetuity as the One and Only Mass of the Latin Rite of the Roman Catholic Church.
Henry VIII wanted the Church to allow him to divorce his first wife so that he could marry a younger and supposedly more beautiful woman and the Church refused to give him an annulment he started his own church, which incidently doesn't have a valid celebration of the Holy Mass.
So what's your point? That he should have had the patience to wait a few centuries for the Synod against the Family 2015 to come along and grant him his wish?
You're the one saying "no" means "not yet," Poche. In my household "no" means "no." Our Lord told us to let our "no" be "no" and our "yes" "yes."
The Church is held to no less a standard. She already said "Yes" definitively to the TLM and "No" to any attempts to replace it. It is to that "Yes" and "No" that I will hold.
Topic: Traditional Catholic American Indians (Native Americans) (Read 7204 times)