What is at issue is not Catholics vs "nαzιs".  There were the German people and their nation Germany.
There were non-Catholics and many Catholics. They were all German citizens, and many of them supporters and members of the National Socialist movement which was a legitimate response to the injustice and degradation which was forced upon that nation.

No one else came to that unfortunate country's defense after WWI. We heard little if anything from the Vatican during that period. There was no encyclical or outcry against the great injustice at Versailles which was both dominated and demanded by an over repesented Jєωιѕн minority. There was no direction as to how German Catholics were to respond or live within the horrors and perversities of Wiemar Germany.

As I understand it, the Bishop who was most responsible for Mit Brenner had conflicted with the NS government, was himself a stong sympathiser with the Jews and saw their treatment  as a violation against God's chosen people.

What has always puzzled me is why there was never any official Catholic response to the almost complete destruction of the European Catholic infrastucture by Allied bombing and shelling in many countries?
Nor were there any docuмents written against the completely immoral war aims and methods employed by the Allies. Huge numbers of Catholics in Germany's south were incinerated and suffered inhumane privations by continual attacks and bombing of civilian areas, and yet the Vatican came to the defense of a small and subversive minority in Germany rather than that of its own co-religionists. Were global politics involved at this point? Can there be any doubt?
Did Catholics in the west and the Allied services not deserve a similar encyclical warning them against the policies and tactics of their respective countries and services that were totally un-Catholic and even anti-Christian.

Boy, that's a whole separate topic.

Pope Pius XII's tenure was filled with ambiguities.

He knew the Germans and the communist threat better than anyone but was virtually silent on "Uncle Joe" rat Stalin.

Instead, he spent a lot of energy making fake passports for the jews and was given $1 million by Golda Meier afterwards.

And how about the Fatima Consecration, which he knew how to execute, but failed to do so?

And his handling of Montini after he was caught negotiating with the Russians and revealing where Catholic clerics were in the country.




Yep, Pope Pacelli is whole separate, mega-topic.

I amazes me how Jews twist the topics in an attempt to follow an agenda. This thread has been seriously derailed.
JPAUL and LeDeg: Thank you for your spot on contribution to this subversive natured thread..

This is so full of damage control propaganda it's pathetic. Hitler was on the payroll of the Masons? And your citing Stalinist docuмents as sources?  

Debunk it if you can  

Maybe this article for starters for anyone that may be interested...

Click title below...

How Hitler Defied the International Bankers

We're digressing. This is the last post, that stayed "on topic".  


To respond to Alaric's comments:  What did Col von Stauffenberg know about Hitler... and when did he know it?

In the  Stalinist "Red Symphony" transcripts, we learned Hitler was funded by the Rothschild elites.  
After national recovery, around 1938, when Hitler dared to print money, he became a "Bonapartist", a marked man, as they say.

WWII showed an incredible level of rabbinic sophistication in managing the "international show business".  
FDR, Churchill, Stalin, Hitler were all on the ʝʊdɛօ-masonic payroll.

But it is hard to discern reality, when the yids are running the show?  

So what did Colonel von Stauffenberg really know about the ʝʊdɛօ-masonic theater?

For example, there's a credible accusation that FDR was found dead in Georgia with a gunshot wound to the head.
The story was effectively covered-up, to claim he had a stroke.

But in the initial story, leaked, said it was a ѕυιcιdє.   A closed room gunshot, meant it could as well have been an assassin.  


FDR's closed casket covered-up the head shot
So, the warning that St. Maximilian Kolbe gave to the Freemasons was very accurate and relevant.  

In the 1930's he wrote to tell them based on the Protocols, the jews would annihilate them when the time was right.

If Col. von Stauffenberg had succeeded, at least Germany could have sued for peace, instead of undergoing total destruction.