My views on Pius XI and Pius XII, Mit and the events leading up to WWII and eventually the demise of the Church are based on historical facts. I do not allow ultramontanism to get in the way, much like R&R's don't let Vatican II and all of the subsequent events after it to get in the way of dismissing anything the recognized hierarchy says or does.
My views go much further back than these events. But, that's another story.

  but the problem was that Hitler and company separated themselves from the the teachings of Christ and His Church in their pursuit of a policy of Imperialistic race hatred against the Jєωιѕн people. If you don't have a hard copy it can be viewed on line at https://archive.org/details/ThePlotAgainstTheChurch_192

This is a response to that quoted how exactly?

"Google it", or "look it up yourself", is BS.

However, if that's the standard you want to use, then you won't mind if people make allegations and insinuation about you while you're not about to defend yourself, and then serve up some weak sauce, "google it" or "read a book" response that doesn't appear to have any relevance, right?

"Honorable"

Whatever.

YOu might try the dismissive, "Antisemite" like "defeater" of "Ultramontane"; it seems to meet the same high standards of rigor and virtue...oh yeah, and "honor".

To heck with it, let's just emulate that vaunted German "efficiency" and work ethic, become formal Protestants, call it a day, then we can just make crap up and say we're "inspired".
At least that part would be true, God forbid it, because it wouldn't be HIm doing the inspiring.

Sorry if I offended you or anyone else on this forum DZ PLEASE.  I never intended to.

Well said. This pretty much sums it up. The marranos who infiltrated the Church granted the apostates their V2.
YES MARRANOS..
Subversive, meek on the outside but pure putrescence on the inside.
"You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and he stood not in the truth; because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof.
But if I say the truth, you believe me not.
Which of you shall convince me of sin? If I say the truth to you, why do you not believe me?"

http://newensign.christsassembly.com/A%20History%20of%20The%20Marranos.pdf


Montini, (anti-pope)
Baum (Drafted Nostrae aetate, head peritus for Unitatis Redintegratio and Dignitatis Humanae)

Baum (Drafted Nostrae aetate, head peritus for Unitatis Redintegratio and Dignitatis Humanae)

Baum attended the Second Vatican Council (1962-65) as a peritus, or theological expert. He vigorously opposed Catholic teaching on a range of issues, including contraception, priestly celibacy, and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity.

He was one of the most outspoken critics of Pope Paul VI's 1968 condemnation of contraception in the encyclical Humanae Vitae, even to the point of rallying opposition to the teaching.

Baum played no small part in the outcome of the Canadian bishops adopting a position of open dissent from Humanae Vitae two months after its release.

In their September 27, 1968, controversial “Winnipeg Statement,” the bishops opened a door for couples to use contraception, stating that if a couple has "tried sincerely but without success to pursue a line of conduct in keeping with the given directives, they may be safely assured that, whoever honestly chooses that course which seems right to him does so in good conscience."

Monsignor Vincent Foy, who was known until his death as the foremost expert on the Canadian bishops’ dissent in Winnipeg, wrote that Baum’s influence over the bishops’ proceedings at that time cast a “black shadow.”

“If it had not been for the black shadow of Baum over Winnipeg, his influence over some Bishops, the Canadian theological establishment and pressure groups, the Winnipeg Statement of the Canadian Bishops on Humanae Vitae would not have refused to endorse the teaching of the encyclical as it did,” he wrote.

Baum revealed in a book published this year that he secretly led an active ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ life for decades.

In The Oil Has Not Run Dry: The Story of My Theological Pathway, Baum states that he chose to keep his ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity a secret while appearing to be a faithful priest so he could continue to exert his influence within the Catholic Church.

“I did not profess my own ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity in public because such an act of honesty would have reduced my influence as a critical theologian,” he wrote.

“I was eager to be heard as a theologian trusting in God as salvator mundi (Savior of the world) and committed to social justice, liberation theology, and global solidarity,” he added.

In his book, Baum details his ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ experiences.

“I was 40 years old when I had my first sɛҳuąƖ encounter with a man. I met him in a restaurant in London. This was exciting and at the same time disappointing, for I knew what love was and what I really wanted was to share my life with a partner.”

He wrote that he considered resigning from the priesthood but did not go through with the formality, rather choosing to announce it in the national newspaper. He later married a divorced ex-nun who he says “did not mind that, when we moved to Montreal in 1986, I met Normand, a former priest, with whom I fell in love.” Normand, he wrote, “is gαy and welcomed my sɛҳuąƖ embrace.”

Noted Toronto Catholic priest and Vatican consultant Fr. Thomas Rosica hosted a controversial appearance of Baum at the Catholic Newman Centre of the University of Toronto in 1996 and in 2012 made him a featured guest on his Canadian Catholic TV station Salt and Light Television.
During the Salt and Light interview, Fr. Rosica professed to having known Baum for a long time and praised him for his theology.

“I’ve certainly admired very much your theology, your writings but also your love of the Church, your love of Christ, and you helped to keep alive not only the spirit of the Second Vatican Council but also the authentic teaching of the Council,” Fr. Rosica said of Baum.
“You remain a faithful, deeply devoted Catholic, love Jesus, the Church, the Eucharist,” he added.

Monsignor Foy, on the other hand, considered Baum as having “done more than any person to harm the Church in Canada.”