My understanding is that Hitler was hated by all his generals and he was responsible for military policies that cost many German lives. He was sleeping when D-Day got under way and everyone was afraid to wake him because he was such a vindictive bastard. So they could not get authorization to move Panzer divisions into place. He basically liquidated Rommel. He was totally inept. And yet he would not negotiate peace. If ever there was cause to put down a rabid dog, this was it. A Catholic bishop approved. Stauffenberg may not be a hero but I believe he acted out of a love for his country. I don't see how a successful assassination of Hitler would have done more harm to Germany than what Hitler did in the final year of the war. Good riddance to that cowardly pervert.
Hitler was not hated by all of his generals. That is false. He was not inept and made many military decisions based upon the advice of his military staff. Some he made unilaterally or with his close circle.
Stauffenberg was at best disloyal. It was not for him to decide the military policy for his superiors but to carry them out or
refuse to so according to his conscience.
Planting a bomb in a crowded tent of his countrymen was cowardly, and and not the act of a Catholic conscience, and their is also the issue of collaboration with the allies which would make him a traitor and place him in league with the Communists and Masons. That is who would have benefitted from Hitles death, and to the detriment of the German people. The post war record attests to this with millions dying
after the end of the war.
There were over twenty peace proposals made by his government, both before and during the war. One even included the offer to return to the pre-war boundaries. All were rejected by the Allies. the claim that he would not negotiate is not in accordance with the facts and therefore false.
Poll
