Obviously it's not the real VoxClamantis. Read his/her posts. It's filled with sarcasm mocking Vox.

I say let him/her stay.

Trolling in the form of mocking Vox should be an exception to the rule.

Anyway, it's Vetus Ordo. The FE source I talked to also said that Vetus has a past history of pretending to be other people and is mad at the real Vox for banning him so he's apparently mocking Vox to get back at her. Why he's doing it on CatholicInfo, I have no idea. But anyway Vetus, you've been exposed. Be a man and admit it's you instead of hiding behind that fake internet persona.

I don't know anything about Vox or Fisheaters, but this pseudo-Vox has some kind of agenda that looks like a white-power kind of thing, and is trying to use feeble reverse psychology.  

There is a lot of it going around.  And I knew Tele, who is clearly affected, would fall for all this stuff a long time ago.  It is almost as if the devil sends certain people onto this site to flatter the egos of certain members and lead them astray.  The devil like a roaring lion goes about seeking whom he will devour.

 Tele is weak and wounded, a sitting duck for all kinds of lies, which he has begun to swallow.  I know how the devil works.  Tele, due to his pride, instead of seeking out the truth, seeks out those who will flatter him, and guess who is ready and willing to provide?   Eamon did the same thing.  He was so susceptible to flattery it was disturbing, he only wanted to listen to those who treated him like some kind of hero.

I can see these flaws a mile away.  You have to live for God and for truth alone, not for your own brittle ego.

Why would I have to be a seer to figure out how you think, when I have your own words?  Being perceptive is not based on mind-reading, only in drawing conclusions based on factual indications, like a detective.

You're right, you've had those views, but they were kind of bubbling under the surface before.  Now you are more vocal about them and are going further in that direction, which is about the deadest of dead ends imaginable.

Telesphorus said:  

I suppose you've never heard of the French Gobineau either, if you want to talk about racialism as some sort of exclusively anglo-german perspective.  It's really silly.

I'm not a racialist btw.  That doesn't mean I'm going to play the cultural marxist game of branding people as nαzιs for standing up to quasi-marxists who hate white Americans.

See my post in the other Vox thread about "websites he doesn't recommend" where I talk about how the new breed of white-power types claim not to be white-power types so as to avoid unsavory associations.  Which is what you're doing here.

If you aren't a "racialist" then why do you know Gobineau or defend racialism -- new term for me -- as not being exclusively anglo-German?  Why would you care?  Clearly you have the belief that certain races are superior to others.

I will tell you, racial intermixing is not all that the Jєωs are trying to foment.  Because this fear of the black males like Seal stealing all the white women is another media illusion created by the Jєωs, inciting people to fight against each other and to get trapped in these useless racial squabbles.  Why do you think they promoted that couple so much?  It's not just to incite people to interracial marriage, but to incite people to racial hate.  Just read various comments on chat rooms about that couple, it is like a lightning-rod for white power types.  

So it is you falling for the Marxist i.e. Jєωιѕн brainwashing, because the Catholics simply did not have these views, they didn't put such a primacy on race.  It's just a fact.  There is no Catholic writing you can come up with from the pre-VII era that sounds anything like this stuff that Vox is promoting.  It is Prots who were excessively concerned with race.  As grotesque as the sɛҳuąƖ explosion of the last fifty years is, it's not about race, but just about the fact that it is complete unbridled license of all kind that we're seeing, experimentation with other races, experimentation with both sexes, experimentation with various perversions, etc.  The cure for this is not some kind of genetic determinism showing that blacks are inferior, but Catholic marriage.

Name one saint who says what you say.  ONE.  There aren't any, despite times in the past like in Italy when women were marrying Moors, a wave that eventually burned out.  Like most errors, it's based on an exaggeration, race-mixing is not the foremost threat out there, if you want to say it's a threat at all.  Proving that the Apostasy has anything to do with race-mixing will be hard, however, since it began at a time when it was practically unheard of, except for some rare "pioneer" examples.  It is in the 90's that it really exploded, so how can you say if it's a cause or an effect or simply irrelevant?  

The trap is very easy to see once you have overcome that initial wave of unreflecting anger.  And please don't tell me you don't think like that.  

I just banned two people and am looking to ban a few more. I know how it will turn out, though: they'll mail me and call me a liberal or feminαzι or "Jєω-lover" or whatever, will most likely run off to another forum and go on about how FE is liberal and not even close to "traditional," etc.

This is all true.