Edit: As he describes the state of Catholic formal and informal education, he outlines what the mission of RC-TV is, the "salvation of souls" and the constant teaching of Scripture, the Fathers and the Schoolmen that there is "No Salvation Outside the Catholic Church"

!

I'm glad that Michael Voris believes in the dogma "Outside the Church there is no salvation", but I'm curious to know what his understanding of that dogma is. I've heard a lot of people say many different things with regards to this dogma.

Voris is a frontman for pseudo-rebellion against the Vatican II jubilee squad.

Why don't people rally behind real Catholics today? The end is nigh, my breath has been spent and I am exhausted trying to convince the world and its false Catholics.

Edit: As he describes the state of Catholic formal and informal education, he outlines what the mission of RC-TV is, the "salvation of souls" and the constant teaching of Scripture, the Fathers and the Schoolmen that there is "No Salvation Outside the Catholic Church"

!

Thats nice, though like Daegus I have a few reservations as to what many novus ordo Catholics believe to be the Church and dogma.

This dogma that there is no salvation outside the Church has been attacked in many ways. Some simply just write it off as a fundamentalist view and others have set about more covertly to completely change the meaning of both Church and Dogma.

The post Vat II teachings teach that this "church" includes all "christian" churches and is not simply the One, Holy Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

This is what Ratzinger believes and he teaches that dogma is something that can change or that it evolves with time.

So by the time the modernists have done there renovations and modifications it would run something like this.
One can say, "the dog is brown". Though if that person thinks a dog is a panda and brown is actually purple then you are not singing from the same hymn sheet.

So if the modernists idea of the Church includes all "christians" and their idea of dogma is something that is not set in stone but evolves we are speaking to different languages.

So that is great that Voris is pointing this out though why does he not go to the root of the problem and point out where the corruption and false ideas about his dogma come from.

Perhaps he does not want to do that as that may push him into the traditionalist camp where he will loose many of his followers.