Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => General Discussion => Topic started by: informer1989 on March 09, 2012, 03:09:31 PM
-
-
This guy again?? go away.
-
Do you enjoy mocking sedevacantists, informer (tomas)?
-
Seriously, this guy is just another "Pope" Augustine II. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if this guy IS Augustine!
People like him just get a kick out of mocking sedevacantist Traditional Catholics. No human being in their right mind would do what Augustine and tomas do unless they were either playing a big joke or were mentally ill.
-
I'm glad someone else agrees with me that this is a great satire of Sedes, although this is a real news story.
Wurzburg Archdiocese is featuring this scene...
-
http://www.eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2012/02/wurzburg-blasphemy-on-display-reveals.html
(kreuz.net) The Diocese of Wurzburg is displaying in its Cathedral museum a mockery of the Last Super on a permanent basis.
The Diocese of Wurzburg reported that today,
The abomination was born of the Munich painter and stage builder, Henning von Gierke (64).
Faces from the Familiar
The faces on the figures of the Last Supper mockery have been borrowed from his immediate surroundings.
So it is that on this picture his wife, both of his children and his mother are depicted.
Christ is Absent
The male and female pictures of the Last Supper parody are partly clothed and partly unclothed.
A naked man lies under the table.
The place of Christ in the Last Supper mockery is empty.
In the mean time a projector will play the face of the current visitor, even as he sits on the bench before the abomination.
Ivory Tower Bloviating
The art director of the Diocese of Wurzburg, Jurgen Lenssen, dutifully praised the representation.
They present existential questions -- he blundered on.
The naked figures were allegedly meant to represent "the woundedness of people".
Whoever steps into the room will be drawn into the "stage of life" and must find a place there:
"The Last Super to me, everything, where the celebration of life happens" -- Lennssen dissolves the core even of Christianity into nothing.
-
Hideous Art in Innsbruck...
http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2012/03/hideous-art-in-innsbruck-followed-by.html
-
I think this poster was previously here.
-
I think this poster was previously here.
Yes, he is tomas. He's been banned about 10 times.
-
This is approved by Benedict XVI in person.
Are you the former poster Tomas?
-
This is approved by Benedict XVI in person.
That's what Father Moderator sez... :cussing:
-
The sedevacantist case against Benedict XVI does not rest on claims such as these.
-
The sedevacantist case against Benedict XVI does not rest on claims such as these.
Ever been to traditio?
-
Yes I have. However, I know sedevacantists who do not like the methods that traditio and other sites (virgo-maria) use.
-
Yes I have. However, I know sedevacantists who do not like the methods that traditio and other sites (virgo-maria) use.
I've never met a Sedevacantist who didn't resort to various errors like distortion, special pleading, begging the question...
Anyway, it's forbidden on the main forum to talk about it and I hate talking about it because it's a waste of time.
-
Exactly how is blasphemous art sponsored by some novus ordo diocese in Germany a mockery of the sede position? Especially since this is a real news story.
If you give it some thought, the best thing about that artwork is that it is banal and represents whatever the viewer wants it to represent so this, in fact, renders it meaningless.
How much did this "catholic" diocese pay in commissions to the artist? I mean, after all, why not just purchase a couple pieces created by Robert Maplethorpe (or is it Whipplethorp?)
I do feel pity for the catholics who are trying to hold on to tradition in Germany because with "church taxes" the novus ordites will never really need to worry about funding.
-
We're not talking about sedevacantism but sedevacantists. Anyway, I agree with you on those who use vitriol. Calling a bishop of the Church "Bernie" is wrong.
-
The title of this thread is misleading. I'm no fan of the men currently in the Vatican - but we shouldn't resort to dishonesty.
-
Well, someone might make comments about Michelangelo's paintings.
Nudity by itself isn't scandalous.
A bizarre depiction of the "Last Supper" with nude women and a missing Christ on the other hand, is certainly scandalous.
And make no mistake, the Vatican knows what's going on in these places, and they have the power to do something about it. And if they couldn't stop it, they could condemn it.
Post-Vatican II art, and the hiding away of the old statues, the breaking of the altars, is something the post-conciliar Vatican is on board with, and it's delusional to believe otherwise.
-
Exactly how is blasphemous art sponsored by some novus ordo diocese in Germany a mockery of the sede position?
It's not just this, he's been doing this for nearly two years. Some of the stuff this tomas guy posts is just plain silly. One time he made a thread saying that Benedict "has a thumb that looks like the satanic organ of the Apocalypse". Another time he made a thread that since God spelt backwards is "dog" the english language is cursed. "Pope" Augustine II does the same thing when he goes around saying he is the true Pope. It's nothing but an imitation, a mockery.
Just ask Raoul. He has this tomas guy figured out as well, and can probably explain it better than I can.
-
"If that's art I'm a Hottentot" Harry Truman. Sip Sip
-
Is the poster disgusting or this blasphemy perpetrated by the conciliar church?
-
I banned Tomas -- again.
He can't seem to stop signing up for duplicate accounts. I keep adding his IP to the perma-ban list -- maybe he'll have an increasingly hard time signing on to the forum.