I am concerned at what seems to be the obvious effect of the Vativan's overtures here : By defining the SSPX position as merely an acceptable opinion and meanwhile forcing them to accept the Council "in light of Tradition" or whatever phrase they are using, they thus eliminate the magisterial authority of the encyclicals of the Popes by making the Ordinary Magisterium the subject of unlimited and endless re-interpretation by which its original sense is re-moored on novel foundations; they also eliminate the possibility of pointing out the clear contradictions between the heresies in Vatican II and the Ordinary Magisterium, whilst usurping for their neomodernist theories the equal prestige enjoyed by orthodoxy, the two being equally "legitimate theological opinions able to be held by those of good will." But the modernists win everything with this, since they destroy by fact the authority of the Magisterium, thus setting the precedent by which they can formalise their victory after time causes memories of the Archbishop and the time before the Council to fade. Anybody who says, "Well, we should give them the benefit of the doubt," is allowing himself to be suckered into watching these Modernists trample on the Faith because of his false charity and wishful thinking. Read Auctorem Fidei and Pascendi Dominici.