You are absolutely right. I supplied a wrong title and misspelled the last name. But no excuse. I'm guilty as charged. [....] But hey, I apologize.
Ah,
yes! Repentence. So I'll accept that, and not be calling for a
judge to administer or witness
stripes.
But still, I have to wonder why you would spend two whole hours researching the correct info. Seems to me your might have discovered my error in about 5 or ten minutes.
Huh? Persistent
failure of a sequence of syntactically-correct searches based on the same incorrect assumptions [×] provides
no information about
exactly why it's failing, or
exactly what is incorrect.
For my search, it seemed necessary to keep "ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan" as a 3-word
phrase for my search, because the 2 nouns are so common, and searching for them
separably would lead me farther astray.
If in another forum, I'd posted a favorable review from memory of a book I recommended as, e.g.,
Wonders of the Ocean Planet, but it was really titled
Wonders of the Water Planet, how productive do you think searches by trusting readers would be? Especially considering that mass-market search-engines can't provide
semantic translations, then proceed with them, e.g., "Ocean Planet" to "Water Planet" [
*].
Meanwhile, "A
i kins" repeatedly snagged a prominent Carolina family and its historic home(s), despite me trying to narrow the search by requiring the word "
Catholic" plus either "author" or "book".
Lest any
CathInfo readers assume otherwise,
no, I was not indulging in oneupmanship toward a more-senior
C.I. member.
Hope you've read the book.
You missed out on drawing the correct conclusion from 2 thoughts you expressed:
• I have
not "
read the book"; I've never even seen it.
• It was important for me to get the author & title of the subject book
perfectly correct for a personal reason independent of
CathInfo: I was recently overtaken by a unique situation during which I can afford to buy a limited number of the books that docuмent the implausibly long "Crisis in the Church". Right now, I have access to practically none of the relevant reference literature.
• The errors now rectified,
vere dignum et justum est, I ought to pass the corrected information along to readers of
CathInfo.
I suppose I can offer my 2 hours of frustration with
2 search-engines--on an excruciatingly underpowered p.c.--to ameliorate however many microseconds they'd be converted to for Purgatory.
-------
Note ×: E.g., silly assumptions like, um, the more-senior
C.I. member certainly knows the literature better than I do, so--of course--I can trust that he provided the correct author & title.
Note
*: I believe that 'twas Jacques Cousteau who tried to popularize reference to Earth as the "Water Planet"--or maybe 'twas as the "Blue Planet". To err is human.