CathInfo.com

umm.... those videos are by Trickster? Not funny or enlightening,  just annoying. I dunnno, maybe it's European or Canadian  humor of some variety that I just don't get. (Kind of embarrassed for him...)

Hi 1st Mansion Tenant, are you referring to my videos or Placido Pax (Alphonse Jr)'s videos?  

If you are talking about mine, your opinion is yours and it is valid and I respect it.  The purpose of my video's is to focus a discussion on Traditional Catholicism (which I find very rich) and indigenous spirituality.  Hence I talk about inculturation etc.

These videos' are not scripted, they are pretty spontaneous thoughts, because part of what I am doing now is to learn how to use my camera and so forth.  I hope to create a video-blog which will approach subjects in more of a systematic manner.

As an example, i want to do video-blogs on the writings of the popes in relation to the context, background, purposes and what the encyclicals say and how they relate to the world, and in particular our times.

But for now, I am strictly an amateur, putting my thoughts out there; people are free to listen or move on to the next posting.   It's all good in my mind.

Bruce

His Taj Mahony tour was pretty good, but "Placido" is just annoying. He must have a really dull morning commute. : )

(Is that Jitpring?)

Yes, Jitpring. I'd forgotten his CI handle.

I imagine his commute gives him time to ruminate about these things and making the videos is cathartic for him.

There are worse ways to vent the very justifiable anger that the Modernist Crisis naturally elicits.

Hi BTNYC... I checked out Placido Pax; what an interesting character.. I only listen to two videos and he employs an interesting method in underlining the unreasonable attacks on traditionalists.  

 

I note your use of that qualifier and interpret it to mean that you believe there are "reasonable attacks" on Traditionalists? Would your post defending and promoting the error of Feminism be an example of such a "reasonable" attack on Traditionalists?

If so, have a look again at the responses you garnered. We oppose and abominate your advocacy of error, not because it is an affront to Traditionalists, (i.e. ourselves), but because it is objectively false, and is objectively harmful to society, to persons, and to souls, and is objectively offensive to Almighty God.

You've wrongly framed the argument as being between Traditionalists and those who attack us. That's a relativistic and man-centered understanding which totally leaves God and Objective Truth out of it. That is unfortunate, but not at all surprising coming from a Novus Ordite.

Lex orandi, lex credendi applies for both good and ill, after all.