Author Topic: Tricks to identify transgendered people INCLUDING Michelle Obama (Read 22747 times)

ggreg · « **Reply #15 on:** June 16, 2014, 05:27:47 PM »

Quote from: s2srea

This was stupid. I can't believe you watch... no believe.. this stuff.

Why can't you believe it?

Geocentrism, fake moon landings,....it's all par for the course around here.

s2srea · « **Reply #16 on:** June 16, 2014, 05:29:05 PM »

Its videos like this that make the 'right' look ignorant; makes you look like a neoCon loon.

s2srea · « **Reply #17 on:** June 16, 2014, 05:31:03 PM »

Quote from: ggreg

Quote from: s2srea
This was stupid. I can't believe you watch... no believe.. this stuff.

Why can't you believe it?

Geocentrism, fake moon landings,....it's all par for the course around here.

And don't forget Kennedy. But you're a Brit.... so its understandable :)

Here's a real bet worth $500.

I bet the above amount that 99.99% of the people here who reject the Warren Commission report have not read it in its entirety. But you're right- Its all par for the course.

s2srea · « **Reply #18 on:** June 16, 2014, 05:47:30 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Come on, you're supposed to be a businessman. Don't you have any gut feelings, people-judging skills, or intuition?

Don't get caught up in the details. Keep an eye on the big picture. Look at all the various photos of her throughout the video (heck, look at ANY pictures of Michelle anywhere on the Net). Does she look like a man or not?

My gut feeling tells me it's correct.

Also look at "her" "husband" for crying out loud. Don't tell me you have a hard time believing Obama is a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ.

And the kids don't look like either of them! It's true. Just to take one point: They look about as black as Michelle. But look at Obama! He's only 50% black. The girls shouldn't be 100% black if their father is 50% black. They should definitely have lighter skin.

You'll have to excuse me for being the honest boy in "The Emperor with No Clothes" story.

It all fits together.

Anyhow, your jumping on ONE POINT and emotionally casting away everything else makes you seem emotional, irrational, and desperate to believe a lie. Why?

Sorry Matt- I'm normally in agreement with you, but you seem to be the emotional one here. Re-read your above post.

Look- Michelle is just Fuggin Ugly. Okay. She's black, and many features of black women are off-putting to white men; maybe not black men, but I'm not black, so I don't know. I think that its because there's a sort of masculinity to them perhaps- but that doesn't make her a man. Here's a couple of others. You think they're men too?

Granted, they're sport athletes. But Michelle Obama is also supposedly pretty active. So what? Blacks put on muscle way faster- men included!

Another point. If she is a man- what would stop her and him from now claiming it publicly. They have nothing to lose. He's been re-elected 2 times already. It would only bolster her public image (can you imagine the outpouring support she would receive in the media??

Judas Machabeus · « **Reply #19 on:** June 16, 2014, 05:49:58 PM »

Well, I watched the first 45 seconds and had a good laugh.

I know something about transsɛҳuąƖs, so I could share some tips about identifying them.

However, finger length is not the best method. In fact, finger lengths among transsɛҳuąƖ women are closer to those of genetic women than to those of men. That is, the index and ring fingers are more often close or equal in length, as they are for women. That reflects the degree of virilization at a critical point later in gestation -- the same hormone bath that determines sex-specific brain structures. This is why finger length can be used to help diagnose transsɛҳuąƖism.

My index and ring fingers are exactly equal.

By the way, I'm happy to answer sincere questions, even if they are critical. I'm Clare Brigid on Fisheaters.

Judas Machabeus · « **Reply #20 on:** June 16, 2014, 06:49:56 PM »

So here is one important clue. Michelle Obama's forehead is missing the more or less prominent brow ridge that can be seen on the skulls of most men.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #21 on:** June 16, 2014, 06:57:32 PM »

Quote from: ggreg

Quote from: s2srea
This was stupid. I can't believe you watch... no believe.. this stuff.

Why can't you believe it?

Geocentrism, fake moon landings,....it's all par for the course around here.

Absolutely. If a member of the news media or the "scientific" establishment were to stop over and say, "Good Morning", then I'd give it a 50-50 shot that it was actually evening. You're a simpleton and a dupe and a classic useful idiot if you don't question everything you're told by the people who are working for the prince of this world. Government does nothing but lie; most of the high ranking government officials have sold their souls to the devil.

There's significantly more evidence FOR geocentrism than against it, significantly more evidence that the moon landing footage was faked than there is that it wasn't, etc. But you're a brainwashed useful idiot.

Judas Machabeus · « **Reply #22 on:** June 16, 2014, 07:04:13 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

Quote from: Judas Machabeus
My index and ring fingers are exactly equal.

I guess that means you could go either way.

A longer ring finger suggests elevated androgens during the pregnancy. That is why most (but not all) men have a longer ring finger. Women's index and ring fingers are typically close or equal in length.

This is one of many studies: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306453005001770

By the way, this is a statistical difference. One cannot deduce anything certain about an individual from digit ratio. So far, Greg is making the most sense in this thread.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #23 on:** June 16, 2014, 07:40:48 PM »

Quote from: Judas Machabeus

So far, Greg is making the most sense in this thread.

No, he's not.

You guys need to use your brains. That finger ratio thing is just one of SEVERAL data points that all lead in the same direction.

1) finger proportions
2) ratio between width of head and width of shoulders
3) ratio between height of head and total height
4) ratio between hips and shoulders
5) overall musculature
6) false eyebrow line (created with makeup to hide original masculine brow)
7) point on the torso where the sides cinch in
8) mysterious bulge on the front of Michelle (seen in tight dress) where male anatomy should be

So if #1 is 96% probability, then if we could get numbers on the probabilities of #2, #3, #4, #7, etc. ... I bet the OVERALL statistical probability that Michelle = Mike would exceed 99.9% if not more. Then you mix in #5, #6, and #8 ... along with the general gut feel that Mike gives men the creeps, that there are allegations that Obama is a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ (anyone hear of Larry Sinclair? AND to echo Matthew, just look at Obama), and

So, taking ALL the data points together, it's a very compelling case.

Instead, you simpletons are obsessed at looking at the single point, taken in isolation, which only has a 96% statistical probability.

You people turn your brains off because you have been mesmerized by the propagandists.

While I don't agree with everything that comes from Alex Jones, you really should listen to his show. He cites actual evidence, declassified docuмents, substantiated news reports ... things which people generally don't know about because they don't get broad exposure ... and these will help wake you up and bring you into a paradigm shift with regard to how you view the world.

The Penny Catechism · « **Reply #24 on:** June 16, 2014, 08:27:22 PM »

Quote from: s2srea

Quote from: Matthew
Come on, you're supposed to be a businessman. Don't you have any gut feelings, people-judging skills, or intuition?

Don't get caught up in the details. Keep an eye on the big picture. Look at all the various photos of her throughout the video (heck, look at ANY pictures of Michelle anywhere on the Net). Does she look like a man or not?

My gut feeling tells me it's correct.

Also look at "her" "husband" for crying out loud. Don't tell me you have a hard time believing Obama is a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ.

And the kids don't look like either of them! It's true. Just to take one point: They look about as black as Michelle. But look at Obama! He's only 50% black. The girls shouldn't be 100% black if their father is 50% black. They should definitely have lighter skin.

You'll have to excuse me for being the honest boy in "The Emperor with No Clothes" story.

It all fits together.

Anyhow, your jumping on ONE POINT and emotionally casting away everything else makes you seem emotional, irrational, and desperate to believe a lie. Why?

Sorry Matt- I'm normally in agreement with you, but you seem to be the emotional one here. Re-read your above post.

Look- Michelle is just Fuggin Ugly. Okay. She's black, and many features of black women are off-putting to white men; maybe not black men, but I'm not black, so I don't know. I think that its because there's a sort of masculinity to them perhaps- but that doesn't make her a man. Here's a couple of others. You think they're men too?

Granted, they're sport athletes. But Michelle Obama is also supposedly pretty active. So what? Blacks put on muscle way faster- men included!

Another point. If she is a man- what would stop her and him from now claiming it publicly. They have nothing to lose. He's been re-elected 2 times already. It would only bolster her public image (can you imagine the outpouring support she would receive in the media??

She's got some guns there; grant it she's actively tightening up her triceps to hold the dumbbells. Proverbial 'horseshoe' triceps

Immaculata001 · « **Reply #25 on:** June 16, 2014, 09:05:34 PM »

[quoteIn this messed-up modern world, being able to identify someone's true gender seems like a useful skill to have. That's why I invested 20 minutes of my life to watch the above video. I consider it time well-spent. [/quote]

I'm a teacher and there have been times, particularly as a substitute, when I've had no idea what gender a student is. Even the NAMES don't give you a clue! How does one even address such a student ?

Immaculata001 · « **Reply #26 on:** June 16, 2014, 09:13:58 PM »

Quote from: s2srea

Quote from: Matthew
Come on, you're supposed to be a businessman. Don't you have any gut feelings, people-judging skills, or intuition?

Don't get caught up in the details. Keep an eye on the big picture. Look at all the various photos of her throughout the video (heck, look at ANY pictures of Michelle anywhere on the Net). Does she look like a man or not?

My gut feeling tells me it's correct.

Also look at "her" "husband" for crying out loud. Don't tell me you have a hard time believing Obama is a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ.

And the kids don't look like either of them! It's true. Just to take one point: They look about as black as Michelle. But look at Obama! He's only 50% black. The girls shouldn't be 100% black if their father is 50% black. They should definitely have lighter skin.

You'll have to excuse me for being the honest boy in "The Emperor with No Clothes" story.

It all fits together.

Anyhow, your jumping on ONE POINT and emotionally casting away everything else makes you seem emotional, irrational, and desperate to believe a lie. Why?

Sorry Matt- I'm normally in agreement with you, but you seem to be the emotional one here. Re-read your above post.

Look- Michelle is just Fuggin Ugly. Okay. She's black, and many features of black women are off-putting to white men; maybe not black men, but I'm not black, so I don't know. I think that its because there's a sort of masculinity to them perhaps- but that doesn't make her a man. Here's a couple of others. You think they're men too?

Granted, they're sport athletes. But Michelle Obama is also supposedly pretty active. So what? Blacks put on muscle way faster- men included!

Another point. If she is a man- what would stop her and him from now claiming it publicly. They have nothing to lose. He's been re-elected 2 times already. It would only bolster her public image (can you imagine the outpouring support she would receive in the media??

Would really appreciate that we not demean all Black women. I happen to Black, but beyond that, most Black ethnics have noticed that American Blacks look different/are less attractive than other Black ethnic groups. We have no idea why, but it seems to be the case. For instance, it would be difficult to find a woman who looks like Michelle Obama in my culture. I've heard black Caribbeans, for instance remark one how ugly she is.

stillearning · « **Reply #27 on:** June 16, 2014, 10:41:08 PM »

OK I did NOT mean to just "like" this post. I honestly think it's pretty stupid.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #28 on:** June 16, 2014, 11:17:21 PM »

Quote from: Brennus

Quote from: Ladislaus
Quote from: Judas Machabeus
My index and ring fingers are exactly equal.

I guess that means you could go either way.

This poster is a transɛҳuąƖ troll. Ignore him.

That's actually what I was implying by my comment.

TheKnightVigilant · « **Reply #29 on:** June 17, 2014, 05:03:16 AM »

Quote from: s2srea

Sorry Matt- I'm normally in agreement with you, but you seem to be the emotional one here. Re-read your above post.

Look- Michelle is just Fuggin Ugly. Okay. She's black, and many features of black women are off-putting to white men; maybe not black men, but I'm not black, so I don't know. I think that its because there's a sort of masculinity to them perhaps- but that doesn't make her a man. Here's a couple of others. You think they're men too?

The woman in the first picture doesn't look masculine.

I don't think black women tend to look any more masculine than white women.