Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Traditionalist-Catholic defends Sigmund Freud  (Read 2118 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wopako

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
Traditionalist-Catholic defends Sigmund Freud
« on: May 24, 2013, 02:07:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Freud is often falsely accused of instructing his patients to give free reign to their unconscious impulses. While it is true he felt that an excessive inhibitory attitude towards the sɛҳuąƖ instinct was undesirable, it is oft forgot that he held this view because such a repressive attitude only served to enhance the subjective value of sɛҳuąƖ drives. As a matter of fact, he tells us that love in the wider sense suffers when there are but few barriers in the way of sɛҳuąƖ gratification.

    ...


    Offline Tiffany

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3112
    • Reputation: +1639/-32
    • Gender: Female
    Traditionalist-Catholic defends Sigmund Freud
    « Reply #1 on: May 24, 2013, 06:53:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Have you ever read his writings? It's a bunch of perversion and very degrading towards young women.


    Offline Tiffany

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3112
    • Reputation: +1639/-32
    • Gender: Female
    Traditionalist-Catholic defends Sigmund Freud
    « Reply #2 on: May 24, 2013, 07:10:04 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Plus it should be common sense we view these movements in humanism as a danger. If there are commonalities  :barf:  (I really doubt!) they are only superficial ones. We are not starting from the same place and his goal is to destroy Christian thought.

    I can't get past the perversion that any Christian or just non pervert would view him in a good light.

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8901
    • Reputation: +8675/-849
    • Gender: Male
    Traditionalist-Catholic defends Sigmund Freud
    « Reply #3 on: May 24, 2013, 07:22:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0



  • "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10512
    • Reputation: +3267/-207
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    Traditionalist-Catholic defends Sigmund Freud
    « Reply #4 on: May 24, 2013, 09:14:43 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Freud and his followers are totally committed to the destruction of
    Christian Civilization and the promotion of immoral and hedonistic
    perversions that they want to brand socially accepted values.
    I should know, I studied Freud in my college classes and it took me
    decades to recover.


    Offline Elizabeth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4845
    • Reputation: +2194/-15
    • Gender: Female
    Traditionalist-Catholic defends Sigmund Freud
    « Reply #5 on: May 24, 2013, 09:55:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Psychiatrists are now mostly looked down upon by their peers in the medical establishment.  Maybe it's because so many of their patients who were prescribed anti-depressants and sleeping pills have killed themselves and others.

    Offline Elizabeth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4845
    • Reputation: +2194/-15
    • Gender: Female
    Traditionalist-Catholic defends Sigmund Freud
    « Reply #6 on: May 24, 2013, 09:58:50 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  Or maybe people have wised up to the huge lie of Israeli Peter Kramer's

    "groundbreaking" 1993 book Listening to Prozac which I read back then.
     :barf: :barf: :barf:

    Offline suger

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 43
    • Reputation: +116/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Traditionalist-Catholic defends Sigmund Freud
    « Reply #7 on: May 24, 2013, 10:50:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • One should be very cautious re. Rama Coomaraswamy's writing. His father (Ananda by first name if I remember correctly) was a esoterist Hindu. Although Rama joined traditional Catholicism, one should not forget that the major esoterist thinker, Rene Guenon, had stated that trad. Catholicism was the only authentic tradition in the West (but in Arab countries, you would have to be a Muslim, and in India a Hindu.), and I suspect this the reason the sun became Catholic.

    While living like a traditionalist in the USA, Rama would send at the same time papers to French esoterist magazine, such as "Vers la tradition".

    Coming back to the present text, it comes from an article here :
    http://www.sacredweb.com/online_articles/sw3_coomaraswamy.html

    and here we can see that Rama has a table with the typical gnostic tripartite view of man as of being composed to three different components (body / soul / spirit) instead of the Catholic dualist view (body / soul).

    For me he was a pseudo-catholic, defending traditionalism only because of his esoteric covert views.

    So I am not surprised about him defending Freud, and I don't think Catholics should heed to that kind of writings by Rama Coomaraswamy,


    Offline Hatchc

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 521
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Traditionalist-Catholic defends Sigmund Freud
    « Reply #8 on: May 24, 2013, 10:24:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Jєωιѕн cognitive therapist Frederick Eberstadt once told me that Freud was a monster and a barbarian. I didn't ask him if that's a pretty good indication that Freudian offshoots like cognitive therapy are problematic.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Traditionalist-Catholic defends Sigmund Freud
    « Reply #9 on: May 24, 2013, 11:47:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .


    Ever since ancient times and even unto today the penchant of Zionist
    Jєωs to be obsessed with sex is unstoppable.  It has been there all
    along, but it took Freud to make it somehow respectable, by way of
    sophistries and complicated theories.  That doesn't make it virtuous,
    but it does make it seductive -- provided the subject pays attention.

    If you or I don't pay him any attention, then we don't get sucked in
    to the seduction of his prurient thinking.

    Fr. Gregorius Hesse put it most powerfully some dozen years ago, and
    it's on a recording he made at the time. He said that if instead of Eve
    in the Garden of Eden, it had been the Blessed Virgin Mary, she would
    not have paused to even listen to the serpent. At the very most, she
    may have turned to tell him where to go: "Go back to hell, from
    whence you came!"
    Imagine how the history of the world would have
    been different if Eve had responded with that kind of purity of heart.

    And, he continued in his Austrian accent, we should have nothing to
    do with the devil or with his agents.  Sigmund Freud is nothing other
    than such an agent of the devil, and his writings are good for nothing,
    so why should we read them?  When someone hands you his book, try
    to remember to say this:  


    "Send this back to hell, from whence it came."





    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Traditionalist-Catholic defends Sigmund Freud
    « Reply #10 on: May 24, 2013, 11:58:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .



    Quote from: I forgot to mention I was responding to Incredulous when he







    Ever since ancient times and even unto today the penchant of Zionist
    Jєωs to be obsessed with sex is unstoppable.  It has been there all
    along, but it took Freud to make it somehow respectable, by way of
    sophistries and complicated theories.  That doesn't make it virtuous,
    but it does make it seductive -- provided the subject pays attention.

    If you or I don't pay him any attention, then we don't get sucked in
    to the seduction of his prurient thinking.

    Fr. Gregorius Hesse put it most powerfully some dozen years ago, and
    it's on a recording he made at the time. He said that if instead of Eve
    in the Garden of Eden, it had been the Blessed Virgin Mary, she would
    not have paused to even listen to the serpent. At the very most, she
    may have turned to tell him where to go: "Go back to hell, from
    whence you came!"
    Imagine how the history of the world would have
    been different if Eve had responded with that kind of purity of heart.

    And, he continued in his Austrian accent, we should have nothing to
    do with the devil or with his agents.  Sigmund Freud is nothing other
    than such an agent of the devil, and his writings are good for nothing,
    so why should we read them?  

    When someone hands you his book, try to remember to say this:  




    "Send this back to hell, from whence it came."






    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline Lighthouse

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 872
    • Reputation: +580/-27
    • Gender: Male
    Traditionalist-Catholic defends Sigmund Freud
    « Reply #11 on: May 26, 2013, 03:57:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yeah, look how much good it did for Woody Allen.

     :rolleyes: