There are many men who commit incest and molest young girls.
How is it possible, then, that this happens so rarely in the Novus Ordo and that these priests are almost always chicken hawks?
Only the most insipid political correctness could make anyone believe that these "priests" being married would cure their ills. The truth, as Matthew said, is that there is a pedophile network in the Novus Ordo. One pedophile becomes head of a seminary, guess what happens? He admits others who are like him, and blocks out the non-effeminate men. Goodbye, good men. Like attracts like. We all know that gαys use various signs and signals by which they recognize each other, like they flip up the tongues of their shoes or put a flag in their back pocket or whatever. They know.
If the problem were celibacy in itself, a much better argument in favor of married priests would be the concubine epidemic in the Middle Ages. Yet no one made the argument then; at least no one I've heard of. This was when many priests had live-in female lovers.
Hmmm... In the Middle Ages, the priests were comitting sin with women... Now they are ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ pedophiles... Something tells me this isn't about the rigors of celibacy. If they were heterosɛҳuąƖs struggling with celibacy, they would have female lovers, they wouldn't be preying on boys.