Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: These moles are getting annoying  (Read 4116 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Raoul76

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4803
  • Reputation: +2007/-6
  • Gender: Male
These moles are getting annoying
« Reply #30 on: October 31, 2011, 10:06:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Diego comes off like one of these Hoffmann types, if not Hoffman himself -- he is dropping some pretty heavy Jєωιѕн terms -- who are far too obsessed with the Jєωs.  These people tend to have some wacky ideas.  Hoffman actually calls Hitler "the gravedigger of the German people" so at least he doesn't have those sympathies; but he is either an Americanist or very close to one, denigrates the kings, etc.

    So how do you feel about the nαzιs, Diego?  Or the separation of Church and state?  The thought police are calling; will you submit to my тαℓмυdic grilling?

    In any case, I think people have given you the benefit of the doubt.  No one would be suspicious of you if you didn't keep calling everyone overly suspicious.

    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.


    Offline Diego

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1277
    • Reputation: +4/-1
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #31 on: November 01, 2011, 01:52:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If I found you edifying in any way, I would engage you on any matter.


    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #32 on: November 01, 2011, 02:21:54 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Bishop Fellay has done plenty already.  An agreement with Rome would simply be the fait accompli of what is a long process.  Right now it seems they need to let things simmer down a bit - they've stirred up some unrest.  They will placate the mass of priests and isolate the dissidents and emphasize the importance of respect for their "authority" (irregular authority that is only valid insofar as they act to preserve the Faith).  

    These things have been gone over plenty of times, but the changes in the SSPX that will precede some sort of final sellout have been and will continue to be substantial so long as the cabal surrounding Bishop Fellay is in power.

    As for Bishop Fellay's words about Bishop Williamson - we can judge his intentions behind them by his actions towards Bishop Williamson.  I'm surprised we're going back to the "uranium" comments given the the very disrespectful message he sent to Bishop Williamson telling him to stop sending out his Eleison commentary.

    Bishop Fellay and his people have done plenty already.  What Archbishop Lefebvre said about disobedience to the Pope certainly applies to someone in an irregular position of authority like Bishop Fellay.  But in the SSPX, the SSPX rules trump Church rules.  The head of the SSPX is invested with more authority than they invest their nominal Pope.


    Offline Sigismund

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5386
    • Reputation: +3121/-44
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #33 on: November 01, 2011, 06:29:29 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Perhaps the part where you keep bringing it up.
    Stir up within Thy Church, we beseech Thee, O Lord, the Spirit with which blessed Josaphat, Thy Martyr and Bishop, was filled, when he laid down his life for his sheep: so that, through his intercession, we too may be moved and strengthen by the same Spir

    Offline chaz89

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 96
    • Reputation: +36/-1
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #34 on: November 01, 2011, 06:42:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    Quote from: Matthew
    To those who would like more peaceful discussions sharing info about devotions, etc. --

    I would just say, "This forum is whatever YOU make it." If even ONE person started posted what they wanted to see, the forum would move toward their "vision" by a pretty decent-sized step.

    I'm sure there are sayings out there that would be appropriate -- "BE the change you wish to see" or something to that effect -- even "Rather than curse the darkness, light a candle."


    Matthew, could you atleast delete this disturbing picture that tradition1987 posted? I'll post the link to the thread for you to delete it, but be warned the picture he posted of lucifer is incredibly disturbing, that's why I suggest you delete it and the thread.

    http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Vatican-names-its-new-telescope-LUCIFER

    Maybe they should have named it Roscoe.   :laugh2:  Just kidding!


    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #35 on: November 01, 2011, 08:48:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • LOL. That would be a good name for it.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #36 on: November 01, 2011, 11:31:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Diego said:
    Quote
    If I found you edifying in any way, I would engage you on any matter.


    Ah, I see.  You are brimming with such charm, Diego!

    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #37 on: November 01, 2011, 12:21:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Diego said:  
    Quote
    And the personal assaults on Michael Hoffman's wife and family and the firebombing of the Institute of Historical Review are good reasons to use a nom de guerre.


    This has got to be either Michael Hoffmann or someone who is such a huge fan that he has morphed into Michael Hoffmann.  But that passage above could be his mea culpa for being incognito.  He also defends Hoffmann and shills his books, has almost exactly the same viewpoints, is SSPX, same personality, speaks with authority about the Jєωs, etc.  

    I am just confused because in one place he calls himself a Catholic monarchist.

    Whoever this is, I was going through his posts, and he says that Capistrano should not only not be banned, but be "fêted."  Capistrano being the one who approved of the non-Catholic nαzιs attacking a Catholic nation.  Don't expect to be above suspicion after that, Diego.  

    P.S. I don't know what the Institute of Historical Review is but Hitler's underlings firebombed the Reichstag in order to create a false-flag to start World War II, and I am quite certain the devil is going to use similar tactics to have the Catholic movement hijacked by the wrong people, Gallicans, nαzι-sympathizers, racist, etc.  He will set up false martyrs as he is clearly doing with Reynouard, as Hitler was once portrayed as a kind of underdog and false martyr.  It's the oldest trick in the book.  When it comes to heretics -- not that all these people are heretics, but those who have supremacist racial ideas probably are -- no one knows better than they how to feign long-suffering and humility, while using the worldly indulgences of the churchmen against them.  "Oh, we are pure and living in a cave, but they live in luxury!"  With Reynouard, it's "Oh, I've been in prison, I'm a martyr of the faith -- NOW BOW DOWN FOR MY NATIONAL SOCIALIST CATHOLICISM."  
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.


    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #38 on: November 01, 2011, 01:18:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Another suggestion about the identity of Diego, is that he runs the whoislikeuntogod.com website.  He is apparently a big fan of Hoffman and even got rebuked by Hoffman for using a chunk of his material.  His views are very similar to Diego's, but I can't find what he thinks about nαzιs.

    He seems a bit confused.  He apparently is favorable to the monarchy but then writes:  

    Quote
    "If non-Catholics are familiar with the WeAreChange movement and those which are similar, the desire of restoration of the country to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights is the goal of all free people; it is without a doubt that evidence points to the fact that public policies and new legislation are pushing toward the One World Government, One World currency, and One World ruling, by those elitists who desire control of the world with their dictatorship."


    Yet elsewhere on the site he talks about the Great Monarch prophecies... Kind of mixed-up.

    The idea that America stands in the way of the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr, though perhaps an honest mistake, is still a mistake.  America is the cornerstone of the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr.  The nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr is not some future event; it began with the French Revolution and America.  I'm sorry to keep repeating this, but it does bear repeating:  The Old World Order is the Catholic monarchies; the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr is the ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic Republics of which America is the shining star, Mystery Babylon, which has infected practically all nations of the Earth with its "ideals."  

    Apocalypse 17:5 --
    Quote
    And the woman was clothed round about with purple and scarlet, and gilt with gold, and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand, full of the abomination and filthiness of her fornication.


    This is about America becoming the wealthiest and strongest nation due to its anti-Christ policies, separating Church and state, spreading an uncontrolled and chaotic democracy everywhere.

    Those like Alex Jones who talk about the future nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr, whether they know it or not, are doing a sleight-of-hand routine.  We have been living in a nearly perfected nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr for almost a hundred years now.  People think that unless we get a common currency and a one-world leader we are still not in the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr; where do they get this notion?  There is no evidence for it.  Maybe the problem is that "nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr" is not a Catholic term in the first place and appears to be a distracting invention of the devil.  Who cares when or what the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr is?  All we need to know is: Is such-and-such a nation Catholic, or is it not?  America is not.  

    There doesn't have to be a single currency or a single leader for us to be in real bad shape.  Even the Anti-Christ may not necessarily be the only leader on earth when he comes.  What we do know is he will set himself as the sole spiritual leader to be followed, but there may still be kings and so on.  It's like people have read too much Americanized Protestant prophecy.  It's funny to see people scaring themselves with some future nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr when the time we live in is so much worse even than their imaginary NWO -- the Church is almost totally dead!  
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #39 on: November 01, 2011, 01:40:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Raoul, thanks for pointing out this stuff. I definitely don't trust Diego now.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline InfiniteFaith

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1590
    • Reputation: +167/-2
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #40 on: November 01, 2011, 08:20:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • what is a mole?


    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #41 on: November 01, 2011, 08:34:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: InfiniteFaith
    what is a mole?


    Basically it's the same thing as a troll.

    Hey Diego, thanks for the ignore. I consider that a badge of honor.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Diego

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1277
    • Reputation: +4/-1
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #42 on: November 01, 2011, 10:33:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So much for your perspicacity, I have not formally ignored you. Blame someone else, my poor paranoid correspondent.

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #43 on: November 01, 2011, 11:00:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ok, THAT I will apologise for. I'm sorry for jumping to conclusions, Diego.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Diego

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1277
    • Reputation: +4/-1
    • Gender: Male
    These moles are getting annoying
    « Reply #44 on: November 01, 2011, 11:25:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Apology accepted... could be a trend if you let it.