.

This topic came up on another thread.

Quote from: hollingsworth

Matthew:

Quote

I asked about it once, and I was told that the flag in the sanctuary is an explicit "statement" that Church and State should be united, not separated...
 

I am sure that many of the sspx faithful have asked a similar question over the years.  If the flag is an "explicit statement,"  then one would think that at least one sermon, or a portion of one, in the 50 year history of the SSPX might have been dedicated to such an explanation.  I have never heard one.  Have any of you ever heard a sermon which develops this theme?  

It would seem my priest had read your post, hollingsworth, before
he gave his sermon today, but that couldn't be since he gave it 6
hours before you posted this.  See below.

Quote

My feeling has always been that the Americanist-oriented Church, including the sspx, has [always] wanted to assure the public at large that American Catholics are [patriotic], law abiding citizens, who basically, in every instance, support the domestic and foreign agenda of the U.S.     If the latent meaning of the flag in the Sanctuary is as Matthew understands it,  then there are probably many of us who don't know that, and would never even have imagined it without some kind of a clear explanation.  It doesn't necessarily jump out at one.

Quote from: Matthew

...I couldn't argue with that.

Before I looked into it, I assumed the same thing (Americanism).

It might be helpful if Matthew could remember who it was that
provided that answer to him.

[My comments in brackets...]

My priest today explained that the Kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ
as explained in Quas Primas of Pope Pius XI [and as expounded in the
writings of Fr. Denis Fahey BTW -- the Social Kingship of Our Lord
Jesus Christ], was the idea behind the establishment of the Feast of
Christ the King on the LAST SUNDAY OF OCTOBER, which we maintain
in our traditional calendar.  

He said that Paul VI (whose name is not mentioned in polite company)
had a meeting with protestant ministers, which is a docuмented fact
because there was exactly such a group who drew up the NovusOrdo
Newmass, and he asked them about this idea of the Kingship of Our
Lord.  

The answer they came up with is yes, they acknowledge the Kingship
of Jesus too, however, there was a problem with protestants co-
celebrating such a "Feast Day" together with Catholics when it's on
the last Sunday of October, because then there is a time, about 4 or
5 weeks before the end of the liturgical year (which Advent makes
somewhat unmovable) due to the reality that this period of time would
mean that this agreed-upon Kingship is something that applies to
this world before the END OF THE WORLD, and as such, it would be
the Catholic Church whose AUTHORITY is implied or even necessary
by such an acknowledgement.  The protestants could not abide by
recognizing the authority of the Catholic Church.  

Therefore, they proposed a COMPROMISE, by which the Pope would
MOVE this feast day to the last Sunday in NOVEMBER, and then the
protestants would be happy with that, as it would extinguish the
temporal aspect (Read: the SOCIAL Kingship of Our Lord), and
then, [as Rodney King said, "Can't we all just get along?"] this new
place would allow for a 'concelebration' of this feast [even though
most protestants abhor the notion of any "feast day" whatsoever].

[One is left wondering if the principle of concelebration per se may
well be traceable to this 'deal' between Modernist Rome and the
Modernist Protestants.]

[Perhaps someone else can research the time when the move was made
of October to November.]

He said that when Pius XI issued Quas Primas, "it was the biggest non-
event in the history of the Church," because worldwide, bishops, and
almost conspicuously American Bishops, turned a DEAF EAR to this
and did NOTHING to carry it out, beyond having Christ the King on the
appointed Sunday -- but that didn't last for long!!!!!

He said that this doctrine of Holy Mother Church is not reformable.  The
RIGHT OF GOD is to have the Catholic Church as the One, True Church
outside of which there is no salvation [a dogma of the Faith defined no
less that 3 times, and pronounced numerous other times ever since
the Apostles] as the acknowledged authority for ALL NATIONS in the
world [actually, in the universe].

Our Lord Jesus Christ has the INALIENABLE RIGHT to be King of every
nation, every state, every county, every principality, every city, every
group of men and EVERY HUMAN CREATURE in the world [universe].

"It is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human
creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff" - ex cathedra,
Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, A.D. 1215, Denz. 802.

There is absolutely no reason that any false religion (such as
protestantism, Islam (Mohammedanism), Judaism, Buddhism, etc.)
should be allowed to practice their false creed in public anywhere on
planet Earth [or in the universe].

As such, the Catholic Faith should be the acknowledged religion of
state everywhere without exception.  It is the right of God for this to
be, and we have no right to upstage the rights of God.

He did not mention the flag in the sanctuary, however, nor did we have
one while he was giving this sermon.


.

.

The sermon today to which I refer lasted about 25 minutes, and
all I can do is recall portions of it from memory.  

Fr. said that it has always been the work of Freemasons to destroy
the Church.  He said that Quas Primas came to us by a good pope
in the wake of the devastating World War I.  At the time, they only
called it "THE GREAT WAR" because there had never been anything
like it in history.  All of Europe was torn asunder.  For miles and for
hundreds of miles in all directions, France, Spain, Germany were
pitted with enormous holes of poison and death.  These "toxic
cesspools" were everywhere.

From out of this open wound on the land, the doctrine of the Kingship
of Our Lord Jesus Christ was meant to be a healing balm, but the
Catholic bishops missed their cue -- and why would they have done
so?  The answer is in their corruption by Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.  There were
many bishops who were perhaps Masons, but there were many more
whose literal membership was a moot point, in fact, their non-
membership was used by the Masons to their advantage.  The
abiding principle in this is that you don't have to be a Mason to be
one who promotes the Masonic agenda.

As with Communism, which is closely related to Masonry, there are
many "USEFUL IDIOTS" who help them in their work.

You may have heard the Communist leader who said that American
businessmen would happily market the rope that Communism would
use to make a NOOSE to hang America by the throat until dead, if
only these useful idiots could make a profit on the rope.

It is their agenda to destroy the Church.  But the power and influence
of Holy Mother Church on the societies of the world was too great
in the 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, for them to do so, and
the "Great War" was ENGINEERED by these agents of Antichrist.  It
was not started by any assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, but
rather it was set up in advance by "the powers that be" in order to
disrupt the Kingdom of God as founded by the Church.  Only AFTER
this disruption, a.k.a. WWI, was the need obvious for the Pope to
provide the world with the teaching found in Quas Primas, not
that it couldn't have come prior to that, but the need wasn't somehow
obvious.  

We are prone to make do with the here and now until necessity
demands that we do more.  WWI was the necessity.  

Add to that the fact that in the middle of WWI, Our Lady came at
Fatima to tell us that this war would end, but another EVEN WORSE
one would erupt if Her Message was not heeded.  Later She came
to Sister Lucia to explain the details of that, but in 1917, She said
that She requests of the Pope the Consecration of Russia.  Only
years later would it become clear that it is specifically the Collegial
Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary together
with the bishops of the world that would be necessary.  She said
that "The Pope will do it but it will be late."  What an understatement!

It has been "late" for well nigh 80 years already.

Just as Quas Primas did not come out until push came to shove, so
too the Consecration isn't going to happen, apparently (we can pray
that it will, though!) until some major catastrophe pushes and shoves
the Pope and Bishops into the realization that it is the only hope that
mankind has to avoid total destruction.  There are many remnants of
WWII even today, in remote places where German and American tanks
are found abandoned, and many parts are removed by salvage seekers.

If we think WWI and WWII were bad, we have no idea what WWIII will
be like.  

WWI and WWII were engineered to destroy the Reign of Christ the
King, and then Paul VI (whose name isn't mentioned in polite company)
spat in the face of God, like the Jєωs who crucified Him, with his
abominable policies of Vat.II and the Newmass and moving the Feast
of Christ the King to displace the 24th and Last Sunday after Pentecost.  

That's the day we hear St. Matthew's Chapter 24 in the Gospel.

That is, we SHOULD hear it.  But the NovusOrdo parishes all over the
world will not, because it has been EXPUNGED from their liturgy.  

What this means to us is, we might do well to be reading Mt. xxiv on
a regular basis, so as to see what it is the Freemasons are so afraid of.
And while we're at it, we should take a quick peek at Mt. xxiii, too.

Just as WWI and WWII were engineered, so too WWIII is engineered.
As Bishop Williamson says, it seems to have already been set up and
awaits a flash point that could come at any time now.  We have a
situation in the Holy Land, where SQUATTERS who have no right to
be there (because they rejected Christ, and they "did not recognize
the time of their visitation"), and as such do not belong there.  The
Holy Land belongs to the rightful heirs of God's kingdom, and we are
called to recognize this fact.  The injustices of man do not
overshadow and replace the justice of God.


.

 :reading: