I don't foam at the mouth at uneducated accusations or conflations. Sometimes when drinking a good German lager....
Sutton's book has made a number of omissions which I would be more than happy to expand upon later. For now, I will say that dealing with the Rothschilds and being a blood relative are 2 different things.
So let's get this straight. You want to use a Albert Pike, A 33rd degree Mason and one of the founding fathers, and head of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ as a siren of truth? You do know that one of Hitler's first actions as Chancellor, was the closing of all Masonic Temples and banning of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ?
You do know that Hitler actually threw a Rothschild in jail, right?
I think you need to step away from the David Icke schtick and learn real history.
As anyone who reads the book "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler" can tell, Antony Sutton is hardly "uneducated". In fact, one doesn't need to read his books at all, but simply gaze over his credentials, to realize this. According to Wikipedia: "Sutton studied at the universities of London, Gottingen, and California; and received his Doctor of Science from the University of Southhampton. He was an economics professor at California State University, Los Angeles, and a research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution from 1968 to 1973." As for his keen research capabilities, one-time National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, wrote:For impressive evidence of Western participation in the early phase of Soviet economic growth, see Antony C. Sutton's Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development: 1917–1930, which argues that 'Soviet economic development for 1917–1930 was essentially dependent on Western technological aid' (p.283), and that 'at least 95 percent of the industrial structure received this assistance.' (Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, New York: Viking Press;1970, pg. 348)No, Antony Sutton is not "uneducated".As for Hitler's actions against Masonic Lodges, and Freemasons in general - these are nothing more than common "smokescreen" tactics - not unlike the Protestant minister who rails from the pulpit against "sins of the flesh", while secretly picking up prostitutes at night. The same is true of Hitler's actions against the Masons. These were nothing but smokescreens. That's all. Quit being so naive. And the same is true of Hitler's throwing a Rothschild in jail (I'm sure they both had a good laugh that night). The Cabal isn't stupid, DeLeg. They're very clever. They're also psychopathic. If their plan means causing a little suffering of their own people, they'll fulfill it without a moment's hesitation - as they've said themselves ("Protocols"). Anyway, smokescreens are an old trick. Unfortunately, as you've just proven, they still work. Regarding Albert Pike and the letter he wrote to Mazzini, this letter was written in 1871 and sat on public display in the British Museum Library in London until 1977 (in other words, it preexisted the rise of Hitler). This is the "siren of truth". The plan existed prior to Hitler's rise. It was on public display for all to see. I don't need to rely on Pike, or Mazzini, or anyone else for evidence here. I only mentioned the letter as evidence of the pre-existent plan of the Zionist Cabal - a plan which Adolph Hitler succeeded in carrying out so perfectly: "The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that nαzιsm is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm." (Letter of Pike to Mazzini)Let me spell this out for you: In order to maintain your position, you would have to claim that Hitler's actions played so perfectly into the plan of the Cabal NOT because he was obediently carrying out their plan, but because of... a coincidence. Just an amazing coincidence. Nothing more, and nothing less. That's your contention. And how believable is that? The bottom line is that you would have to literally rewrite history in order to successfully argue your position. Though if this was all the evidence against you, it might still be possible to convince the ignorant. But it's not. The truth is, there's a mountain of evidence opposing your "amazing coincidence" theory - beginning with the testimony of the "uneducated" Catholic Chancellor of Austria. You know what I'm talking about: actual docuмented evidence that Hitler's grandmother, Maria Anna Schicklgruber, was a young servant girl in the Viennese mansion of Baron Salomon Mayer Rothschild when she mysteriously became pregnant. And by who? Now there's a mystery! Hitler’s father, Alois, was born in 1837 in the period when (according to official records) Salomon Mayer was the only Rothschild who lived at the Vienna mansion. Even his wife did not live there because their marriage was so bad that she stayed in Frankfurt. Their son, Anselm Salomon spent most of his working life in Paris and Frankfurt away from Vienna and his father. Regarding Baron Rothschild's lust for young girls, Hermann von Goldschmidt, the son of Salomon Mayer’s senior clerk, says in a book he published in 1917: "…by the 1840s he had developed a somewhat reckless enthusiasm for young girls.."And again,"He had a lecherous passion for very young girls, his adventures with whom had to be hushed up by the police."And we go on. In his book, "The Mind of Hitler", author and psychoanalyst, Walter Langer, writes: "Adolf’s father, Alois Hitler, was the illegitimate son of Maria Anna Schicklgruber. It was generally supposed that the father of Alois Hitler (Schicklgruber) was Johann Georg Hiedler. There are some people who seriously doubt that Johann Georg Hiedler was the father of Alois… (an Austrian docuмent was) prepared that proved Maria Anna Schicklgruber was living in Vienna at the time she conceived. At that time she was employed as a servant in the home of Baron Rothschild. As soon as the family discovered her pregnancy she was sent back home... where Alois was born."Langer’s information, just quoted above, came from a book written by the high level Gestapo officer, Hansjurgen Koehler, which was published in 1940 under the title "Inside the Gestapo". Here Koehler writes about the investigations into Hitler’s background carried out by the Austrian Chancellor, Dolfuss, who researched the family files of Hitler. These same files were given to Koehler by Heydrich, the overlord of the nαzι Secret Service. The file, Koehler wrote, "caused such havoc as no file in the world ever caused before" (Inside the Gestapo, p 143). In his book, he writes:"..The second bundle in the blue file contained the docuмents collected by Dolfuss. The small statured, but big-hearted Austrian Chancellor must have known by such a personal file he might be able to check Hitler…His task was not difficult; as ruler of Austria he could easily find out about the personal data and family of Adolf Hitler, who had been born on Austrian soil..."Through the original birth certificates, police registration cards, protocols, etc., all contained in the original file, the Austrian Chancellor succeeded in piecing together the disjointed parts of the puzzle, creating a more or less logical entity. A little servant girl… (Hitler’s grandmother)… came to Vienna and became a domestic servant, mostly working for rather rich families. But she was unlucky; having been seduced, she was about to bear a child. She went home to her village for her confinement… Where was the little maid serving in Vienna? This was not a very difficult problem. Very early Vienna had instituted the system of compulsory police registration. Both servants and the employers were exposed to heavy fines if they neglected this duty. Chancellor Dolfuss managed to discover the registration card. The little, innocent maid had been a servant at the…Rothschild mansion. ..and Hitler’s unknown grandfather must be probably looked for in this magnificent house. The Dolfuss file stopped at this statement."All this to say, the evidence to support the position that Hitler WAS a Rothschild is fully docuмented. The primary information comes straight from the Catholic Chancellor of Austria, who found it himself in the records of the Viennese government. And yet, this is only the tip of the iceberg. As to his cooperation with the Rothschilds in founding a "Jєωιѕн" state in Israel, we know for a fact that Hitler signed the infamous Transfer Agreement (or Haavara Agreement) in 1933 with the Rothschild controlled Zionist Federation of Germany, to help create a "Jєωιѕн" state in Palestine. Probably just another amazing coincidence, right, DeLeg? Hitler wasn't actually working with the Zionists to help create a "Jєωιѕн" state in Israel. No. He was sleepwalking when he signed the deal.And what about Hitler's finances? Where did they come from? The very heart of Hitler’s war machine was the chemical giant, I.G. Farben, which had an American arm that was controlled by the Rothschilds through their lackeys, the Warburgs. Incidentally, when Allied troops entered Germany they found that the I.G. Farben factories, the very core of Hitler’s war operation, had not been hit by the mass bombing. At the same time, other factories nearby had been completely demolished by bombing raids. Another amazing coincidence.And we could go on, and on, and on. According to historian Thomas J. O'Keefe, Churchill said in his Memoirs that ex-German Chancellor (1930-1932) Heinrich Brüning revealed the identities of Hitler's backers in a 1937 letter: "I didn't, and do not even today for understandable reasons, wish to reveal from October 1928, the two largest regular contributors to the nαzι Party were the general managers of two of the largest Berlin banks, both of Jєωιѕн faith and one of them the leader of Zionism in Germany."
And I'll stop there. Entire books have been written exposing Hitler's financial backers - by very educated men - men more acquainted with the facts than even you. Like I said earlier, you haven't got a leg to stand on. As the official papers of the Viennese government prove, Hitler's father, Alois, was the illegitimate son of Baron Rothschild. Ergo, Adolph is a Rothschild. Do the math. Moreover, the incontestable fact that Hitler signed an agreement with the Rothschild controlled Zionists to help with the establishment of a Jєωιѕн state in Israel proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that he was in league with them in this plan. Hello? And finally, we have numerous books docuмenting the Rothschild's financial support of Hitler's war machine - whether through the Zionist controlled banks, or the institutions under the control of the Rothschilds. Again, you haven't got a leg to stand on.
But we don't even need to go this far. In order to maintain your position, you would have to first convince educated minds that the amazingly perfect connection between Hitler's actions, and the success of the Zionists' plans for the establishment of a "Jєωιѕн" state in Israel, are nothing but haphazard coincidence. For this to work, you would have to limit your preaching to those either miserably ignorant of the facts, or hopelessly naive. The only other option is to overturn history.