I still haven't seen any indication that it will be shown in any theaters outside that one Chicago theater in which it has been shown.

From the Facebook page:

We expect to open Los Angeles in the next few weeks, and possibly Dallas.

January is when we expect to be in a position to move into additional markets in which we can identify support:

http://www.theprinciplemovie.com/see-movie/bring-to-your-town/

I'm with Ladislaus on this one -- they should just "give it up" and release it on DVD already. That's the only feasible way to reach most people.

This obviously isn't going to be a wildly successful non-mainstream/independent film like "The Passion of the Christ". A lot of people saw that in theaters. That movie had a wider appeal, plus it had the name (and money) of Mel Gibson to back it up.

From the Facebook page:

Quote

We expect to open Los Angeles in the next few weeks, and possibly Dallas.

January is when we expect to be in a position to move into additional markets in which we can identify support:

http://www.theprinciplemovie.com/see-movie/bring-to-your-town/

I'm with Ladislaus on this one -- they should just "give it up" and release it on DVD already. That's the only feasible way to reach most people.

This obviously isn't going to be a wildly successful non-mainstream/independent film like "The Passion of the Christ". A lot of people saw that in theaters. That movie had a wider appeal, plus it had the name (and money) of Mel Gibson to back it up.

Yeah, I think that they're holding out for some kind of a "The Passion of the Christ" phenomenon that they had fantasized about, but it's just not realistically going to happen.  This could take off much better in a grass-roots kind of way.  Those of us who are seriously interested in the subject would pay a good amount of money for the DVD.  I'll just guess, though, that it'll be about 2018 before it shows up in a Cleveland theater.  I bought Sungenis' books on the subject and found them to be very interesting.

Quote from: Ladislaus

Quote from: roscoe

Quote from: Thurifer7

Has anyone seen The Principle Docuмentary movie? Reviews? Recommendation?

The movie attempts to tell us( like Luther, Calvin, James, Bacon etc) that S rev around E( which the Bible Does Not say.

My recommendation would be to avoid the lunatic flick.  :detective:

I'll put money on it that you haven't seen it, roscoe.

And i will bet that you have not read Copernicus--- or at least book I where the general theory is spelled out.

Is there Anyone in the Forum besides moi who has actually read Copernicus?  :smoke-pot:

I have roscoe, I have it here in front of me. It is also reviewed in the book THE EARTHMOVERS on this forum:

De revolutionibus itself, it is divided into six books. Such is its complexity and volume of writing and data that it is doubtful anyone ever read it all, let alone tried and tested its data and mechanisms. Truly it is a book compiled by dedicated mathematicians, containing thousands and thousands of words, opinions, numbers, equations and geometrical illustrations. But now let us take a glimpse inside it in order to see how well Copernicus knew the real problems in discerning the true universe:

There is another bit you must have read roscoe:

In April 1543, the first edition of De Revolutionibus arrived from Nuremberg. Copernicus, who had suffered a stroke two years earlier, had his copy placed on his bed. He died some hours later without comment. Rheticus however, opened it up only to find a preface entitled; To the Reader Concerning the Hypothesis of this Work, otherwise known as the ‘Ad lectorem’ introduction, it went like this:

‘And if it constructs and thinks up causes - and it has certainly thought up a good many - nevertheless it does not think them up in order to persuade anyone of their truth but only in order that they provide a correct basis for calculation…Maybe the philosopher demands probability instead; but neither of them will grasp anything certain or hand it on, unless it has been divinely revealed to him.’  

Given that Copernicus advanced astronomy not one star or one moon, and nothing in his book could be verified empirically, how did his model take hold in science as a truth, as the true scientific order of the world we live in?


Answer; because the roscoes of this world do/did not know the difference between a theory and a fact.