Author Topic: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism (Read 1470 times)

Mark 79 · « **on:** October 02, 2019, 05:56:20 PM »

"The Necessity of Anti-Semitism"
ANDREW JOYCE • SEPTEMBER 27, 2019
• 6,400 WORDS • 140 COMMENTS • REPLY

http://www.unz.com/article/the-necessity-of-anti-semitism/

RSS

Quote

“There has always been an abyss between Europeans and Semites, since the time when Tacitus complained about the odium generis humani.”
Heinrich von Treitschke, Ein Wort über unser Judenthum, 1879.

In 1989, the Jєωιѕн screenwriter and journalist Frederic Raphael was invited to deliver the 25th Anniversary Lecture at the University of Southampton’s Parkes Institute for the study of Jєωιѕн/non-Jєωιѕн relations. Founded by Rev Dr James Parkes(1896–1981), a neurotic Church of England minister who made a career out of the promotion of philo-Semitism in Christianity and the promotion of guilt narratives among Christians (in 1935 he was both celebrated by Jєωs and targeted for assassination by National Socialists), the Institute quickly became a hub for the production of scholarly-appearing pro-Jєωιѕн propaganda. Rather than offering objective analyses of Jєωιѕн/non-Jєωιѕн relations, the Institute furthered the familiar narrative that Jєωs were the blameless and catastrophic victims of an entirely irrational European hatred. Raphael, given the honor of addressing the 25th anniversary of this project, opted on the appointed evening to be a witty gadfly, choosing “The Necessity of Anti-Semitism” as the title of his address. It could be the title of a book, said Raphael, one that could sit in the Parkes Institute library but for the fact it had never been written, and did not exist.…

The Culture of Critique

The section titled ‘Culture of Critique’ is a both a nod to the work of Kevin MacDonald, and an expansion upon the same. Setting out this section, our author might recall the notorious remark of the Jєωιѕн historian Louis Namier (1888–1960) when asked why he did not deal with Jєωιѕн history: “The Jєωs do not have a history, they have a martyrology.” It is this martyrology that lies at the heart of the Culture of Critique. Whereas almost every nation possesses a history that is in most respects objective, the Jєωs alone possess a mere quasi-history, riddled with mythic and esoteric self-deceptions that give psychological permission for the most clannish and subversive of social behaviors and the most hostile of attitudes towards other peoples. The Culture of Critique, a kind of cultural revenge inspired by the Jєωιѕн martyrology, is the clearest expression of the corrosive nature of the disastrous Jєωιѕн/non-Jєωιѕн relations so mourned by the woefully misguided Rev James Parkes.…
The Culture of Tolerance

This section might open with the remark that the Culture of Tolerance is itself a child of the Culture of Critique. When did Jєωs first start calling for Whites to abolish themselves in their own lands? Our author might argue that they began right at the first Jєωιѕн entry into European culture — not European lands, but European culture. Isn’t it Moses Mendelssohn (1729–1786) who is often held up as the first “assimilated” Jєω, the first real Jєωιѕн intellectual who wanted to be ‘part of German culture’ and who advocated for “tolerance”? Well, what did Mendelssohn, the first “German of the Jєωιѕн faith,” actually ask Europeans to do? That much is clear, and a matter of historical record. He impudently and impatiently asked, “For how long, for how many millennia, must this distinction between the owners of the land and the stranger continue? Would it not be better for mankind and culture to obliterate this distinction?”[3] [emphasis added].…

From the very beginning of Jєωιѕн activism in Western culture, it was in the interest of Jєωs to undermine the position of the owners of the land and to promote “tolerance.” It was Mendelssohn’s 1781 work, On the Civil Amelioration of the Condition of the Jєωs, that is said to have played a significant part in the rise of “tolerance” in Western culture. But tolerance, despite all the glowing propaganda, is a curious word. Place it in a medical context, and tolerance means “the immunological state marked by unresponsiveness to a specific toxin or other foreign substance which induces an immune response in the body, especially the production of antibodies.”

And isn’t this exactly what Mendelssohn prescribed almost two and half centuries ago— that the owners of the land should be “unresponsive,” suppressing all natural “immune responses” even in the face of intruding toxins? We have to ask ourselves how tolerance ever became regarded as a virtue. The answer is that it became a virtue in the context of the Jєωιѕн intrusion into Western culture.…

The Culture of Sterility
Jєωs are everywhere in the Culture of Sterility, an appropriate term for what the world’s leading scholars have described as the “rapid increase” in “levels of childlessness in most European countries.”[4] Our author could start with the fact the oral contraceptive was invented by the Jєω Gregory Goodwin Pincus, but really Jєωs have everywhere in the West been, to use the Jєωιѕн historian Howard Sachar’s own words, “pioneers in the underground contraceptives industry.”[5] By plan, co-ordination, or raw instinct, Jєωs have accuмulated in those areas toxic to the White birth rate — contraception, abortion, divorce laws, and the promotion of pornography, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity, gender confusion, and promiscuity.
The pioneers of abortion clinics, birth control literature for couples, and birth control policy measures in America were, according to one scholar, “Anna Samuelson in the Bronx; Olga Ginzburg and Rachelle Yarros in Chicago; Sarah Marcus in Cleveland; Nadine Kavinoky and Rochelle Seletz in Los Angeles; Esther Cohen and Golda Nobel in Philadelphia; Hannah Stone, Marie Warner, Cheri Appel, Anna Spielgeman, Naomi Yarmolinsky, Bessie Moses in Baltimore, Elizabeth Kleinman in Boston, and Lena Levine in New York, Hannah Seitzwick-Robbins in Trenton, and Lucile Lord-Heinstein in Massachusetts.”[6] All of these women were Jєωs. Stone was particularly influential, working closely with Sanger and producing key birth control texts like Contraceptive Methods of Choice (1926), Therapeutic Contraception (1928), Contraception and Mental Hygiene (1933), and Birth Control: A Practical Survey (1937).
In the 1920s and 1930s, the primary lawyer for Margaret Sanger, the non-Jєωιѕн public face of the pro-abortion and birth-control movement in New York, was the Jєω Morris Ernst. And when Sanger decided to move for Federal birth control legislation, she wrote to Rabbi Stephen Wise in 1931 asking him to use Jєωιѕн political influence and his own extensive list of political contacts to help make it happen, a request he happily obliged.[7]
Of course, Sanger had married a Jєω, and according to one biographer “surrounded herself with Jєωιѕн colleagues and friends.”[8]
In fact, Jєωιѕн influence is so tightly bound up with the origins of abortion in America that historian Daniel K. Williams has characterized the abortion debate of the 1930s as a “religious conflict because nearly all the doctors speaking out against abortion were Catholic while the most vocal proponents of abortion legalization were Jєωιѕн.”[9]Williams adds the fact “Reform Jєωιѕн rabbis also became early leaders in the abortion law liberalisation movement.”[10]
The link between Jєωιѕн organizations and the more sordid (and often Jєωιѕн-dominated) corners of the medical profession came into stark relief during investigations into illegal abortions in the 1940s and 1950s, when the crossover was such that, according to historian Leslie J. Reagan, local authorities in New York, found “pro-birth control and Jєωιѕн organisations of particular interest.”[11] By the time Pincus developed the Pill, he was sufficiently aware of the potential for birth control and Jєωιѕн activism to be linked in the popular mind that he deliberately selected John Rock, a Catholic, rather than Abraham Stone and Alan Guttmacher, long-term colleagues and leaders of the birth control movement, to develop a contraceptive regimen in women, in order to avoid “anti-Semitic stigma.”[12]
The same pattern has been repeated in every other Western nation. Alan Shatter may have acted as chief propagandist for birth control legislation in Ireland in the 1970s, but even a century before Shatter’s actions a member of the Irish clergy reported:

Quote

There arrived in town a Jєω with a lorry [ … ] and he started selling contraceptives made up as pencil holders . … Someone told the parish priest about the traffic . … He notified the police who could do nothing. He then set up a court of his own and tried him and fined him £10. The Jєω paid £10 and cleared out.[13]

[color][size][font][size][font]

In New York, Jєωs like Moses Jacobi and Morris Glattstine were particularly influential and conspicuous in the sale of illicit contraceptives and in the underground abortion scene as early as the 1870s.[14] Similarly, during the late nineteenth century, “Jєωs were among the leaders of the revolution in birth control in southern Germany.”[15] In interwar Germany, according to scholar Harriet Freidenreich, “Jєωιѕн women physicians played a very prominent role in the campaign to legalise abortion. … Jєωιѕн women physicians were disproportionately involved in the sex reform movement that promoted more widespread availability of birth control. They were very visible in the dissemination of contraceptive devices.”[16]…
The Culture of Usury
In a West gone wildly materialistic, it can be difficult to see the extent of Jєωιѕн usury. When you mention Jєωιѕн moneylenders to most people, the response normally relates to the Middle Ages. But Jєωιѕн usury is alive and well in modernity, and entire countries are in debt to Jєωιѕн financiers, who then pass on some of their wealth to Jєωιѕн organizations dedicated to the promotion of the three other cultures of White decline (Critique, Tolerance, Sterility). Paul Singer, of the Jєωιѕн “investment fund” has been described by Bloomberg as “The World’s Most Feared Investor,” but really he’s the world’s most feared exploiter of debt. The Democratic Republic of Congo owes Singer and his Jєωιѕн colleagues $90 million, Panama owes him $57 million, Peru owes him $58 million, and Argentina owes him $1.5 billion. When payments have been late, Singer seized and detained the flagship of the Argentinian Navy, and when South Korea put up a fight to prevent him getting control of Samsung, he drove the nation’s President to impeachment and imprisonment.
While these activities may appear very high-level, and distant from the reality of day-to-day life (unless you are a citizen of the Congo and Singer is blackmailing you for payment by withholding essential work on your water supply), Singer and his Jєωιѕн financial clique have a hand in almost every purchase you make, and every war your country wages. Singer, his son Gordin, and their colleagues Zion Shohet, Jesse Cohn, Stephen Taub, Elliot Greenberg and Richard Zabel, have a foothold in almost every country, and have a stake in every company you’re likely to be familiar with, from book stores to dollar stores. With the profits of exploitation, they fund the Culture of Sterility, boost Zionist politics, invest millions in security for Jєωs, and promote wars for Israel. Singer is a Republican, and is on the Board of the Republican Jєωιѕн Coalition. He is a former board member of the Jєωιѕн Institute for National Security Affairs, has funded neoconservative research groups like the Middle East Media Research Institute and the Center for Security Policy, and is among the largest funders of the neoconservative Foundation for Defense of Democracies. He was also connected to the pro-Iraq War advocacy group Freedom’s Watch. Another key Singer project was the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI), a Washington D.C.-based advocacy group that was founded in 2009 by several high-profile Jєωιѕн neoconservative figures to promote militaristic U.S. policies in the Middle East on behalf of Israel and which received its seed money from Singer.
Although Singer was initially anti-Trump, and although Trump once attacked Singerfor his pro-immigration politics (“Paul Singer represents amnesty and he represents illegal immigration pouring into the country”), Trump is now essentially funded by three Jєωs—Singer, Bernard Marcus, and Sheldon Adelson, together accounting for over $250 million in pro-Trump political money. In return, they want war with Iran. Employees of Singer’s firm, Elliott Management, were one of the main sources of funding for the 2014 candidacy of the Senate’s most outspoken Iran hawk, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), who urged Trump to conduct a “retaliatory strike” against Iran for purportedly attacking two commercial tankers. These exploitative Jєωιѕн financiers have been clear that they expect a war with Iran, and they are lobbying hard and preparing to call in their pound of flesh. As one political commentator put it, “These donors have made their policy preferences on Iran plainly known. They surely expect a return on their investment in Trump’s GOP.” When Adelson and Singer first made overtures to Marco Rubio, Trump tweeted that Rubio would be their “puppet.” Trump has now taken money from the same puppetmasters, but has thus far refused to go “all the way” with their demands, even firing John Bolton, a favorite of the Jєωιѕн triad. How the latter will proceed in the face of Trump’s defiance on the matter remains to be seen.

The Intersection of the Culture of Usury and the Culture of Zio-Wars: Paul Singer, Bernard Marcus, and Sheldon Adelson

The Jєωιѕн triad behind Trump is a perfect example of the role of Jєωιѕн finance and the Culture of Usury in sustaining and advancing Jєωιѕн power and influence in contemporary society. Singer embodies usury and vulture capitalism, while Bernard “Home Depot” Marcus is symptomatic of bloated consumerism, and Adelson represents the sordid commercial exploitation of vice (gambling). There is nothing productive in the economic activity of any of these figures, their vast accuмulations arising from sociopathic parasitism, ethnic nepotism, and the will to cultural decay.
We feel this decay lower down the scale, since we live in a society of conspicuous consumption, funded by ever-escalating household debt. Everywhere, people buy things they don’t need with money they don’t have. Household debt is rising yet again in the United States. According to the New York Federal Reserve, Americans owe $13.86 trillion in household debt, slightly higher than the total amount right before the 2008 financial crisis. In Australia, the household debt to income ratio is above 190%, among the highest in the developed world. The same situation is seen in the U.K. Jєωs, of course, were involved disproportionately in the development of department stores, the fashion industry, retailing business, and other aspects of the consumer society.[22] Jєωs in late nineteenth-century Germany, as they did in several other Western countries, initiated the “consumer revolution,” and “held, or at least started, the overwhelming majority of department stores and clothing and fashion houses throughout the country.”[23] Werner Sombart remarked at the time that department stores were the herald of a new, degenerative economic culture, typified by “the anonymous, objectifying forces of capitalism and marketing.” Contemporary αnтι-ѕємιтєs saw these centers of the economic culture as “a consuming temple in two senses, as both a temple of consumption and a temple that consumes — that is, a place of destruction, a Moloch even, that greedily devours vulnerable customers and neighbouring businesses.”[24]

Today, largely worthless “branded” consumer products are overwhelmingly Jєωιѕн, are promoted via Jєωιѕн dominance of the advertising industry, and their purchase by consumers is funded by Jєωιѕн financiers. Calvin Klein, Levi Strauss, Ralph Lauren, Michael Kors, Kenneth Cole, Max Factor, Estée Lauder, and Marc Jacobs are just some of the Jєωs whose very names have become synonymous with debt-fueled consumer culture and the subscribing to carefully cultivated fashion fads, while Jєωιѕн-owned companies like Starbucks, Macy’s, the Gap, American Apparel, Costco, Staples, Home Depot, Ben & Jerry’s, Timberland, Snapple, Häagen-Dazs, Dunkin’ Donuts, Monster Beverages, Mattel, and Toys “R” Us have come to epitomize the endless and superfluous production of garbage for mass consumption on credit.
The consuming temple of debt-fueled consumerism is also linked to the cultures of Critique, Tolerance, and Sterility. So-called anti-racism, support for gender confusion, and the celebration of mass migration and multiculturalism have become mainstays of modern advertising as the Racial Endgame nears its conclusion and the West commences its death rattle.

You might ask what tortilla chips have to do with sodomy, but that’s only because you’re suffering from a tolerance deficiency, and the best way to correct that is to admit White privilege, buy a Starbucks, and go try on a new pair of $200 jeans at Macy’s.
Conclusion
Critique, Tolerance, Sterility and Usury have converged. This is the necessity of anti-Semitism. As much as The Necessity of Anti-Semitism has haunted me, so too has the image of Goedsche’s Rabbi addressing the graveyard meeting of thirteen elders. It haunts me because it appears so antiquated and naive, as if the situation could ever have been so simple. The reality has always been much more profound, and infinitely more dangerous. The Jєωιѕн Question, such as it might exist for Jєωs, has always amounted to “Is it good for the Jєωs?” For Whites, it should always have been “Are the Jєωs good for us?” An answer might be found in their accuмulation in their four aspects of White decline. Our opposition to this accuмulation and its associated activities is perfectly logical, and morally necessary.
Notes
[1] F. Raphael, The Necessity of Anti-Semitism (London: Carcanet, 1997), 49.
[2] D. Dresser and L. Friedman, American Jєωιѕн Filmmakers (University of Illinois, 2004), 7.
[3] M. Mendelssohn, “Anmerkung zu des Ritters Michaelis Beurtheilung des ersten Teils von Dohm, über die bürgerliche Verbesserung der Juden,” (1783), Moses Mendelssohn gesammelte Schriften, ed. G. B. Mendelssohn (Leipzig, 1843), vol. 3, 367.
[4] M. Kreyenfeld Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, Causes, and Consequences(Cham: SpringerOpen, 2017), v.
[5] Cited in T. Russell, A Renegade History of the United States (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010).
[6] M. R. Klapper Ballots, Babies, and Banners of Peace: American Jєωιѕн Women’s Activism, 1890-1940 (New York: New York University Press, 2013), 151.
[7] Ibid, 159.
[8] E. Chesler Woman of Valor: Margaret Sanger and the Birth Control Movement in America (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2007), 51.
[9] D. K. Williams Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement Before Roe v Wade (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 27.
[10] Ibid, 66.
[11] L. J. Reagan When Abortion Was a Crime: Women, Medicine, and Law in the United States, 1867-1973 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), 173.
[12] J. Reed The Birth Control Movement and American Society (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), 351.
[13] M. P. Leone Atlantic Crossings in the Wake of Frederick Douglass (Leiden: Brill, 2017), 111.
[14] J. F. Brodie Contraception and Abortion in Nineteenth-century America (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994), 234.
[15] A. C. Crombie (ed) History of Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), 371.
[16] H. P. Freidenreich Female, Jєωιѕн, and Educated: The Lives of Central European University Women (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002), 154.
[17] Y. Hashamova (ed) Transgressive Women in Modern Russian and East European Cultures: From the Bad to the Blasphemous (New York: Routledge, 2017), 16.
[18] R. Blobaum, Antisemitism and Its Opponents in Modern Poland (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005), 87.
[19] R. Modras The Catholic Church and Antisemitism: Poland, 1933-39 (New York: Routledge, 2004), 62.
[20] N. Las Jєωιѕн Voices in Feminism: Transnational Perspectives (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2015), 91.
[21] E.R. Dickson, Sex, Freedom and Power in Imperial Germany, 1880-1914(Cambridge University Press, 2014), 7.
[22] G. Reuveni, Consumer Culture and the Making of Modern Jєωιѕн Identity(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), xiii.
[23] P. Lerner, The Consuming Temple: Jєωs, Department Stores, and the Consumer Revolution in Germany, 1880-1940 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2015), 5.

[24] Ibid, 9.[/font][/size]
[/font][/size][/color]

Syracuse · « **Reply #1 on:** October 02, 2019, 09:56:48 PM »

poche · « **Reply #2 on:** October 03, 2019, 01:55:08 AM »

From Pope Pius XI;

8. Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community - however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things - whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds.

http://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/docuмents/hf_p-xi_enc_14031937_mit-brennender-sorge.html

Mark 79 · « **Reply #3 on:** October 03, 2019, 06:03:32 AM »

St. John Chrysostom, First Homily Adversus Judaeos: “Many, I know, respect the Jєωs and think that their present way of life is a venerable one. This is why I hasten to uproot and tear out this deadly opinion. I said that the ѕуηαgσgυє is no better than a theater and I bring forward a prophet as my witness. Surely the Jєωs are not more deserving of belief than their prophets. ‘You had a harlot's brow; you became shameless before all.’ Where a harlot has set herself up, that place is a brothel. But the ѕуηαgσgυє is not only a brothel and a theater; it also is a den of robbers and a lodging for wild beasts. Jeremiah said: ‘Your house has become for me the den of a hyena.’ He does not simply say ‘of wild beast,’ but ‘of a filthy wild beast,’ and again: ‘I have abandoned my house, I have cast off my inheritance.’ But when God forsakes a people, what hope of salvation is left? When God forsakes a place, that place becomes the dwelling of demons.”

Incredulous · « **Reply #4 on:** October 03, 2019, 06:03:54 AM »

Merry · « **Reply #5 on:** October 03, 2019, 08:47:44 AM »

Read Philip II by W.T. Walsh if you want some real eye openers about what took place in Spain at that time.

Mark 79 · « **Reply #6 on:** October 03, 2019, 04:47:29 PM »

Longhurst, John Edward. “The Ritual Murder of La Guardia,”
The Age of Torquemada. The Library of Iberian Resources Online, XI: 149-152.
http://libro.uca.edu/torquemada/torquemada11.htm

See also:

The Last Crusader: Isabella of Spain by William Thomas Walsh (Rockford IL: Tan Books, 1987) Chapter 25, “The Crucifixion of the Holy Child of La Guardia Hastens Isabel’s Decision to Expel All the Jєωs from Spain - a Cause Célèbre,” 342-372

poche · « **Reply #7 on:** October 06, 2019, 12:24:32 AM »

What you are suggesting is a contradiction to Pope St Pius X.

I have always been on good terms with Jєωs. Only the other evening two Jєωs were here to see me. After all, there are other bonds than those of religion: courtesy and philanthropy. These we do not deny to the Jєωs. Indeed, we also pray for them: that their minds be enlightened.

https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904

Mark 79 · « **Reply #8 on:** October 06, 2019, 12:28:04 AM »

Quote from: poche on October 06, 2019, 12:24:32 AM

What you are suggesting is a contradiction to Pope St Pius X.

I have always been on good terms with Jєωs. Only the other evening two Jєωs were here to see me. After all, there are other bonds than those of religion: courtesy and philanthropy. These we do not deny to the Jєωs. Indeed, we also pray for them: that their minds be enlightened.

https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904

Your half-truths/partial quotes are complete lies.

Doctors of the Church

St. Alphonsus Maria Liguori The Passion and Death of Jesus Christ, page 444: “Poor Jєωs! You invoked a dreadful curse upon your own heads in saying: ‘His blood be upon us and our children’; and that curse, miserable race, you carry upon you to this day, and to the End of Time you shall endure the chastisement of that innocent blood.”

St. Jerome, Epist. 151, ad Algasiam, question II: “The Jєωs, after having despised the truth in person, will receive lies in receiving the Antichrist.”

St. Ambrose, Sermo 37, The Two Ships: “The faithlessness of the ѕуηαgσgυє is an insult to the Savior. Therefore He chose the barque of Peter, and deserted that of Moses; that is, He rejected the faithless ѕуηαgσgυє, and adopts the believing Church.”

St. Ambrose, in The Great Commentary of Cornelius a Lapide, Vol. 3, page 311: “O Jєωιѕн hearts, harder than rocks!”

St. Ambrose, Enarratio on Psalms XLIII: “This shows that the Jєωs, who did not want to believe in Jesus Christ, will believe in the Antichrist.”

St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Letter #363: “The Jєωs must not be persecuted or chased like beasts....They are living signs that remind us of the Passion of our Lord. Besides, they are scattered through the world so that, while they pay for such a crime, they can be the witnesses of our redemption.”

St. Bernard of Clairvaux, SS: “O intelligence coarse, dense, and cow-like, which did not recognize God even in His own works! Perhaps the Jєω will complain that I call his intelligence bovine, but his intelligence is less than bovine: ‘The ox knows his Owner, and the ass knows his Master's crib, but Israel has not known Me, and My people have not understood’ (Isaias 1:3). You see, O Jєω, I am easier on you than your own prophet!”

St. Cyril of Alexandria: “It has come to pass that the last state of Israel is worse than the first for, as the Savior's disciples says (II Peter 2:21, 22), it would be better for them not to have known the way of justice than, after they have known it, to turn back from that holy commandment which was delivered to them. For that of the true proverb has happened to them: the dog has returned to his vomit, and the sow that was washed has returned to wallowing in the mire (Proverbs 26:11). And from what they afterwards dared to do, it is plain to see that they have swallowed their vomit and have turned again to wallow in their ancient mire and have lapsed into the errors of Egypt, for the evil spirit has again entered into them, and their last state has become worse than their first.”

St. Ephrem: “What is your iniquity, O daughter of Jacob, that your chastisement is so severe? You have dishonored the King and the King's Son, you shameless one, you harlot!”

St. Gregory nαzιanzen: “If anyone does not worship the Crucified One, let him be anathema and numbered among the deicides.”

St. John Chrysostom, Homily on Romans, 6:12: “Yet surely Paul’s object everywhere is to annul this Law… And with much reason; for it was through a fear and a horror of this that the Jєωs obstinately opposed grace.”

St. John Chrysostom, Homily on Galatians, Ch 3: “And so while no one annuls a man's covenant, the covenant of God after four hundred and thirty years is annulled; for if not that covenant but another instead of it bestows what is promised, then is it set aside, which is most unreasonable” … “How dare Christians have the slightest intercourse with Jєωs, those most miserable of all men who are lustful, rapacious, greedy, perfidious bandits, pests of the universe! Indeed, an entire day would not suffice to tell of all their huckstering. Are they not inveterate murderers, destroyers, men possessed by the devil? They are impure and impious, and their ѕуηαgσgυє is a house of prostitution, a lair of beasts, a place of shame and ridicule, the domicile of the devil, as also the soul of the Jєω. As a matter of fact, Jєωs worship the devil: their rites are criminal and impure; their religion a disease; their ѕуηαgσgυє an assembly of crooks, a den of thieves, a cavern of devils, an abyss of perdition. Why are the Jєωs degenerated? Because of their hateful assassination of Christ. This supreme crime lies at the root of their degradation and their woes. The rejection and dispersion of the Jєωs was the work of God, not of emperors. It was done by the wrath of God and because of His absolute abandonment of the Jєωs. Thus the Jєωs will live under the yoke of slavery without end. God hates the Jєωs, and on Judgment Day He will say to those who sympathize with them: ‘Depart from Me, for you had intercourse with My murderers!’ Flee, then, from their assemblies, fly from their houses, and, far from venerating the ѕуηαgσgυє, hold it in hatred and aversion.”

St. John Chrysostom, First Homily Adversus Judaeos: “Many, I know, respect the Jєωs and think that their present way of life is a venerable one. This is why I hasten to uproot and tear out this deadly opinion. I said that the ѕуηαgσgυє is no better than a theater and I bring forward a prophet as my witness. Surely the Jєωs are not more deserving of belief than their prophets. ‘You had a harlot's brow; you became shameless before all.’ Where a harlot has set herself up, that place is a brothel. But the ѕуηαgσgυє is not only a brothel and a theater; it also is a den of robbers and a lodging for wild beasts. Jeremiah said: ‘Your house has become for me the den of a hyena.’ He does not simply say ‘of wild beast,’ but ‘of a filthy wild beast,’ and again: ‘I have abandoned my house, I have cast off my inheritance.’ But when God forsakes a people, what hope of salvation is left? When God forsakes a place, that place becomes the dwelling of demons.”

St. John Chrysostom, Catena Aurea, Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 27: “Observe here the infatuation of the Jєωs; their headlong haste, and destructive passions will not let them see what they ought to see, and they curse themselves, saying, ‘His blood be upon us,’ and even entail the curse upon their children. Yet a merciful God did not ratify this sentence, but accepted such of them and of their children as repented; for Paul was of them, and many thousands of those who in Jerusalem believed.”

St. John Chrysostom, Homily II:
“…(6) I have spoken these words to you. You will speak them to those Judaizers, and they to their wives. ‘Fortify one another.’ If a catechumen is sick with this disease, let him be kept outside the church doors. If the sick one be a believer and already initiated, let him be driven from the holy table. For not all sins need exhortation and counsel; some sins, of their very nature, demand cure by a quick and sharp excision. The wounds we can tolerate respond to more gentle cures; those which have festered and cannot be cured, those which are feeding on the rest of the body, need cauterization with a point of steel. So is it with sins. Some need long exhortation; others need sharp rebuke.
“(7) This is why Paul did not enjoin us to exhort in every case but also to rebuke sharply: ‘Wherefore rebuke them sharply.’ Therefore, I will now rebuke them sharply, so that they may accuse themselves and feel shame for what they have done. Then they will never again be hurt by that sinful fast.
“(8 ) So I shall put aside exhortation henceforth as I testify and exclaim: ‘If any man does not love the Lord Jesus Christ, let a curse be upon him.’ What greater evidence could there be that a man does not love our Lord than when he participates in the festival with those who slew Christ? It was not I who hurled the curse at them, but Paul. Rather, it was not Paul but Christ, who spoke through him and said earlier: ‘Those who are justified in the law have fallen away from grace.’
“(9) So speak these words to them, read aloud to them these texts. Show all your zeal in saving them. When you have snatched them from the devil’s jaws, bring them to me on the day of the Jєωιѕн fast. Then, after I have kept the rest of my promise to you, let us, with one accord and with one voice, join our brothers in giving glory to God and the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, for to Him is glory forever. Amen.”

St. Augustine, Letters, 74, 4: “Instead of the grace of the law which has passed away, we have received the grace of the gospel which is abiding; and instead of the shadows and types of the old dispensation, the truth has come by Jesus Christ. Jeremiah also prophesied thus in God’s name: ‘Behold, the days come, says the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah...’ Observe what the prophet says, not to Gentiles, who had not been partakers in any former covenant, but to the Jєωιѕн nation. He who has given them the law by Moses, promises in place of it the New Covenant of the gospel, that they might no longer live in the oldness of the letter, but in the newness of the spirit.”

St. Augustine, in The Anguish of the Jєωs by Fr Edward Flannery, Macmillan, 1954 (cf), and in The Faith of the Early Fathers by Fr Jurgens, Collegeville, 1979: “Judaism, since Christ, is a corruption; indeed, Judas is the image of the Jєωιѕн people: their understanding of Scripture is carnal; they bear the guilt for the death of the Savior, for through their fathers they have killed Christ. The Jєωs held Him; the Jєωs insulted Him; the Jєωs bound Him; they crowned Him with thorns and dishonored Him by spitting upon Him; they scourged Him; they heaped abuses on Him; they hung Him upon a tree.”

St. Augustine, Sermon 91, PL38:567: “Our Lord Jesus Christ referred to Himself as ‘the Stone’ (Mt. 21:44). Lying on the ground, it shakes whoever falls over it; coming from on high, it crushes the proud. The Jєωs have already been shaken by their previous stumble. What awaits them is to be crushed by His Coming.”

St. Augustine, “Against the Jєωs,” PL 42:51: “The Jєωs wander over the entire earth, their backs bent over and their eyes cast downward, forever calling to our minds the curse they carry with them.”

St. Basil the Great, “On Prayer,” Sermon IX, PG 32; SS vol.II p.384: “If someone should kill the beloved son of a man, and then stretch forth their hands still stained with blood to the afflicted father, asking for fellowship, would not the blood of his son, visible on the hand of his murderer, provoke him to just anger instead? And such are the prayers of the Jєωs, for when they stretch forth their hands in prayer, they only remind God the Father of their sin against His Son. And at every stretching-forth of their hands, they only make it obvious that they are stained with the blood of Christ. For they who persevere in their blindness inherit the blood-guilt of their fathers; for they cried out: ‘His blood be upon us, and upon our children’ (Matthew xxvii.25).”

St. Thomas Aquinas, De Regimine Judaeorum: “It would be licit, according to custom, to hold Jєωs in perpetual servitude because of their crime.”

Saints

Pope St. Pius V, Hebraeorum gens: “The Jєωιѕн people fell from the heights because of their faithlessness and condemned their Redeemer to a shameful death. Their godlessness has assumed such forms that, for the salvation of our own people, it becomes necessary to prevent their disease. Besides usury, through which Jєωs everywhere have sucked dry the property of impoverished Christians, they are accomplices of thieves and robbers; and the most damaging aspect of the matter is that they allure the unsuspecting through magical incantations, superstition, and witchcraft to the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan and boast of being able to predict the future. We have carefully investigated how this revolting sect abuses the name of Christ and how harmful they are to those whose life is threatened by their deceit. On account of these and other serious matters, and because of the gravity of their crimes which increase day to day more and more, We order that, within 90 days, all Jєωs in our entire earthly realm of justice -- in all towns, districts, and places -- must depart these regions.”

St. Padre Pio, in the Calvary of Padre Pio by Joseph Pagnossin, 1978 Padua, Italy, page 91: “The Jєωs are enemies of God and foes of our holy religion.”

St. Gregory of Nyssa: “Jєωs are slayers of the Lord, murderers of the prophets, enemies and haters of God, adversaries of grace, enemies of their father's faith, advocates of the devil, a brood of vipers, slanderers, scoffers, men of darkened minds, the leaven of Pharisees, a congregation of demons, sinners, wicked men, haters of goodness!”

St. Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, Ch 11: Now, law placed against law has abrogated that which is before it, and a covenant which comes after in like manner has put an end to the previous one; and an eternal and final law – namely, Christ – has been given to us, and the covenant is trustworthy…Have you not read…by Jeremiah, concerning this same new covenant, He thus speaks: ‘Behold, the days come,’ says the Lord, ‘that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah…’”

St. Justin Martyr, Florilegium Patristicuм, Rauschen, 1911: “Those of the seed of Abraham who live according to the Law of Moses and who do not believe in Christ before death shall not be saved; especially they who curse this very Christ in the ѕуηαgσgυєs; who curse everything by which they might obtain salvation and escape the vengeance of fire.”

St.Vincent Ferrer, himself a convert from Judaism: “One who dies a Jєω will be damned!”

St. Vincent Ferrer, ACS p.82; “Since His spouse, the ѕуηαgσgυє, refused to receive Him, Christ answered: ‘This is a harlot!’ and gave her a bill of divorce.”

St. Felix of Toledo, On the Condemnation of the Jєωs, Council XVII of Toledo, Spain, Canon No. 8: “It is known that the Jєωιѕн people are polluted with wickedness, blasphemy, and the shedding of the blood of Jesus Christ so that their wickedness has no limit.”

St. Barnabas, attributed: “Do not add to your sins by saying that the Covenant is both theirs and ours. Yes, it is ours, but they lost it forever.”

St. Hippolytus, Against the Jєωs, God’s condemnation upon the Deicide of Perfidious Judaism is eternal:
“…5. Listen with understanding, O Jєω, to what the Christ says: ‘They gave me gall for my meat; and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink.’ And these things He did indeed endure from you. Hear the Holy Ghost tell you also what return He made to you for that little portion of vinegar. For the prophet says, as in the person of God, ‘Let their table become a snare and retribution.’ Of what retribution does He speak? Manifestly, of the misery which has now got hold of thee.
“6. And then hear what follows: ‘Let their eyes be darkened, that they see not.’ And surely ye have been darkened in the eyes of your soul with a darkness utter and everlasting. For now that the true light has arisen, ye wander as in the night, and stumble on places with no roads, and fall headlong, as having forsaken the way that saith, ‘I am the way.” - John xiv. 6. Furthermore, hear this yet more serious word: ‘And their back do thou bend always’; that means, in order that they may be slaves to the nations, not four hundred and thirty years as in Egypt, nor seventy as in Babylon, but bend them to servitude, he says, ‘always.’ In fine, then, how dost thou indulge vain hopes, expecting to be delivered from the misery which holdeth thee? For that is somewhat strange. And not unjustly has he imprecated this blindness of eyes upon thee. But because thou didst cover the eyes of Christ, (and) thus thou didst beat Him, for this reason, too, bend thou thy back for servitude always. And whereas thou didst pour out His blood in indignation, hear what thy recompense shall be: ‘Pour out Thine indignation upon them, and let Thy wrathful anger take hold of them’; and, ‘Let their habitation be desolate,’ to wit, their celebrated temple.
“7. But why… was the temple made desolate? … but it was because they killed the Son of their Benefactor, for He is coeternal with the Father. Whence He saith, ‘Father, let their temple be made desolate’; Cf. Matt. xxiii. 38. for they have persecuted Him whom Thou didst of Thine own will smite for the salvation of the world; that is, they have persecuted me with a violent and unjust death, ‘and they have added to the pain of my wounds.’ In former time, as the Lover of man, I had pain on account of the straying of the Gentiles; but to this pain they have added another, by going also themselves astray. Wherefore ‘add iniquity to their iniquity, and tribulation to tribulation, and let them not enter into Thy righteousness,’ that is, into Thy kingdom; but ‘let them be blotted out of the book of the living, and not be written with the righteous,’ that is, with their holy fathers and patriarchs.
“8. What sayest thou to this, O Jєω? It is neither Matthew nor Paul that saith these things, but David, thine anointed, who awards and declares these terrible sentences on account of Christ. And like the great Job, addressing you who speak against the righteous and true, he says, ‘Thou didst barter the Christ like a slave, thou didst go to Him like a robber in the garden.’
“9. I produce now the prophecy of Solomon, which speaketh of Christ, and announces clearly and perspicuously things concerning the Jєωs; and those which not only are befalling them at the present time, but those, too, which shall befall them in the future age, on account of the contumacy and audacity which they exhibited toward the Prince of Life; for the prophet says, The ungodly said, … about Christ, ‘Let us lie in wait for the righteous, because he is not for our turn, and he is clean contrary to our doings and words, and upbraideth us with our offending the law, and professeth to have knowledge of God; and he calleth himself the Child of God.’ Wisd. ii. 1, 12, 13. And then he says, ‘He is grievous to us even to behold; for his life is not like other men’s, and his ways are of another fashion. We are esteemed of him as counterfeits, and he abstaineth from our ways as from filthiness, and pronounceth the end of the just to be blessed.’- Wisd. ii. 15, 16.”

St. Agobard, attributed: “Jєωs are cursed and covered with malediction. The curse has penetrated them like water in their bowels and oil in their bones. They are cursed in the city and cursed in the country, cursed in their coming in and cursed in their going out. Cursed are the fruits of their loins, of their lands, of their flocks; cursed are their cellars, their granaries, their shops, their food, the very crumbs off their tables!”

St. John Capistrano: “Christ is King, and Christ’s Church is the kingdom of God. The Jєωs are the descendants of those who killed this king. They have inherited hatred against Christ from their ancestors, and they give it full vent wherever they can do so with impunity. Therefore, we are justified in suspecting them. They are now simply our enemies and are known as such. They have crucified our Lord Jesus Christ.’

Popes

The Holy See and the Jєωs, published by the Ligue Franc-Catholique (the League of the French Catholic) at 11 bis, rue Portalis, Paris, France. The League is a lay group of Catholics for patriotic and social defense, founded by Monseigneur Jouin, Apostolic Prothonotary, Cure of St. Augustine parish, Paris in 1913. The magazine was founded March 23, 1918, with the approval of the Holy See. Monseigneur Jouin was a recognized authority on Jєωιѕн history and objectives and the necessity for exposing the facts in defense of Christianity. The Vatican formally praised him for this work of enlightenment as far back as June 20, 1919, in a letter signed by Cardinal Gasparri, Papal Secretary of State. Monseigneur Jouin died in 1932.
http://web.archive.org/web/20020819175303/http://www.endofman.com/False_Religion/holysee.htm

Pope Gregory IX, “Epistle to the Hierarchy of Germany,” in 1233 A.D., Annales Ecclesiastici, Cardinal Caesar Baronius, ed. August Theiner, 1864, vol.I: “Ungrateful for favors and forgetful of benefits, the Jєωs return insult for kindness and impious contempt for goodness. They ought to know the yoke of perpetual enslavement because of their guilt. See to it that the perfidious Jєωs never in the future grow insolent, but that they always suffer publicly the shame of their sin in servile fear.”

Pope St. Leo the Great, Sermon CLXVIII; BVM vol.II, p.119: “So clearly was the transition then made from the ѕуηαgσgυє to the Church that, when the Lord gave up His soul, the veil of the Temple was rent in two.”

Pope Innocent IV, Letter to King Louis IX of France, May 9, 1244: “The ... Jєωs ... omitting or scorning the Mosaic law and the prophets, follow certain traditions of their seniors concerning which the Lord rebukes them in the Gospel, saying: ‘Why do you transgress the mandate of God and irritate Him by your traditions, teaching human doctrines and mandates?’ [Matthew 15;9] Upon this sort of traditions, which in Hebrew are called the тαℓмυd--and there is a great book among them exceeding the text of the Bible in length, in which are manifest blasphemies against God and Christ and the blessed Virgin, intricate fables, erroneous abuses, and unheard-of stupidities--they nourish and teach their sons and render them utterly alien from the doctrine of the law and the prophets ...”

Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, para. 29: “…the New Testament took the place of the Old Law which had been abolished…but on the gibbet of His death Jesus made void the Law with its decrees fastened the handwriting of the Old Testament to the Cross.”

Pope Innocent III, “Epistle to the Hierarchy of France,” July 15, 1205, PL 215: “Crucifiers of Christ ought to be held in continual subjection.”

Pope St. Pius V, Hebraeorum gens: “The Jєωιѕн people fell from the heights because of their faithlessness and condemned their Redeemer to a shameful death. Their godlessness has assumed such forms that, for the salvation of our own people, it becomes necessary to prevent their disease. Besides usury, through which Jєωs everywhere have sucked dry the property of impoverished Christians, they are accomplices of thieves and robbers; and the most damaging aspect of the matter is that they allure the unsuspecting through magical incantations, superstition, and witchcraft to the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan and boast of being able to predict the future. We have carefully investigated how this revolting sect abuses the name of Christ and how harmful they are to those whose life is threatened by their deceit. On account of these and other serious matters, and because of the gravity of their crimes which increase day to day more and more, We order that, within 90 days, all Jєωs in our entire earthly realm of justice -- in all towns, districts, and places -- must depart these regions.”

Pope Pius VII: “For when the liberty of all ‘religions’ is indiscriminately asserted, by this very fact truth is confounded with error and the holy and immaculate Spouse of Christ, the Church, outside of which there can be no salvation, is set on a par with the sects of heretics and with Judaic perfidy itself.”

Pope Paul IV, cuм Nimis Absurdum: “Desiring firstly, as much as we can with [the help of] God, to beneficially provide, by this [our decree] that will forever be in force, we ordain that for the rest of time, in the City as well as in other states, territories and domains of the Church of Rome itself, all Jєωs are to live in only one [quarter] to which there is only one entrance and from which there is but one exit, and if there is not that capacity [in one such quarter, then], in two or three or however many may be enough; [in any case] they should reside entirely side by side in designated streets and be thoroughly separate from the residences of Christians... Moreover, concerning the matter that Jєωs should be recognizable everywhere: [to this end] men must wear a hat, women, indeed, some other evident sign, yellow in color... Moreover, these Jєωs are to be limited to the trade of rag-picking, and they cannot trade in grain, barley or any other commodity essential to human welfare.”

Pope Leo VII, REG. PONTIF., vol.I:3597, Jaffe, Leipzig: 1888: “Let the Gospel be preached to them and, if they remain obstinate, let them be expelled.”

Mark 79 · « **Reply #9 on:** October 06, 2019, 12:29:31 AM »

alaric · « **Reply #10 on:** October 06, 2019, 10:32:53 AM »

Quote from: poche on October 03, 2019, 01:55:08 AM

From Pope Pius XI;

8. Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community - however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things - whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds.

http://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/docuмents/hf_p-xi_enc_14031937_mit-brennender-sorge.html

Ironically, he prophetically fully described the state of Israel in which he enabled in his chastisement of the German leadership in their racial policies concerning the meddling Jєωs who were attempting to sack Germany at the time.
If only Pius was just as concerned for Christians in communist Russia and his own Catholics in masonic Mexico who were being slaughtered by the thousands at this very same time could he have used his position of power and influence to turn the tables against such anti-christian forces such as ʝʊdɛօ-marxism and ʝʊdɛօ-Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in those respective nations.
But no, as always, it's always about the Jєωs, even by catholic popes and even at the expense of their own flock.
Some things never change.

Mark 79 · « **Reply #11 on:** October 06, 2019, 10:53:46 AM »

Quote from: alaric on October 06, 2019, 10:32:53 AM

Ironically, he prophetically fully described the state of Israel in which he enabled in his chastisement of the German leadership in their racial policies concerning the meddling Jєωs who were attempting to sack Germany at the time.
If only Pius was just as concerned for Christians in communist Russia and his own Catholics in masonic Mexico who were being slaughtered by the thousands at this very same time could he have used his position of power and influence to turn the tables against such anti-christian forces such as ʝʊdɛօ-marxism and ʝʊdɛօ-Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in those respective nations.
But no, as always, it's always about the Jєωs, even by catholic popes and even at the expense of their own flock.
Some things never change.

Exactly so.

"Only Jєωs are human" and "Kill even the best of the Gentiles" are the most fundamental precepts of Judaism.

Yet pooch/douche feigns that friendship is possible with the worst genocidal Master Race maniacs the world has ever seen anywhere.

Only Jєωs are human

“You are called men, but non-Jєωs are not called men.”

Bava Metzia 114b

Note Rabbi Shimon ben Yohai’s ruling: “…only ‘you,’ the members of the Jєωιѕн people, are called men, but non-Jєωs are not called men.”

“Kill even the best of Gentiles… in a time when the Jєωs have control over the Gentiles.”

Incredulous · « **Reply #12 on:** October 09, 2019, 06:41:46 AM »

Poche is a Jєω

Well, it seems to make sense now.

“Charity to the Jєωs”, the enemies of Jesus Christ and our Holy religion is a propaganda “schtik” the Jєωs have gotten a lot of free mileage on.

But that bus is running out of gas, as the mask of ʝʊdɛօ-masonry is being torn off.

Meg · « **Reply #13 on:** October 09, 2019, 07:13:14 AM »

Quote from: poche on October 06, 2019, 12:24:32 AM

What you are suggesting is a contradiction to Pope St Pius X.

I have always been on good terms with Jєωs. Only the other evening two Jєωs were here to see me. After all, there are other bonds than those of religion: courtesy and philanthropy. These we do not deny to the Jєωs. Indeed, we also pray for them: that their minds be enlightened.

https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904

Yes, Pope Pius X did say that courtesy, philanthropy and prayers should be given to Jєωs. However, he also denied his support for the state of Israel.

Our Lord said that we are to love our enemies and pray for them. A few of those on this forum who point out the wrongdoings of the Jєωs very likely do not love and pray for them. If they did, they would temper their criticisms somewhat.

But even so, we should also be aware of the wrong-doings of Jєωs against the Church and society in general. Certainly not all Jєωs work directly for the overthrow of the Church. But of those who do, they have been very successful in their efforts. And unfortunately, there are MANY non-Jєωs who help in the efforts to de-Christianize our society. Take, for instance, just one American institution that is controlled by Jєωs: Hollywood. The filth and smut that Hollywood produces is disgusting. And they rarely allow any real and true Catholic principles to be in any film. Remember how they cruelly persecuted Mel Gibson because he made "Passion of the Christ." I wrote to the head of the ADL at that time to complain about their treatment of Gibson, but I did not hear back from them.

I recall once asking a Jєωιѕн forum member on the Catholic Answers forum several years ago why it is that Jєωs tend to want to control everything. He was quite honest about it: he said that Jєωs feel that God has given them the right to do whatever it takes to survive. That makes sense. I get the impression that they work hard to overthrow the Church (and dominate the world) so that their race can survive. I think that it's fear-based. Their minds are clouded by evil. The only thing that can really stop it is prayer.

Mark 79 · « **Reply #14 on:** October 09, 2019, 10:55:52 AM »

Ahhhh, Poche has made a proselyte to his Gospel of Lukewarmness.

As if we should ignore Jesus Christ so we can make ourselves lukewarm on the matter of His most organized earth;y opposition?

As if we should ignore the Councils, Popes, Doctors, and Saints who unanimously insist we must vocally and vigorously oppose the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan?

As if we should be timid, if we criticize at all, their Jєωιѕн supremacism, instigating gentile-against-gentile wars, fomenting revolutions, suborning heresies, undermining Christian society, fαℓѕє fℓαgs, big lies, inflicting multiculturalism, and perpetrating vice, ritual murder, genocide, slavery and economic crimes against humanity, including usury, fractional reserve banking, swindling, and tax farming?

Rubbish. We will never pull back the pendulum of Jєωιѕн power with smarmy timidity.

Author Topic: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism (Read 1470 times)

Mark 79

The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

Syracuse

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

poche

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

Mark 79

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

Incredulous

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

Merry

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

Mark 79

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

poche

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

Mark 79

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

Mark 79

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

alaric

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

Mark 79

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

Incredulous

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

Meg

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism

Mark 79

Re: The Necessity of Anti-Semitism