Thank you, Cassini.  

E rev around S

Yeh, nor does he ever mention a flat earth and even refers to the Earth as a planet! What is it with you guys? You disregard everything positive from a Catholic point of view and look for something that you can use to try to discredit a person or what he or she writes. If you lived in England or Europe like Moorhouse you too would have far more to fear from them than the Jєωs you seem to hate. If you are so worried about the Jєωs well go write up your own hate magazine about them.

You don't think promotion of Jєωιѕн fables betrays a serious deficit in a Catholic thinking? How is a Catholic magazine a worthy aid to our lives when it colludes with God's most organized earthly opposition?

As for your challenge… from the Home page of http://judaism.is :


You, AIPAC, the ADL, and SPLC might call that "hate," but I do not. That said http://judaism.is is certainly "about them" as you challenged.

No doubt, Fr. Denis Fahey if he were still among the Church Militant would not be found acceptable by The Flock, but he would surely find a welcome home as a contributor to http://judaism.ishttp://judaism.is

cf. https://catholicism.org/fahey-anti-semitism.htmlhttps://catholicism.org/fahey-anti-semitism.html

Father Denis Fahey on Anti-Semitism

(Books by or about Father Denis Fahey are available at store.catholicism.org)
On account of the confusion of mind prevalent among Catholics concerning the question of Anti-Semitism, a few words must be said about it.
In the excellent review of my book The Kingship of Christ or Organized Naturalism which appeared in the Jesuit magazine, La Civilta Cattolica (Rome, March, 1947), the reviewer laid special stress on the distinction which I have been making in all my books. He wrote as follows:

Space does not allow of lengthy quotations from papal docuмents to show that, on the one hand, the sovereign pontiffs insist that Catholics must stand unflinchingly for the integral rights of Christ the King as contained in the papal encyclicals, while, on the other hand, keeping their minds and hearts free from hatred of Our Lord’s own nation according to the flesh. On the one hand, they must battle for the rights of Christ the King and the supernatural organization of society a laid down in the encyclical Quas Primas , unequivocally proclaiming that the rejection of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the True Messias, by His own nation, and the unyielding opposition of that nation to Him, are a fundamental source of disorder and conflict in the world. On the other hand, as members of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Catholics should neither hate the members of that nation in which, through our Blessed Mother, the Lily of Israel, the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity assumed human nature, nor deny them their legitimate rights as persons.

The supernatural elevation of mind and heart and the unshrinking fortitude that are required from members of Christ in our day can be maintained only with the aid of Him who wept over Jerusalem’s rejection of order. It will inevitably mean suffering for Christ’s faithful members as the power of the anti-supernatural forces in the world increases. Even in the midst of their suffering, however, Christ’s members must bear in mind that there will be a glorious triumph for Christ the King.

Two reasons can be assigned for the fact that Our Lord’s faithful members will often be betrayed by those who should be on the side of Christ the King. Firstly, many Catholic writers speak of papal condemnations of Anti-Semitism without explaining the meaning of the term and never even allude to the docuмents which insist on the rights of Our Divine Lord, Head of the Mystical Body, Priest and King. Thus, very many are completely ignorant of the duty incuмbent on all Catholics of standing positively for Our Lord’s reign in society in opposition to Jєωιѕн naturalism.

The result is that numbers of Catholics are so ignorant of Catholic doctrine that they hurl the accusation of Anti-Semitism against those who are battling for the rights of Christ the King thus effectively aiding the enemies of Our Divine Lord. Secondly, many Catholic writers copy unquestioningly what they read in the naturalistic or anti-supernatural Press and do not distinguish between Anti-Semitism in the correct Catholic sense, as explained above, and “Anti- Semitism,” as the Jєωs understand it. For the Jєωs, “Anti-Semitism” is anything that is in opposition to the naturalistic Messianic domination of their nation over all the others. Quite logically, the leaders of the Jєωιѕн nation hold that to stand for the Rights of Christ the King is to be “Anti-Semitic.”

The term “Anti-Semitism,” with all its war-connotation in the minds of the unthinking, is being extended to include any form of opposition to the Jєωιѕн nation’s naturalistic aims and any exposure of the methods they adopt to achieve these aims.

At the beatification of Joan of Arc the saintly Pope Pius X said:
“In our time more than ever before, the greatest asset of those disposed toward evil is the cowardice and weakness of good men, and all the vigor of Satan’s reign is due to the easygoing weakness of Catholics. Oh! if I might ask the Divine Redeemer, as the Prophet Zachary did in spirit (Zach. 13:6a): ‘What are those wounds in the midst of Thy hands?’ The answer would not be doubtful: ‘…With these I was wounded in the house of them that loved me’ (Zach. 13:6b). I was wounded by my friends, who did nothing to defend me, and who, on every occasion, made themselves the accomplices of my adversaries. And this reproach can be leveled at the weak and timid Catholics of all countries.”

What is wrong with these statements: "At least 'Christian' Zionists are trying to take action" or "At least the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan is trying to take action"?

Is this more to your liking lads.


"Trump offered to buy Greenland from Denmark and the Danish responded with an offer to buy the United States from Israel."

Is there a reference for this quote?