Author Topic: Thank you  (Read 653 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline josefamenendez

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1140
  • Reputation: +733/-54
  • Gender: Female
Thank you
« on: January 13, 2020, 07:41:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Dear Matthew,
    Thank you for letting me post so liberally over the past 3 years. I appreciated the Cathinfo forum very much. Now considering recent events, I realize it's time to move on. There always seems a point of compromise that I find difficult... certainly not questioning your authority but every action has a reaction. Pretty much the same thing illicited a similar reaction from me at "Angel Queen" back in the day. It is what it is.

    God bless you and Mater Dominici
    josefamenendez

    PS- I'll be voting pro-life for Trump, no doubt-lol

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5874
    • Reputation: +4718/-1762
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thank you
    « Reply #1 on: January 13, 2020, 07:54:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • What’s this all about?

    Obviously, I missed something here.
    Romans 5:20 "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    -I retract any and all statements I have made that are incongruent with the True Faith, and apologize for ever having made them-


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 20744
    • Reputation: +11440/-5598
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thank you
    « Reply #2 on: January 13, 2020, 08:09:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • What’s this all about?

    Obviously, I missed something here.

    Perhaps it has something to do with the banning of those two users last night?  I wouldn't think so, though, since she's never really been aligned with those two.

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5874
    • Reputation: +4718/-1762
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thank you
    « Reply #3 on: January 13, 2020, 08:22:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Perhaps it has something to do with the banning of those two users last night?  I wouldn't think so, though, since she's never really been aligned with those two.
    That was my first thought, but she’s pro-Trump, so she couldn’t have shared the views of Mark79/Klas and been upset by their banning.
    And Matthew allows free reign to sedes here, with whom she identifies.
    So is she just mad that CI isn’t even MORE liberal in the free-for-all (ie., nobody should get banned, ever)?
    Ps: I’m not saying they should have been banned (for the record, I agree with them about Trump), just disagreeing with the idea nobody should ever be banned.
    It would be nice if she would come back for one last clarifying post of what her specific grievances were.
    Romans 5:20 "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    -I retract any and all statements I have made that are incongruent with the True Faith, and apologize for ever having made them-

    Offline ByzCat3000

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1089
    • Reputation: +240/-82
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thank you
    « Reply #4 on: January 13, 2020, 08:25:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Wait, people were banned over Trump?

    Why?

    Like I would've thought practical politics would be something even traditional Catholics could disagree on, or is there something I'm missing.

    EDIT: Nevermind I saw the post.


    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2940
    • Reputation: +1080/-2135
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thank you
    « Reply #5 on: January 13, 2020, 02:54:14 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!5
  • Because Mark and Klas kept attacking and harassing people.

    With Mark, he seemed to regress rather quickly after being told NOT to harass Poche.

    I don't like Poche as a user, but it got to be a bit too much. If he wants to ban Poche, then he can start his own forum.
    Remember O most gracious Virgin Mary...

    Offline MaterDominici

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 5043
    • Reputation: +3741/-72
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Thank you
    « Reply #6 on: January 13, 2020, 03:12:45 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • It would be nice if she would come back for one last clarifying post of what her specific grievances were.
    No thanks.
    I think we need MORE individuals who can just acknowledge that this group of people isn't a good fit for them and move on without causing a scene.
    If a CathInfo member can't get along with Matthew -- the real person, for better or worse -- they either have to avoid him or just admit that this corner of the internet isn't for them and move on.

    (edited for clarity)
    "I think that Catholicism, that's as sane as people can get."  - Jordan Peterson

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5098
    • Reputation: +2431/-1396
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Thank you
    « Reply #7 on: January 13, 2020, 04:16:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Perhaps it has something to do with the banning of those two users last night?  I wouldn't think so, though, since she's never really been aligned with those two.
    It sure looks like it has something to do with their banning despite the fact that she did not appear to align herself with them/their positions.
    "For there is not any thing secret that shall not be made manifest, nor hidden, that shall not be known and come abroad."- Luke 8:17


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 20744
    • Reputation: +11440/-5598
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thank you
    « Reply #8 on: January 13, 2020, 05:32:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • No thanks.
    I think we need MORE individuals who can just acknowledge that this group of people isn't a good fit for them and move on without causing a scene.
    If a CathInfo member can't get along with Matthew -- the real person, for better or worse -- they either have to avoid him or just admit that this corner of the internet isn't for them and move on.

    (edited for clarity)

    Well, someone could get along with Matthew himself just fine but find themselves unable to tolerate certain other members here.

    Offline MaterDominici

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 5043
    • Reputation: +3741/-72
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Thank you
    « Reply #9 on: January 13, 2020, 06:38:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well, someone could get along with Matthew himself just fine but find themselves unable to tolerate certain other members here.
    True. Matthew was just the first example.
    .
    Related to this ... Did you see my post about the hide feature? I think it might have been in a now-deleted thread. The feature works as well as expected for me. I don't know if it's turned on for everyone or not.
    "I think that Catholicism, that's as sane as people can get."  - Jordan Peterson

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 20744
    • Reputation: +11440/-5598
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thank you
    « Reply #10 on: January 13, 2020, 07:28:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • True. Matthew was just the first example.
    .
    Related to this ... Did you see my post about the hide feature? I think it might have been in a now-deleted thread. The feature works as well as expected for me. I don't know if it's turned on for everyone or not.

    Yes, I did.  Thank you.


    Offline ByzCat3000

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1089
    • Reputation: +240/-82
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Thank you
    « Reply #11 on: January 13, 2020, 09:31:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That was my first thought, but she’s pro-Trump, so she couldn’t have shared the views of Mark79/Klas and been upset by their banning.
    And Matthew allows free reign to sedes here, with whom she identifies.
    So is she just mad that CI isn’t even MORE liberal in the free-for-all (ie., nobody should get banned, ever)?
    Ps: I’m not saying they should have been banned (for the record, I agree with them about Trump), just disagreeing with the idea nobody should ever be banned.
    It would be nice if she would come back for one last clarifying post of what her specific grievances were.
    Someone could theoretically be pro Trump but still be strongly for allowing free speech on the topic.

    BTW I will say, while forums are obviously a different story, from a political/national standpoint I believe in the freedom of political speech, though not the freedom to speak against the Church or the Family.  Now maybe I'm wrong about that, but I'm just preempting the inevitable "Free speech isn't a Catholic view." I mean again I agree when it comes to attacking the faith or the family.

    Offline Nadir

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6783
    • Reputation: +3617/-255
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Thank you
    « Reply #12 on: January 14, 2020, 04:57:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Dear Matthew,
    Thank you for letting me post so liberally over the past 3 years. I appreciated the Cathinfo forum very much. Now considering recent events, I realize it's time to move on. There always seems a point of compromise that I find difficult... certainly not questioning your authority but every action has a reaction. Pretty much the same thing illicited a similar reaction from me at "Angel Queen" back in the day. It is what it is.

    God bless you and Mater Dominici
    josefamenendez

    PS- I'll be voting pro-life for Trump, no doubt-lol
    I will miss your postings, josefa. You have made great contributions. I hope that you might reconsider some time in the future.


     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16