Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Stephen Hawking - famous Big Bang physicist and atheist - meets his Maker  (Read 1389 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31183
  • Reputation: +27098/-494
  • Gender: Male
He knows there's a God now!

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43396008
Want to say "thank you"? 
You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


Offline JezusDeKoning

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2940
  • Reputation: +1090/-2220
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Very interesting that he lived for this long with ALS. Most people get a decade and even that is generous. It's a debilitating disease.
    Remember O most gracious Virgin Mary...


    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • From wormholes to "the worm [that dieth] not"? Mark 9:48

    Lust darkens the intellect.  In old age he would frequent sex clubs!

    Satan also had a great intellect (much, much greater than that of Hawking) and yet his lust for power and domination blinded him in a major way!

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Very interesting that he lived for this long with ALS. Most people get a decade and even that is generous. It's a debilitating disease.
    .
    Yeah, it's amazing, and usually we would say, It's a miracle! But Hawking didn't believe in miracles.
    .
    Now THAT'S interesting.
    .
    If only they can claim Hawking had prayed to Pope Paul VI, it could help for his Newcanonization, but Hawking didn't pray. Darn.
    .
    He did have a saint's name, St. Stephen (the protomartyr). But I digress.
    .
    I heard a very interesting comment on the radio. It was from a man who has "dabbled in the paranormal" all his life. For example, he re-read the Bible with an open mind to discover that the snake in the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was not Satan at all, but that had been what the Church Fathers later on came up with to explain it, and so on. He had a litany of falsehoods that went on and on and on.
    .
    In regards to Hawking and his amazing run with ALS for 50 years when most people don't live for more than 10 with that debilitating disease, how at the end there was only one muscle in his cheek that he could move and that's how he communicated to his machine that transformed his code muscle pulses into an artificial voice and so on. This dabbler in the paranormal who doesn't believe in God, assured us that Stephen Hawking didn't believe in God, either.
    .
    AND THEN this dabbler in the paranormal who doesn't believe in God had this to say:  He said he takes comfort in thinking that when Hawking crossed over to the great beyond, that he would find himself whole and without the imprisoning confines of ALS that he had suffered with most of his life, and he would say, "Thank God."
    .
    That was really interesting.
    .
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • From wormholes to "the worm [that dieth] not"? Mark 9:48

    Lust darkens the intellect.  In old age he would frequent sex clubs!

    Satan also had a great intellect (much, much greater than that of Hawking) and yet his lust for power and domination blinded him in a major way!
    .
    For those with eyes to see and ears to hear, the life of Stephen Hawking is the image of the imprisonment of eternal damnation.
    .
    The debilitating imprisonment of ALS is NOTHING compared to the heavy chains and tormenting dark isolation that is hell.
    .
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline ClarkSmith

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 498
    • Reputation: +255/-8
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • He believed his brain was a computer that was just powering off.  The brain-computer comparison is kinda like the big bang theory in a way. We woke up one day and computers were just there.  Those computers weren't designed by anyone. Nope.  

    Offline cassini

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3298
    • Reputation: +2082/-236
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is a little 'SCIENCE' info on Hawking a 'THEORETICAL PHYSICIST.'

    Carl Sagan, a self professed agnostic, in the preface to Stephen Hawking’s book ‘A Brief History of Time’ has this to say:
     
    ‘This is also a book about God… or perhaps the absence of God. The word God fills these pages. Hawking embarks on a quest to answer Einstein’s famous question about whether God had any choice in creating the universe. Hawking is attempting, as he states, to understand the mind of God.’[1]    
     
    There is however, something more all should know about Stephen Hawking:
     
    ‘Hawking and the mind of God? He does not believe in anything resembling the Christian God… his theory of everything has no place at all for a Creator…. By his playing the God card, Hawking has cleverly fanned the flames of his own publicity appeal directly to the popular allure of scientist as [neo-Pythagorean] priest.’[2]


    [1]Stephen Hawking: Brief History of Time, Bantam Press, 1988.
    [2]Peter Coles: Hawking, Postmodern Encounters, Icon Books, 2000, p.47.

    To demonstrate the kind of hold the Copernican cosmology has on the ‘educated’ mind these days, we again refer to Hawking’s first book, the one released on ‘April fools’ day’ in 1988, the one millions have bought to date.  
     
    ‘We may have no idea what Professor Hawking does – but everyone knows it is damned clever stuff. So dauntingly clever that I suspect a hefty percentage of the 25 million copies of his book A Brief History of Time, still remain unopened since it came out. But the sales prove we are, in theory anyway, hungry to learn about his heroic search for the so-called Theory of Everything that will explain once and for all the universe and its purpose.’[1]
     
    The paragraph above, found in a newspaper review of the play ‘God and Stephen Hawking,’ illustrates the heliocentric magic to perfection. As with Satan’s inducement to Adam that he could know all things like God, Hawking, a professed atheist, invited on to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences in Rome in 1986 by the way, is now promoted as the guru to follow. With no idea what he ‘does’ and without understanding what he writes, Hawking, Einstein and their ilk are held in awe by the media, the public, even popes in Rome for their ‘science.’ Theoretical cosmology is now classed as ‘damned clever stuff’ that cannot be understood, which as a means of ‘faith’ indoctrination is ‘foolproof.’  
         The question that could be asked here is how could so many ‘scholars’ get away without the need to justify such assertions that cannot be known? Well, the fact is that they don’t have to prove or vindicate anything for most in Church and State these days, for they are no longer dealing with thinking man, Homo sapiens, who should require some validation before considering such opinions to be of real worth in our understanding of knowledge. No, such people write for that ‘new species’ Homo consensus, programmed man, those instructed from children’s primary school to follow the ideological tantra that now reigns supreme. For centuries now, man has been imbued, infused as if by magic with a whole new creed, a materialist evolutionary cosmology, using the intellectual elite, the ‘experts,’ the scholars, and even popes now, who tell us that ‘science’ tells us this and ‘science’ tells us that, and even to challenge these assertions would be to proclaim one’s ignorance. The truth of course is another thing, and an honest summation of this scientific illusion is rare to find. 
     
    ‘Every so often, you have to unlearn what you thought you knew, and replace it by something more subtle. This process is what science is all about, and it never stops. It means that you shouldn’t take everything we say as gospel, either, for we belong to another equally honourable profession; liar-to-readers.’[2]


    [1]R. Gore-Langton: Daily Express, Friday 1st Sept 2000.
    [2]Terry Pratchett, Ian Stewart and Jack Cohen: The Science of Discworld, Ebury Press, Random House, 1999, p.39.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • .
    Carl Sagan, a self-professed agnostic, in the preface to Stephen Hawking’s book ‘A Brief History of Time’ has this to say:
     
    ‘This is also a book about God… or perhaps the absence of God. The word God fills these pages. Hawking embarks on a quest to answer Einstein’s famous question about whether God had any choice in creating the universe. Hawking is attempting, as he states, to understand the mind of God.’[1]    


    [1]Stephen Hawking: Brief History of Time, Bantam Press, 1988.
    [2]Peter Coles: Hawking, Postmodern Encounters, Icon Books, 2000, p.47.
    .
    Note the dichotomy: Hawking, who does not believe God exists, attempts to understand God's mind. IOW Hawking seeks to know that which he believes (since it does not exist) is not knowable.
    .
    He was just careful not to say that God's mind isn't knowable because it doesn't exist because the Church has already condemned the error that God is not knowable. That ought to raise a few suspicions among Catholics. Even under BoR Francis.
    .
    Quote
    To demonstrate the kind of hold the Copernican cosmology has on the ‘educated’ mind these days, we again refer to Hawking’s first book, the one released on ‘April fools’ day’ in 1988, the one millions have bought to date.  

    ‘We may have no idea what Professor Hawking does – but everyone knows it is damned clever stuff. So dauntingly clever that I suspect a hefty percentage of the 25 million copies of his book A Brief History of Timestill remain unopened since it came out. But the sales prove we are, in theory anyway, hungry to learn about his heroic search for the so-called Theory of Everything that will explain once and for all the universe and its purpose.’[1]
    .
    Don't you think if they were really "hungry to learn" they would take a peek at what's in the book?
    So what was so "heroic" about his "search?"
    .
    This ludicrous trend began mid-20th century, when secular luminaries like Percy Bridgman (Nobel Prize, 1946, High Pressure Physics) were admired for their pronouncements on the morality of the use nuclear weapons. Trouble was, they didn't have anything beneficial to say about it. Wisdom is a gift from God, and He doesn't give it to those who do not believe He exists.
    .
    An outspoken and honest commentator on Hawking's death admitted that everyone he knew who ran out and purchased a copy of Brief History of Time never opened it, but set it prominently on his bookshelf where everyone would see that he's "in the know."
    .
    Reminds me of the writings of JPII. Nobody who actually reads them is any better off! Notice how few quotes there are of the contents of any of these things from Hawking or JPII. I have a copy of Ratzinger's Theological Highlights of Vatican II, which contains absolutely nothing worth remembering. Somehow I've managed to read it twice.
    .
    Quote
    He does not believe in anything resembling the Christian God…
    .
    Looks like Hawking had a lot in common with Bishop-of-Rome Francis.
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline cassini

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3298
    • Reputation: +2082/-236
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Neil, I once tried to read JP2's encyclical on FAITH AND REASON. Where these guys get all those long words and expressions I do not know. Anyway, it all ended up with praising Galileo. That told me what the encyclical was worth to Catholics, --- anti-faith.

    Offline Nadir

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11666
    • Reputation: +6994/-498
    • Gender: Female
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Very interesting that he lived for this long with ALS. Most people get a decade and even that is generous. It's a debilitating disease.
    I haven't read this yet:
    Repost: Stephen Hawking Died and has been Replaced
    Help of Christians, guard our land from assault or inward stain,
    Let it be what God has planned, His new Eden where You reign.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Neil, I once tried to read JP2's encyclical on FAITH AND REASON. Where these guys get all those long words and expressions I do not know. Anyway, it all ended up with praising Galileo. That told me what the encyclical was worth to Catholics, --- anti-faith.
    .
    It seems to me JPII thought of Galileo as one of many of the Church's longstanding so-called enemies with whom he believed it was his place to make amends. 
    .
    He tried to rehabilitate Galileo as he made inroads with Protestants (reception of Communion, peace with Martin Luther), while he kissed a Koran and got Hindu cow dung smeared on his forehead. Benedict XVI took sort of a break from such aggressiveness but he did hold another Assisi abomination and got caught hanging out with overeating Mohammedans (so-called fasting during Ramadan, which means eating like pigs).  His hermeneutic of continuity tried to go where theology had never gone before (he must have watched too much Star Trek). Then along comes Francis who takes it to a new level.
    .
    A local Pauline Books and media shop (supposed to be Catholic, Paulist congregation) is chock-full of NewAge psychobabble literature. I asked them if they have encyclicals and motu proprios, so they showed me their available list in a catalog. I asked, "What about ones disseminated before 1962?" They replied, "Oh, well, it looks like we only carry the ones published after The Council." 
    .
    I looked into it further, to find that in SPANISH, they carried a select few of the older ones, the docuмents relevant to Hispanics in particular. But not a hint of the Syllabus of Errors, Quas Primas, Pascendi Dominici Gregis, Sacrorum Antistitum, Quanta Cura or any like that before Vat.II -- which they always refer to as THE Council (implying that this was the only council, or it was the only one that counts).
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline Miseremini

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3753
    • Reputation: +2794/-238
    • Gender: Female
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • God's mercy and patience must be truly limitless  for Him to give Stephen so many
    years to turn to the truth.
    "Let God arise, and let His enemies be scattered: and them that hate Him flee from before His Holy Face"  Psalm 67:2[/b]


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I haven't read this yet:
    Repost: Stephen Hawking Died and has been Replaced
    .
    In such pieces, it sometimes helps to skip to the end to see if it's worth reading the rest:
    .
    http://milesmathis.com/hawk3.pdf
    .
    Anyway, so that is who funded the Hawking impostor after 1985. But why? Well, we have seen all sorts of weirdness afoot in physics and other science since then. I haven't made up this weirdness, you know, I just circle it and comment on it. See my paper on Hawking's Brave New World, if you haven't already. See my paper on Yuri Milner and the Fundamental Physics Prize. See my paper on the Higgs Boson announcement, which I show was faked from the ground up. See my paper on Alan Guth and the faked gravity wave research and promotion which preceded his 2014 Kavli Prize. Well, the reason for all this weirdness is the reason for all the other weirdnesses in the Modern world: money. Physics has become a giant cash cow, milked straight from the various national treasuries by the usual suspects. Hundreds of billions of dollars are siphoned from the people of Europe, China, Russia, and the Americas via these fake programs. And Hawking was an important PR personality in the early 1980's, one they didn't want to lose. He was a top salesman of their various boondoggles, and he became an even better salesman once he was replaced by an impostor. Once he was replaced, his puppeteers had complete control over the product they were creating, with no fear that the real Hawking might develop scruples.
    .
    Remember, this is exactly what they did in art in the 20th century. They got rid of all the real artists and replaced them with impostors. The scheme was slightly different, in that they didn't replace Rodin and Monet and Whistler with look-alikes in 1900. Instead, they just replaced the entire field with their own manufactured mannequins over a generation or two. But the Modern artists have been impostors one way or the other. They certainly aren't artists by the old definitions, since they can't create anything beautiful or interesting. They are just PR personalities, the faces that front the fakery.
    .
    In the very same way, physics has been taken over. Just as the Modern artists are incapable of real art, the Modern physicists are incapable of real physics. So instead they manufacture some huge pile of equations that seems (to some gullible people) to resemble physics or math, and then sell it to Congress or Parliament as cutting-edge. The important thing is not that any physics or art gets done, but that money flows from the treasury. It is all a colossal scam, of earth-shattering proportions. And I mean that literally. All the societies of this Earth are being shattered by this rampant fakery. They are coming apart at the seams. Not only are they being milked dry of all revenues—revenues that could and should be going to real programs—but they are being milked dry of all inspiration, all creativity, all good will, and all belief in humanity. Human potential is shriveling up like a spider on a hot sidewalk under a magnifying glass, and these rich families are the magnifying glass.
    .
    It has to stop. It has gotten so bad, the rich are actually undercutting themselves. For money to be worth anything there has to be something worth buying. The rich can no longer collect art, since they have destroyed it. They can no longer have the joy of underwriting real science, since they have destroyed it. They can't collect books or poetry, since they have destroyed both literature and poetry. They can't enjoy the company of innocent youths, since they have destroyed the innocence of youth. They can't enjoy love, because they have destroyed it for profit. They can't enjoy beautiful architecture, because they have destroyed it. And they can't enjoy the feeling of a day well spent, because their days aren't well spent. That is the thing about dirty money and a dirty conscience: no matter how much you spend, you can't hire someone to clean it.
    .
    [I am rushing this into print with only a few days research, since I predict they will announce his death very very soon.]
    .
    Addendum, April 22, 2015: Two days after this paper went up, there was an internet death hoax for Hawking. Someone got over a million hits at Facebook with this hoax. I read that two ways: 1) the widely publicized hoax acts to cover this paper a bit, because some will dismiss my title without reading the paper, thinking it is linked to the hoax. For this reason, I assume the death hoax was started by the same people that are behind the long term Hawking hoax. 2) We have seen that these internet death hoaxes often now precede a real death announcement. See the strange goings-on before the announcement of Robin Williams' death (which I assume was faked like the rest). This confusion is created on purpose, because it prevents most people from making any sense of the news. Confusing news prevents questions—perhaps surprisingly—because it causes most people's brains to shut down. You would think confusing news would create questions, and in a few people it still does. But in the majority of people, very confusing news acts as its own shield. If enough confusion is created, the reader or viewer will just see a tangled web he has no hope of unwinding, causing him to accept whatever he is told and “move on.” For this reason, I will double down on my prediction that the real death announcement of Hawking is coming soon. However, we know they are reading my papers, so they may stall just for the purpose of nixing my prediction. At any rate, my intuition tells me the blonde impostor died recently and they are already stalling. Maybe they are looking for another replacement, who knows. I think it will be hard to find someone who looked like the blonde impostor did at the end.
    .
    Addendum, April 25 2015: We already have new evidence for my claim that the Hawking impostor is also dead, in that his current appearances are via hologram. Last night he appeared in Sydney via hologram, but these 3D images cannot be confirmed to be live. Like any other images, holograms can be taped and played back later. I will be told he responds to live questions, but that can be explained in any number of ways, included [including] planted questions. But even if we assume or prove the questions are live and not planted, [all] the responses of Hawking all have to be interpreted, which allows for any amount of trickery. From visual and aural clues alone, there is no way to tell what Hawking is responding to, which you will have to admit is convenient.
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31183
    • Reputation: +27098/-494
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Stephen Hawking we've been seeing the past several years is not Stephen Hawking at all, but a double!

    See the compelling photographic evidence in the PDF below...
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • God's mercy and patience must be truly limitless for Him to give Stephen so many
    years to turn to the truth.
    .
    That's a nice thought, Miseremini, because you're a nice person. 
    .
    But it appears A) he might not have really lived that long in the first place, and B) even if he did, he used those years to ogle naked women at strip clubs and to continue denying God's existence, which seems to amount basically to rejection of the Holy Ghost, i.e., the unforgivable sin. It might have been, therefore, more merciful for God to have taken him SOONER.
    .
    IOW letting Hawking continue to live for decades leading others into atheism, materialism and self-deification is a sign not of God's mercy but of God's having forsaken this faithless generation of vipers, with sepulchres whitened on the outside but inside full of dead men's bones and all filthiness.
    .
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.