Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: St. Thomas Aquinas Was Not for Enslaving Jews  (Read 3704 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: St. Thomas Aquinas Was Not for Enslaving Jews
« Reply #5 on: October 06, 2018, 02:48:28 AM »
That IS a very, very biased source and very likely disreputable here.

Even then, one should not say it's a good thing that an entire race of people is killed.

Re: St. Thomas Aquinas Was Not for Enslaving Jews
« Reply #6 on: October 06, 2018, 10:22:02 AM »
I couldn't find anything on St. Augustine favoring slavery of the Jews.  Had he, it would have not been chattel, I don't think.

As far as St. Chrysostom goes, one finds this, although it'd have to be stretched beyond its pretty clear meaning (he's talking about God-given chastisements of the Jews in the OT) to get to "he favored killing Jews":


Quote
(5) But what is the source of this hardness? It come from gluttony and drunkenness. Who say so? Moses himself. "Israel ate and was filled and the darling grew fat and frisky". When brute animals feed from a full manger, they grow plump and become more obstinate and hard to hold in check; they endure neither the yoke, the reins, nor the hand of the charioteer. Just so the Jєωιѕн people were driven by their drunkenness and plumpness to the ultimate evil; they kicked about, they failed to accept the yoke of Christ, nor did they pull the plow of his teaching. Another prophet hinted at this when he said: "Israel is as obstinate as a stubborn heifer". And still another called the Jews "an untamed calf".

(6) Although such beasts are unfit for work, they are fit for killing. And this is what happened to the Jews: while they were making themselves unfit for work, they grew fit for slaughter. This is why Christ said: "But as for these my enemies, who did not want me to be king over them, bring them here and slay them". You Jews should have fasted then, when drunkenness was doing those terrible things to you, when your gluttony was giving birth to your ungodliness-not now. Now your fasting is untimely and an abomination. Who said so? Isaiah himself when he called out in a loud voice: "I did not choose this fast, say the Lord". Why? "You quarrel and squabble when you fast and strike those subject to you with your fists". But if you fasting was an abomination when you were striking your fellow slaves, does it become acceptable now that you have slain your Master? How could that be right? (Against the Jews, "Homily 1", paras. 5-6, link)



Re: St. Thomas Aquinas Was Not for Enslaving Jews
« Reply #7 on: October 06, 2018, 01:43:34 PM »
Could it be that the slaughter he refers to is their eternal stay in Gehenna?

Offline rum

Re: St. Thomas Aquinas Was Not for Enslaving Jews
« Reply #8 on: October 06, 2018, 07:53:35 PM »
The papal bulls Dum Diversas (1452) and Romanus Pontifex (1454) sanctioned slavery of pagan Africans.

It strikes me as odd, if true, that no Churchman has ever been in favor of enslaving Jews, when there are instances of Churchmen in favor of enslavement of far less evil peoples than Jews.

Jesuits in this country owned slaves: https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/18/living/georgetown-slavery-service/index.html

Since Jews are the most evil humans, I would think some notable Churchmen of ages past were in favor of enslaving them.

Pagans aren't nearly as bad as Jews.

Re: St. Thomas Aquinas Was Not for Enslaving Jews
« Reply #9 on: October 08, 2018, 10:58:15 AM »

And what is basis for the Ten Commandments?

Do no evil.

Enslaving another human being is evil.