The global rate was estimated at 11.4 per 100,000, with men almost twice as likely as women to take their own lives--rising to as many as three times more male victims than female in some richer countries.
Isn't it the
men who are traditionally responsible for being either the
breadwinners for a household, or developing the
financial security necessary to qualify with a potential father-in-law as a
future breadwinner?
On average, high-income countries had a slightly higher ѕυιcιdє rate--12.7 per 100,000 people--than low-and[-]middle-income nations, where the rate was 11.2.
Isn't it the
high-income countries in which workers--even in
high-tech fields demanding a high degree of education--are significantly
more likely to lose their jobs to
offshoring or invited-
immigrant replacement workers (most notoriously the U.S.
H1b visas) from low-income countries? Including those
high-income jobs most directly derived from products created in the
high-income countries, notably the U.S.A.?
Despite what postWW-II generations were taught in public-school "civics" classes about the nobility of the representative republic(an) government of the U.S.A.,
cui bono? Who is being served by modern federal government policy? Is it its citizenry anymore (even native-born)? Or is it the industrial lobbyists, whose practices & goals have a plainly predictably negative impact on the working or eager-to-work citizenry?
We are living in a virtual hell on earth, and [...] it is all in your head if you complain.
Absent compelling evidence of citizen opposition growing to a strength and ferocity that would force changes in government that're beneficial to the citizenry,
"depression" can be entirely rational as an emotional response.
The report found ѕυιcιdє rates were highest globally among those aged 70 years and over, but highest among the young in some countries--and was the second leading cause of death for 15-29 year-olds globally.
A lot of people od o.d. on pills
Indeed. Or as prescribed consumers of pills as alleged remedies for alleged diseases, notably "autism", ADD or ADHD, U.S. teens shoot up U.S. school children. It qualifies as
news because that kind of deadly incident didn't happen in previous decades. Noticing the obsessive focus of the mainstream media on the
guns involved, a visitor from a distant galaxy might assume that guns were dangerous new inventions, introduced by the same generations of technologists that instroduced cell-phones and personal computers. Of course, guns have been in the hands of rural North Americans since the time of the English colony at Jamestown (Virginia, est.
1607). In fact, the
gift of a gun to a teen in past decades was the secular rural analogue to the Sacrament of
Confirmation. So why didn't rural teens shoot up U.S. school children in past centuries, hmmm?
2. [....] Not everything is a bizarre aberration that can be solved with a pill.
Indeed, but such a rejection is at odds with the
modern psychiatric orientation toward
pathologizing emotions, reactions, and behavior.
[....] asserting the profitable and politically correct psychiatric & psychological view that "depression is a brain disease".
If diseases elsewhere in the body can be remedied with pills, the Doctors of Psychiatry argue, why not "
brain disease"?
Ponder having a psychiatrist
legally hook a 15-29 year-old on drugs: Decades of recurring income from a new patient, and the practical equivalent to a
required lifetime subscription to pills, to be purchased for
many decades, starting perhaps as young as
age 15 !  Never mind that it's a
permanently recurring required expense to the patient. Instead, think of the profits for
Big Pharma!  A psychiatrist shouldn't give even a fraction of a second of thought to how many jobs or other opportunities in life the new patient will be disqualified for by what will become the
extensively docuмented
de fact diagnosis
"mental illness".
The powers to that be and the ruling elite has ways to silence their opposition in their quest in a one world government and a one world currency. [....]
Oh!  Never mind.