.

From page one of this thread:

Quote from: rlee

http://themattwalshblog.com/2014/04/05/hey-gαy-rights-fascists-in-spite-of-your-mozilla-victory-you-will-still-lose/

"Well-deserved" doesn't matter. "Blowback" doesn't matter. Macho screams that "you will lose in the end" from guys who think that a weak argument gets magically transformed into a strong one when you make each sentence you write into its own paragraph may make a few readers feel good as they high-five each other—but they don't matter either. The sad but plain truth is that all this nonsensical "you lose" stuff won't turn even a single head in the ongoing Tribal victory parade through the New Universal Nation that was still recognizably the USA when I was drafted and shipped off to Vietnam to fight for Lord-knows-what in 1967.

Look at a few facts. What is this Walsh guy actually saying, aside from "my wife and I won't like you gαy activists any more"? Forget about a plan of action, does he have a diagnosis? Answer: Not even a clue—at least no clue he's willing to confide to his readers.

He did something similar in his pseudo-hip review of Noah, where he promotes the movie while giving the appearance of rapping it. He talks about the movie's makers being "atheists"; yet he adroitly manages to overlook (conceal, maybe?) the fact that everyone involved with making the flick is a rich, prominent, rabidly Christophobic Jєω. Oy, the irrelevance, the irrelevance!

Here's another fact. Brendan Eich, the Mozilla guy, is not Jєωιѕн. How many rich, important guys are there left in American business who aren't part of the Tribe? Answer: several fewer every single day. Do you think that if by some odd chance the Proposition 8 donor turned out to be, say, Larry Ellison of Oracle, he would have been pressured out of his job, too? If your answer is yes, you've forgotten who owns all the newspapers, all the radio stations, and all the TV networks.

Matt Walsh and folks like him are flesh-and-blood versions of those little valves atop pressure cookers. They permit just enough steam to escape so that the Powerless Many (soon to be the Far More Powerless Minority) can go back to their Bud and Baseball and Final Four and Blu-ray discs of Transformers LXXVII with that warm-all-over feeling of having been good Americans. They can also look forward with bright eyes and smiles to an election in a few months, wherein a bunch of Republicans may end up replacing a bunch of Democrats. And what will their great accomplishment be? Why, they will take the hated and immoral and dysfunctionally Communist ObamaCare program and … and … change not a single damn thing about it.

Matt Walsh will cheer and cheer, I bet. And sadly, at least some of his readers will cheer about "well-deserved blowback."

I shall be dead before Matt Walsh is a lot older, but a lot of CI commenters will be living five or six or seven decades into the new Jєωιѕн-run, minority-staffed, and ethnically fragmented USA. The only blowback anyone will be able to look forward to in this transformed country will involve the kind where clubs or tasers come into contact with white Catholics heads and private parts. Think of that as your family gathers around the dear old 96-incher to cheer on the rich guys.

I ran across a conversation on another website (  newsbusters.org  ) that took place 10 days ago.  Apparently when the news went "viral" it was a hot topic for ONE DAY and then Mozilla reacted and demanded Brendan Eich to step down.  I have to wonder what would have happened if they had taken no action at all?  I doubt the media frenzy could have endured for more than a day or two, and if they had handled it right, they could have used the controversy to make their Firefox even more widely recognized, and even MORE popular.  As it is, they're LOSING users, so kow-tow-ing to the Yids and the Sodomites has seemed to have BACKFIRED:  






Avatar
libssuk • 10 days ago

If you conform and refer to ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs as "gαy", you have already lost half the battle. That allows the left to set the agenda and direction of the discussion. They are ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs (and they hate that word! So use it everytime.).

26
•
Share ›

    Avatar
    SleezyPreezyofTheUnitedSteezy libssuk • 10 days ago

    I noticed that. They also hate when you point out that all men who sɛҳuąƖly molest boys, are by definition ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ pedophiles.
    17
    •
    Share ›
        Avatar
        unknown SleezyPreezyofTheUnitedSteezy • 10 days ago

        Remember that story in Florida of the two girls having a relationship and one was a minor? The media ignored the fact that the accused was having a relationship with someone who was underage and instead framed her as a victim of the homophobia.
        4
        •
        Share ›
        Avatar
        Steve Weinstein SleezyPreezyofTheUnitedSteezy • 10 days ago

        I agree that men who molest boys are ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ pedophiles. I also would say that they are represent less percentage of adult gαy men than straight men who molest young girls. But why on earth would you think people would deny this?
        •
        Share ›
    Avatar
    celtic cross libssuk • 10 days ago

    Their next move will be to have anyone who uses the term ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ to be fired immediately.
    11
    •
    Share ›
        Avatar
        notfondoflibs celtic cross • 10 days ago

        Not surprising at all. There is an Ivy League professor who believes that anyone who opposes man made global warming should be jailed. Now we know who the real nαzιs are.
        9
        •
        Share ›
            Avatar
            celtic cross notfondoflibs • 10 days ago

            I can hear it now: Obama! Sieg Heil!
            2
            •
            Share ›
        Avatar
        Guest celtic cross • 10 days ago

        If and when the conflict begins (and I hope and pray that it doesn’t), it won’t be in the form of waves of brothers against brothers. It will probably be in the form of “Armies of One” employing methods similar to those used in Operation Phoenix during the Vietnam war. The targets will be Dem politicians and the Media.
        3
        •
        Share ›
    Avatar
    Mother124 Mod libssuk • 10 days ago

    Did anyone ever ask you if it was OK for Hispanics to call you Anglo or Gringo?
    7
    •
    Share ›
        Avatar
        libssuk Mother124 • 10 days ago

        ....or blacks to call me whitey or cracker. "African-American" is another I won't use- I don't believe in hyphenated Americans. You are either American or you aren't.
        12
        •
        Share ›
        Avatar
        TugboatPhil Mother124 • 10 days ago

        There was a survey done in South America a year or two back where college aged kids were asked if they preferred being called Hispanic or Latino. A majority had never heard of either word and wanted to be known as a citizen of their particular country.

        Apparently those are words the left assigned to them here in the US.
        8
        •
        Share ›
            Avatar
            AlmostaCowboy TugboatPhil • 10 days ago

            And I was surprised to learn during several trips to Costa Rica that the blacks there (who are referred to as "Ticos", like everyone else) aren't consumed by their antecedents' slavery. Imagine.
            8
            •
            Share ›
                Avatar
                Blonde Gator Mod AlmostaCowboy • 10 days ago

                Everyone (native) in CR is either a "Tico" or a "Tica" (masculine/feminine). CR is a melting pot....on the Carribean side, you see many more dark skinned (Carribean/African), in the north, Indos (Mayan/Aztec) and on the Pacific, a mish mash, even many of oriental extraction.

                The food there, regardless of the area, sucks. It is just very mild and non-descript. The first thing I learned is you can never go wrong w/chicken & rice there. And that is true. But it's culinary tradition isn't much to speak about.

                For example, in CR, you can get a "tamale" (which is a delight in Mexico, Tex Mex, and other cuisines)....but in CR it's merely a masa (corn) dumpling...and maybe has some underseasoned something or other in it. *sigh*. Fresh fruit is the best choice there. And hearts of palm & avacado salad.
                •
                Share ›
            Avatar
            EdwardT TugboatPhil • 10 days ago

            In a grocery store near where I live, the sign in the grocery aisle that had the Mexican food said 'Hispanic Foods' which I thought was ridiculous seeing how Mexican food/ingredients are distinctly Mexican and not found at all in any other Latin American countries. Ask for a tortilla in South America and you might get something resembling an omelette.
            4
            •
            Share ›
                Avatar
                Mother124 Mod EdwardT • 10 days ago

                Yes, we lived in Madrid for 3 years and a "Tortilla Espanola" is an omelet with potatoes and onions.
                •
                Share ›
    Avatar
    1389AD libssuk • 10 days ago

    They are sodomites.
    4
    •
    Share ›



[I found this one noteworthy -- Artie really needs to convert and become Catholic and start reading CathInfo and TheRecusant and Sacrificium.org and then Artie wouldn't have all these questions unanswered anymore!]




Avatar
Artie • 10 days ago

First, what the Sam Hill is "OKCupid" and why do they have so much influence? Second, I don't have to state for anybody here that we are living in scary times. We are living in an America where if you said or did something, five, ten twenty or forty years ago, the current conventional thinking will condemn and crucify you without so much as even a hearing. This isn't the America I grew up in. I don't know what happened but somewhere along the way something turned very sour. Did we do it? As conservatives we've voted for candidates who mostly reflected our world view. It appears they didn't really reflect that worldview. I know this case has nothing to do with voting, but it trickles down. How did these people like OKCupid get their mind set? Somewhere, somehow along the line, somebody has let America down. I don't know who it was, but somebody did. The country that elected an incompetent community organizer president, twice, because of the color of his skin and not the content of his character is capable of anything. I've always said infringement leading to loss of our rights wont come from government, but from private groups like OKCupid and the ACLU, using Bill Clinton's tried and proven technique, the politics of personal destruction. And there is no appeal from this court of emotions.

18
•
Share ›

Avatar
CRITTERCOLLECTOR • 10 days ago

No longer use firefox. Not against gαy marriage, I am against bullying, and forcing people to conform.

17
•
Share ›

    Avatar
    FlaVet CRITTERCOLLECTOR • 10 days ago

    Liberals don't believe there is a fundamental right to keep and bear arms, but DO believe there is a fundamental right of a woman to vacuum her baby's brain out and call it "reproductive freedom," for a lazy stoner to get high in public and call it "recreation," and for a man to insert his raging member into another man's rear end and call it "consummating a marriage."

    And now...it's their militant angry Gestapo to deny a citizen free speech, freedom of association, confidence in the voting process and our right to privacy in our homes and business. And safety in a career or jobs that we'll be able to keep them is being lost while we look on.
    17
    •
    Share ›
    Avatar
    tobythetiger CRITTERCOLLECTOR • 8 days ago

    Well said my friend....I don't hate the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ but I am just tired of them trying to say if I don't except them, I am a bad person...I love all sinners....God will judge us all one day.....
    5
    •
    Share ›
        Avatar
        CRITTERCOLLECTOR tobythetiger • 7 days ago

        (love your name!!)
        1
        •
        Share ›
    Avatar
    helen willis CRITTERCOLLECTOR • 10 days ago

    I don't use Firefox, either. FF really needed some new blood; they are having some problems with their browser, which is why I changed hours before the new CEO was hired.
    4
    •
    Share ›
        Avatar
        floridavet helen willis • 10 days ago

        What do you use in place of FF?
        1
        •
        Share ›
            Avatar
            FlaVet floridavet • 10 days ago

            Safari is a fine browser...then there's Opera too....Google Chrome is fast. Try them...I ditched FireFartfox last night.
            5
            •
            Share ›
                Avatar
                floridavet FlaVet • 10 days ago

                I've been experimenting with Chrome...it doesn't seem to bad, but I've never tried Safari or Opera Thanks for the heads up, I will check them out.
                •
                Share ›
                    Avatar
                    FlaVet floridavet • 10 days ago

                    Safari is an Apple product. I've used it for years and it's very customizable and quick. And it works well with PC's...so it's not an exclusive Mac product. And unlike IE Explorer... is doesn't hijack your operating system so Safari can be deleted or uninstalled, unlike IE.
                    •
                    Share ›
                        Avatar
                        floridavet FlaVet • 10 days ago

                        I'm definitely checking it out. Thanks again...
                        2
                        •
                        Share ›
                            Avatar
                            FlaVet floridavet • 10 days ago

                            Just make certain you allow Safari or whatever new browser you choose...to import your bookmarks and favorites...before you blow out the Firefox...
                            2
                            •
                            Share ›
            Avatar
            helen willis floridavet • 10 days ago

            For the time being, I am using IE and Google Chrome but plan to check out a couple more. I've used one browser that opens NB columns but not the blogging sections, so I was switching back and forth.. Google Chrome has its share of glitches, so I won't stay with that browser unless they happen to be the best of the worst.
            1
            •
            Share ›
                Avatar
                floridavet helen willis • 10 days ago

                Thanks...I used to use IE all the time until I got tired of hearing about all the security breaches, and I've used Chrome a bit as well. Might be time to give IE another look.

                I hate to give up FF because I really like the browser....but I like even less some insignificant ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ agenda-driven website having so much influence over Mozilla, and even less the fact that they succuмbed to it. Pretty tired of the tail wagging the dog, so it's probably so long Firefox....
                4
                •
                Share ›
                    Avatar
                    helen willis floridavet • 10 days ago

                    Since I got tired of fighting FF glitches, I wasn't sad to see it go. I'm going to try different browsers for a while and see how efficiently they operate. I'm disgusted with the activists for ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs, and I'm tired of our government instigating this s*h*t. I got a really nasty post from someone I've known for several years and got along well with. He's gαy. I was fine with that; then his crappy post. I'm not ok with that!
                    3
                    •
                    Share ›

Avatar
Rusty • 10 days ago

He donated $1,000 in 2008 to prop 8 ... and ABC says that donation put him on the same level as those DEMOCRATS protesting funerals ....I will boycott Firefox every chance I get ..and will put them right next to Sam Adams Beer and Heineken... Stop being bullied by the INTOLERANT ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖS who ironically demand TOLERANCE ....

10
•
Share ›

Avatar
helen willis • 10 days ago

In this country, we are rapidly losing free speech. We are going downhill fast, and MSM is moving this disaster along at lightening speed.

8
•
Share ›

    Avatar
    Mother124 Mod helen willis • 10 days ago

    I agree, Helen. Isn't it funny that gαys started out only wanting to be left alone?

    Now, anyone who doesn't CELEBRATE their lifestyle is villified.

    Pedophilia is the next goal; the push has already started.
    11
    •
    Share ›
        Avatar
        TugboatPhil Mother124 • 10 days ago

        And using their own logic, if Mr Eich = Fred Phelps, then h0m0sɛҳuąƖs = p3d0philes.
        3
        •
        Share ›
        Avatar
        helen willis Mother124 • 10 days ago

        Not only does a person have to celebrate the lifestyle, he/she has to vilify all who believe anything any different. I believe the gαy issue drives liberals, uniting them, but they don't realize they are being used by the current culture to tear down the freedoms we now have, which protect them.
        2
        •
        Share ›
            Avatar
            Mother124 Mod helen willis • 10 days ago

            It's certainly an inordinate amount of power wielded by 2% of the population.
            Tyranny of the Minority.
            •
            Share ›
    Avatar
    celtic cross helen willis • 10 days ago

    Apparently, the internet is being used for the same thing...don't forget disqus and the down arrow tactic. It's only a tiny smidgen, but little by little freedom of speech is being chipped away.
    5
    •
    Share ›

Avatar
blondethinker • 10 days ago

Paint them all with same brush, and use an ugly color! So say we all: the gαy mafia!
errr make that the gαy gestapo...thanks FlaVet!

8
•
Share ›

    Avatar
    EdwardT blondethinker • 10 days ago

    No...they're not 'gαy'. gαy = happy. These people are disgusting deviant perverts.
    7
    •
    Share ›
    Avatar
    FlaVet blondethinker • 10 days ago

    The Mafia had some honor...what this is ...is the gαy Gestapo. Same tactics...same goals.
    3
    •
    Share ›
        Avatar
        Mother124 Mod FlaVet • 10 days ago

        Speaking of the gαy Gestapo, that's exactly what Tammy Bruce called them.

        http://twitchy.com/2014/04/04/...
        3
        •
        Share ›
            Avatar
            aemoreira81 Mother124 • 10 days ago

            Except that Tammy Bruce doesn't know the difference between resign and fire. Eich can't be a victim because he resigned from the top position of a company...who above him could have fired him?
            •
            Share ›
                Avatar
                UpNorth2 aemoreira81 • 10 days ago

                "Who above him could have fired him?" How about the same people who made him the CEO? Strange that in all of your "expertise", you know nothing about how a corporation is run.
                2
                •
                Share ›
                    Avatar
                    aemoreira81 UpNorth2 • 10 days ago

                    How about the same people who made him the CEO?

                    That would be---Eich himself, as he was one of the co-founders. The actual impetus for the resignation was a threatened mass resignation of employees on the technical side---without whom Mozilla could not function. Many of the employees did not want to work for Eich, and it became a case of he goes or they go.
                    •
                    Share ›
                        Avatar
                        UpNorth2 aemoreira81 • 10 days ago

                        I don't believe I addressed what the employees were doing, did I? You asked a question, I answered it. Your attention wanders a lot. Read the first sentence of the statement in the linked article, from the Board of Directors of Mozilla. https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/...
                        1
                        •
                        Share ›
        Avatar
        libssuk FlaVet • 10 days ago

        Resistance is Futile. You will be assimilated.
        Edited to add the /s tag.
        •
        Share ›
            Avatar
            EdwardT libssuk • 10 days ago

            Better to die on your feet than live on your knees...
            5
            •
            Share ›
                Avatar
                FW Ken EdwardT • 10 days ago

                You did not just say that!

                ;-)
                3
                •
                Share ›
            Avatar
            FlaVet libssuk • 10 days ago

            I'll never be a disgusting sodomite supporter.
            3
            •
            Share ›
                Avatar
                celtic cross FlaVet • 10 days ago

                ...or an enabler.
                3
                •
                Share ›
    Avatar
    unknown blondethinker • 10 days ago

    These homophobes are one in the same after all /sarc.
    2
    •
    Share ›
    Avatar
    Rich Mannix blondethinker • 10 days ago

    Use rainbow spray paint
    1
    •
    Share ›

Avatar
Independent Voter • 10 days ago

The REAL bullies are exposed - the angry left.

We can always depend on tantrums, threats, name calling, insults and the like. Anything but facts common sense or a real debate.

The left sees themselves as the master debaters.

5
•
Share ›

Avatar
mj01323 • 10 days ago

All the more reason I never ever watch Good Morning America. Ms. Janis is apparently a bigoted pro-abortion, anti traditional marriage moonbat. Same for other on air personalities at GMA. She is appears to be a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, or at least an open supporter of LGBTQIA who is comfortable with lying on air. I never heard of Brandon Eich until this week, but I know of the radical, hating, bigoted ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs who dominate the news. It can only be because the legacy media, including ABC News, is primarily run by other radical ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs. Needless to say, comparing a contributions to California Prop. 8 is nothing like the actions of Fred Phelps and his band of protestors. I would observe that Linzie Janis more closely resembles with Fred Phelps than does Brendan Eich.

4
•
Share ›

Avatar
Newshound24 • 10 days ago

A cινιℓ ωαr is brewing, I think. We will only endure tyrants like these leftists trampling our freedoms and robbing us of our jobs, and our liberty for so long. The coming elections are shaping up to be a war between those who work for a living, and those who vote for a living.

4
•
Share ›

Avatar
Newshound24 • 10 days ago

During the Bush years, every time any liberal was ever criticized in any way for saying they didn't like Republican X, or conservative issue Y, the liberal media would plaster the airwaves with headlines and broadcasts that almost all seemed to use this headline:
"A CHILL WIND BLOWS AGAINST FREE SPEECH IN AMERICA TODAY". The object of course was to paint a picture of republican/conservative repression and fascism.

They will never recognize their own hypocrisy and corruption. Where are their stories now about "A chill wind" blowing against free speech? Huh? HUH??

4
•
Share ›

    Avatar
    bicentennialguy Newshound24 • 10 days ago

    Mobs are immune to their own hypocrisy.
    1
    •
    Share ›

Avatar
celtic cross • 10 days ago

I'm disgusted with Firefox. Anybody have any suggestions for a suitable replacement?

4
•
Share ›

    Avatar
    EdwardT celtic cross • 10 days ago

    When you uninstall Firefox, first use the 'feedback' function to inform them why.
    1
    •
    Share ›
        Avatar
        celtic cross EdwardT • 10 days ago

        thanks
        2
        •
        Share ›
        Avatar
        FlaVet EdwardT • 10 days ago

        Excellent suggestion. They're not the only way to get on the web...let them know they're fascists, period.
        •
        Share ›
    Avatar
    FlaVet celtic cross • 10 days ago

    Try Safari, Opera or Chrome.
    •
    Share ›
        Avatar
        celtic cross FlaVet • 10 days ago

        Okee doke, thanks.
        1
        •
        Share ›
            Avatar
            FlaVet celtic cross • 10 days ago

            I really like Safari.
            1
            •
            Share ›

Avatar
michael lofrano • 10 days ago

If you are using Firefox as your browser, as I was, delete it and go to CHROME or IE. Do not support in any way people who think they have a right to rob a person of their livelihood because they think differently or hold different values than they do.. Mozilla is being run by intolerant, hateful thugs. Do not be a party to their thuggery by using their browser..

3
•
Share ›

    Avatar
    EdwardT michael lofrano • 10 days ago

    Also be sure to let them know how you feel:

    https://input.mozilla.org/en-U...

    ...and also check out some of the other responses:

    https://input.mozilla.org/en-U...
    •
    Share ›

Avatar
OpedAnderson • 10 days ago

Totally wrong that he had to step down.

3
•
Share ›

Avatar
Sod Buster • 10 days ago

In 2008 who else publicly opposed same sex unions?
.
The boRAT!!!

3
•
Share ›

    Avatar
    aemoreira81 Sod Buster • 10 days ago

    In 2008, Obama did not have to adhere to the COTUS. Yes Obama has not adhered to it in everything, but what argument could Obama have presented to have the federal DOMA upheld? (The strikedown should have been 9-0 instead of 5-4.)
    •
    Share ›
        Avatar
        General_Company aemoreira81 • 10 days ago

        Are you freakin kidding me? The Judicial branch is supposed to uphold the legislative branch, and the constitution, not re-write it. Further more, it's not up the Fed, it's a States Rights issue, and I dont mean some leftist, wacko, nutcase, gαy, Judge either.
        2
        •
        Share ›
            Avatar
            aemoreira81 General_Company • 10 days ago

            The judicial branch is supposed to uphold the Constitution first---and everything else second. The COTUS never authorized a federal DOMA. In what way was it re-written? Did someone hijack your account?
            •
            Share ›
                Avatar
                General_Company aemoreira81 • 10 days ago

                Never authorized Abortion, Slavery, or Separation of Church and State either. so whats your point?

                So you believe the Judicial is supposed to write legislation, and re-write the meaning of words?

                Did someone hijacked your brain?
                1
                •
                Share ›
                    Avatar
                    aemoreira81 General_Company • 10 days ago

                    Abortion: correct.
                    Slavery: authorized until 13A.
                    Separation of church and state: Never ruled on despite what half of America thinks.

                    The judiciary is supposed to rule based on the COTUS only even if it means overturning popular laws.
                    •
                    Share ›
                        Avatar
                        General_Company aemoreira81 • 10 days ago

                        The Judicial has made rulings on all sorts of things, that they had no business in. Including the items I mentioned.

                        Fact is, when the leftist cant sway the Voters, or Legislatures, they go Judiciary shopping till they find a sympathetic ear.

                        There is a process for achieving gαy marriage or repealing the DOMA, problem is, leftist have no use for it, or the Constitution.
                        1
                        •
                        Share ›
                            Avatar
                            aemoreira81 General_Company • 10 days ago

                            gαy marriage and DOMA are not the same. If Congress had no authority to pass the law in the first place...the law must be killed by the courts.
                            •
                            Share ›
                                Avatar
                                celtic cross aemoreira81 • 10 days ago

                                A 5-4 decision in the SCOTUS and the judiciary overturning the wishes of the voters in multiple cases....yeah, now that's what I call the spirit of the Constitution...NOT. ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ "marriage" will be the same contentious issue as abortion has been. When the courts go against the will of the people, all they do is create chaos.
                                •
                                Share ›





[Uhh... correction:  the will of the people is irrelevant compared to the will of God.  So long as God's will is ignored, there will eventually be chaos.  

If their reply is, "How can anyone know the will of God?" The answer is, "That is what the Church is for."  If they say, "Which 'church' are you talking about? -- there are so many!"  -the answer is, "There is only one true Church, outside of which there is no salvation."  If they counter, "But all the churches make that claim!  How can you know which one is true?"  -the answer is, only the Roman Catholic Church can PROVE this claim by historical evidence and the revelation of God.  &c.  It's going to take the Collegial Consecration of Russia to the IHM before God will put this nonsense to rest, and then again, the miraculous intervention of God through Our Lady, will show how invincible the one true religion is, and not before then.]




                                Avatar
                                General_Company aemoreira81 • 10 days ago

                                Good grief, did I say they were the same? How come we are always a Democracy, until you leftist find you cant get your way?

                                If the same body can pass a law authorizing the theft of personal property and labors, then I have no idea how you think they cant tell you the definition of what marriage is, or navigable waters, or what contracts you can enter in, what you kids should be taught, or what health care you dont get?

                                Whats the point of the Constitution, if 9 unaccountable humans get to make up law?
                                •
                                Share ›
        Avatar
        UpNorth2 aemoreira81 • 10 days ago

        Back to your role as the advisor for SCOTUS again? Which law school did you graduate from, as you seem to fancy yourself a legal expert? I say that, after reading your "The strikedown should have been" statement.
        3
        •
        Share ›


.