Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Sneakyticks?  (Read 880 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline roscoe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7610
  • Reputation: +617/-404
  • Gender: Male
Sneakyticks?
« on: August 15, 2014, 01:35:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Whatever happened to Sneakyticks?     :smile:
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'


    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4577/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Sneakyticks?
    « Reply #1 on: August 15, 2014, 01:42:12 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • He was banned for dogmatic sedevacantism.
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.


    Offline BTNYC

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2777
    • Reputation: +3122/-97
    • Gender: Male
    Sneakyticks?
    « Reply #2 on: August 15, 2014, 07:57:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Cantarella
    He was banned for dogmatic sedevacantism.


    What? But there's no such thing as "sedevacantism..." How can someone be dogmatic about a nonexistent phenomenon?

    He should have been banned for denying the all important dogma of "E rev around S" (sic).
      :smoke-pot: :fryingpan: :smoke-pot: :fryingpan: :smoke-pot: :fryingpan:

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41846
    • Reputation: +23909/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Sneakyticks?
    « Reply #3 on: August 15, 2014, 09:34:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Actually he was banned for crude language and insults against a priest.

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4577/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Sneakyticks?
    « Reply #4 on: August 15, 2014, 11:49:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Actually he was banned for crude language and insults against a priest.


    You are quiet right. I was under the wrong impression.

    I retract my previous post.
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.


    Offline claudel

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1776
    • Reputation: +1335/-419
    • Gender: Male
    Sneakyticks?
    « Reply #5 on: August 15, 2014, 02:22:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't believe for a second that Sneakyticks is actually gone, except under that particular screen name. "Sneakyticks" was just the latest avatar of Exurge/Pelele/Vinikias/Cathedra and several other trollish identities, all of whom Matthew banned at one time or another. I recall at least one Bible thread where he commented as both Vinikias and Cathedra, each speaking in support of the other's "insightful" statements. Talk about brass!

    Given that he has always had two or three CI handles at any given time, he is almost certainly still around and will make himself felt yet again in due course.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41846
    • Reputation: +23909/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Sneakyticks?
    « Reply #6 on: August 15, 2014, 02:43:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: claudel
    I recall at least one Bible thread where he commented as both Vinikias and Cathedra, each speaking in support of the other's "insightful" statements. Talk about brass!


     :roll-laugh1:

    I wonder if LoT and Ambrose are really just the same person patting himself on the back and doing the

     :rahrah:  :applause:

    thing for himself.