Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings  (Read 11538 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SJB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5171
  • Reputation: +1929/-2
  • Gender: Male
Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
« on: July 28, 2012, 04:19:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Canon Law Digest, 1959
    CANON 1395

    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings (Holy Office, 6 March, 1959) AAS 51-271.

    A Notification by tbe Holy Office:

    The Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, having examined the alleged visions and revelations of Sister Faustina Kowalska of the Institute of Our Lady of Mercy, who died in 1938 near Cracow, has decreed as follows:

    1. The distribution of pictures and writings which present the
    devotion to the Divine Mercy in the forms proposed by this
    Sister Faustina, should be forbidden;

    2. It is left to the prudent discretion of the Bishops to remove
    such pictures which may have been already exposed for worship.
    From the Holy Office, 6 March, 1959.

    AAS 51-271; Holy Office, Notification, 6 March, 1959.




    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil

    Offline JohnGrey

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 602
    • Reputation: +556/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #1 on: July 28, 2012, 05:28:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Canon Law Digest, 1959
    CANON 1395

    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings (Holy Office, 6 March, 1959) AAS 51-271.

    A Notification by tbe Holy Office:

    The Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, having examined the alleged visions and revelations of Sister Faustina Kowalska of the Institute of Our Lady of Mercy, who died in 1938 near Cracow, has decreed as follows:

    1. The distribution of pictures and writings which present the
    devotion to the Divine Mercy in the forms proposed by this
    Sister Faustina, should be forbidden;

    2. It is left to the prudent discretion of the Bishops to remove
    such pictures which may have been already exposed for worship.
    From the Holy Office, 6 March, 1959.

    AAS 51-271; Holy Office, Notification, 6 March, 1959.


    This was under the false pontificate of Angelo Roncalli, but I believe that it was also a reiteration of a prior suppression by HH Pius XII.  Do you have the AAS for that?  Perhaps Hobbles, as Librarian General of the forum, has it among his seemingly inexhaustible sources?


    Offline Sede Catholic

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1306
    • Reputation: +1028/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #2 on: July 28, 2012, 05:41:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You are corecty that it is merely an invalid ban by Antipope John XXIII.

    Pope Pius XII did NOT ban The Divine Mercy.

    Offline Sede Catholic

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1306
    • Reputation: +1028/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #3 on: July 28, 2012, 05:43:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • SJB is seeking to divert attention away from his own sordid private life, which can be read about on another current thread.

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1929/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #4 on: July 28, 2012, 05:43:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Sede Catholic
    You are corecty that it is merely an invalid ban by Antipope John XXIII.

    Pope Pius XII did NOT ban The Divine Mercy.


    The Holy Office under Cardinal Ottaviani banned Divine Mercy. Do you reject the Holy Office in 1959?
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil


    Offline Sede Catholic

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1306
    • Reputation: +1028/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #5 on: July 28, 2012, 05:47:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, I do, because all Vatican Offices lost their authority upon the death of Pope Pius XII.

    Also, Cardinal Ottaviani did not ban The Divine Mercy.

    Cardinal Ottaviani supported The Divine Mercy.

    It was invalidly banned by Antipope John XXIII.

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1929/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #6 on: July 28, 2012, 05:56:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Sede Catholic
    Yes, I do, because all Vatican Offices lost their authority upon the death of Pope Pius XII.

    Also, Cardinal Ottaviani did not ban The Divine Mercy.

    Cardinal Ottaviani supported The Divine Mercy.

    It was invalidly banned by Antipope John XXIII.


    Well, that's an extreme opinion  :rolleyes: When Pius XII died, everybody lost their offices???

    Cardinal Ottaviani was the head of the Holy Office.
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil

    Offline Hobbledehoy

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3746
    • Reputation: +4804/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #7 on: July 28, 2012, 06:14:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: JohnGrey
    Do you have the AAS for that?  Perhaps Hobbles, as Librarian General of the forum, has it among his seemingly inexhaustible sources?


    The author(s) of the Canon Law Digest (Rev. Fr. Bouscaren?) SJB cited did indeed give such a citation. It is indeed in in A. A. S., vol, li., p. 271. The original text is Italian, and it indeed was issued by the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office.

    Canon Law Digest is one of the [many] things that are not in my library. SJB is quite fortunate to posses such a treasure.
    Please ignore all that I have written regarding sedevacantism.


    Offline Sede Catholic

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1306
    • Reputation: +1028/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #8 on: July 28, 2012, 06:24:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Robert J B
    Quote from: Sede Catholic
    Yes, I do, because all Vatican Offices lost their authority upon the death of Pope Pius XII.

    Also, Cardinal Ottaviani did not ban The Divine Mercy.

    Cardinal Ottaviani supported The Divine Mercy.

    It was invalidly banned by Antipope John XXIII.


    Well, that's an extreme opinion  :rolleyes: When Pius XII died, everybody lost their offices???

    Cardinal Ottaviani was the head of the Holy Office.


    Yes, when Pope Pius XII died, the head of the Holy Office did indeed lose his authority, which is what happened when a Pope died under the way the Vatican was organized before Vatican II.

    Only a new Pope could re-appoint the head of the Holy Office.

    John XXIII was an Antipope, therefore he did not have the authority to re- apppoint anyone.  

    Offline Sede Catholic

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1306
    • Reputation: +1028/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #9 on: July 28, 2012, 06:25:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Pope Pius XII and Cardinal Ottaviani both favoured The Divine Mercy.

    It was only opposed by an Antipope, which is obviously unimportant.

    Offline Sede Catholic

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1306
    • Reputation: +1028/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #10 on: July 28, 2012, 06:29:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • SJB only started this thread because of the questions that I raised about his financial activities on another thread.

    You can read the sensational details here:

    http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=19821&min=70&num=10

    Enjoy.


    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1929/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #11 on: July 28, 2012, 06:50:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Sede Catholic
    Yes, I do, because all Vatican Offices lost their authority upon the death of Pope Pius XII.

    Also, Cardinal Ottaviani did not ban The Divine Mercy.

    Cardinal Ottaviani supported The Divine Mercy.

    It was invalidly banned by Antipope John XXIII.


    Well, that's an extreme opinion  :rolleyes: When Pius XII died, everybody lost their offices???

    Cardinal Ottaviani was the head of the Holy Office.


    I started the thread to show what a Sede Flake you are and because you threatened me in a PM telling me not to discuss Divine Mercy in public.

    You try to bully people who don't agree with you. I'm fighting back. Are you not used to that?
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8213
    • Reputation: +7161/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #12 on: July 28, 2012, 06:57:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • SJB, you say Sede Catholic tries to bully people who don't agree with him, yet GertrudetheGreat (JL) launched horrible slander at me and several other members for disagreeing with him and you won't call him out for it. That's a double standard.

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1929/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #13 on: July 28, 2012, 07:05:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    SJB, you say Sede Catholic tries to bully people who don't agree with him, yet GertrudetheGreat (JL) launched horrible slander at me and several other members for disagreeing with him and you won't call him out for it. That's a double standard.


    Deal with the issue at hand and then we can discuss whatever it is you are referring to ... Btw, are you agreeing that Sede Flake is a bully?
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8213
    • Reputation: +7161/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Sister Faustina Kowalska: Writings
    « Reply #14 on: July 28, 2012, 07:08:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I didn't say Sede is a bully.

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16