You inferred incorrectly. I am just saying that people who tend to believe in cօռspιʀαcιҽs tend to believe in more than one
And people who disbelieve in them tend to believe in none. On principle. As though such acts of deception couldn't happen. As though the established view of things must be correct, or at least, shouldn't be challenged.
What people believe from consensus is naturally going to seem more "sane" - and when someone tries to understand things from various, conflicting sources, that are not accepted, then one is accepting ideas that are bound to seem a lot more wild in general. It takes a great deal of critical acuмen to discern which stories of conspiracy are credible and which are fabricated.
Wild speculation about many many topics is a problem for many people who believe in conspiracy.
But Catholics know there is a masonic conspiracy, as the Popes told us. And we can see the influence of the Jєωs in the world. It's very apparent. The state of Israel, and its immense influence, is not something that has occurred because Jєωs are a "weak" minority. Consider Charles de Gaulle's quote on Jєωs:
"an elite people, sure of themselves and domineering"
And who succeeded de Gaulle, after terrible riots and the '68 cultural revolution, which thrust him out of power?
Pompidou, assistant to the Rothschilds.
There are many, many, many historical facts that come together that clash fundamentally with what is typically granted to be "historical consensus"
Talking about these facts does not get one any books or academic papers published, rather it gets you marginalized, hated, and labeled. And of course accused of being a "nαzι" and a "kook."
There are true cօռspιʀαcιҽs - and there is ONE grand conspiracy, that has been developing for some time now. Don't doubt it. It is very anti-Christian. It fits into Christian eschatology.