Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: sedevacantist message boards???  (Read 5401 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline curiouscatholic23

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 388
  • Reputation: +0/-1
  • Gender: Male
sedevacantist message boards???
« on: September 18, 2011, 01:26:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As much as I enjoy reading this website, I am wondering if their are any sedevacantist websites out there that have message boards that have a lot of posters. I am sick of visiting huttongibson.com/ MHFM youtube page every day looking for videos, I need something more. Its very important to me right now because I am in a situation in which I will be without the sacraments for 3-5 months beginning tomorrow.

    To be honest it kind of disgusts me Bishop Fellay is even negotiating with this Vatican II sect, considering they have no catholic authority.

    If you know of any sede websites/message boards please PM me.


    Offline PartyIsOver221

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1238
    • Reputation: +640/-1
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #1 on: September 18, 2011, 04:10:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Sede forums? Wow really hard. The devil and his minions go after them hard-core and pretty much remove them from existence before they have a chance to blossom.

    If anyone finds of any that still exist today, let me know too...not turning on CI , but its just out of curiosity for others like us.


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31182
    • Reputation: +27095/-494
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #2 on: September 18, 2011, 04:12:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This question (or a similar one) comes up a lot.

    There are a handful of insignificant sedevacantist fora, but none with even 1/10 the traffic or membership of CathInfo.

    Let's just say there's a reason why CathInfo has so many sedevacantists. They want a board with some activity.

    Especially for all the single sedevacantist guys (=plenty of time on one's hands), you're going to need a forum that's "CathInfo or greater" in terms of size and activity. Such a forum doesn't exist in a strict Sedevacantist flavor.

    I personally have a theory (proven by a certain amount of scientific data) that people don't want to be a member of a forum where people are TOO narrowly focused. People want a bit of variety thrown in, or it's too boring. No one wants to be a member of "Rural Catholics of Irish heritage", even if that perfectly describes them. Variety is the spice of life. (Corollary: No variety, no spice.)

    There's just no motivation to post if everyone on the forum agrees with you. Please don't take this the wrong way, but I'm quite confident about this point.

    To return to my example, I can only read so many posts along the lines of  
    Quote from: Rural Catholic of Irish Heritage
    Yesterday, while walking to the family garden, I took in all the beauty of my acreage, and I sang "Whiskey in the Jar".

    I'm listening to the Clancy Bros. right now. How about you?


    The Incorruptibles was a spin-off of Fisheaters, set up to be "FishEaters without the drama". Today the forum no longer exists. About 120 people signed up, but they rarely posted.

    Even Gladius_Veritatis and several other hard-core sedevacantists used to be members of Fisheaters for crying out loud, and many might still be there today if they had a choice.  Of course, when Fisheaters still allowed sedevacantists they only had around 700 members...

    I personally think CathInfo is just the right balance of focus (Catholicism; no atheists, non-Catholics or de-facto heretics) with variety (sede, SSPX, and other trad Catholics).
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #3 on: September 18, 2011, 04:22:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • CatholicInfo's activity and variety are exactly why I dedided not to leave. I didn't want to give up Traditional Catholic forums and looked elsewhere. CAF is more active than CatholicInfo but I have no desire to post there what-so-ever. So I realized this is the best forum for me.

    There aren't any sede forums out there that I know of, except for the now-closed St. Bellarmine forums. Any others out there aren't popular. I remember getting emails from some Father C followers last year raving about how "Matthew did this, Matthew did that" (I assume they were banned from here). They started their own forum but no one signed up. I can imagine why.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Hobbledehoy

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3746
    • Reputation: +4806/-6
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #4 on: September 18, 2011, 04:36:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matthew
    I personally have a theory (proven by a certain amount of scientific data) that people don't want to be a member of a forum where people are TOO narrowly focused.


    YES!


    One good reason for that is that the moderators of such fora tend to be tyrannically arbitrary in their moderating behavior, censuring opinions contrary to their own, belittling certain forum-members who have a different "take" of the issues that conflicts with their interests and agendas, super-exalting grovelling party-liners, &c.

    As I have told you in a PM sometime ago, I as a sedevacantist would never join a "sede forum" or a forum run by "sedes." It's all too creepy for me sometimes.

    Here at CathInfo there is not only activity and variety, but also a balance insofar as one can see "the other side" or this or that issue.

    Personally, I have learned more about sedevacantism from the non-sedes here than from the sedes themselves. The discussions I have had here have helped me gain a more clear understanding of how complex the situation really is.

    Please ignore all that I have written regarding sedevacantism.


    Offline curiouscatholic23

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 388
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #5 on: September 18, 2011, 04:49:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I wasn't trying to bash cath info.........I just want more online resources. These are the four resources I check daily:

    -Cathinfo

    -MHFM

    -Tradition In Action

    -Hutton Gibson.com

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31182
    • Reputation: +27095/-494
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #6 on: September 18, 2011, 05:07:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: curiouscatholic23
    I wasn't trying to bash cath info.........I just want more online resources. These are the four resources I check daily:

    -Cathinfo

    -MHFM

    -Tradition In Action

    -Hutton Gibson.com


    I realize you weren't trying to bash CathInfo -- I was just letting you know that you're not alone, and that many others have wondered the same thing. And a bit of the "why".
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31182
    • Reputation: +27095/-494
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #7 on: September 18, 2011, 05:20:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Responding to Hobbledehoy's post --

    I guess it depends on whether or not you consider that "The Chair of Peter is currently empty" is a new dogma added to the Deposit of Faith that a Catholic must believe.

    In other words -- it's important to find other Catholics to converse with, yes. To discuss important topics, make friendships, and all that. We can't hang around nothing but pagans and protestants 24/7.

    BUT...

    Who would claim that "I have nothing to learn from any traditional Catholics who fail to realize that the Chair of Peter is empty."

    That seems rash and proud to me.

    The fact of the matter is, there are Catholics who have the Faith on both sides of the pope issue. So why separate them as you'd separate the sheep from the goats?

    I, for one, have learned plenty from my sedevacantist brethren on the other side of the aisle. I would be foolish to exclude them from my social circle.

    Matthew
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline Darcy

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 481
    • Reputation: +113/-0
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #8 on: September 18, 2011, 05:57:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #9 on: September 18, 2011, 08:26:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks, Darcy. I'll be sure to read there from to time. Who owns that forum?
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5768
    • Reputation: +4621/-480
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #10 on: September 19, 2011, 06:45:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Bellarmine Forums are reopening, September 19, 2011.

    Please read or re-read the Policy of the Bellarmine Forums, the Rules for Discussion & Controversy, and the thread entitled Joining the Bellarmine Forums.

    And welcome back.

    John Lane.

    http://www.strobertbellarmine.net/forums/index.php


    Offline Aeternitus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 11
    • Reputation: +18/-0
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #11 on: September 19, 2011, 07:05:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: TKGS
    The Bellarmine Forums are reopening, September 19, 2011.


    Excellent news!  Thanks for letting us know.  

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #12 on: September 19, 2011, 09:14:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yeah, thanks for letting us know TKGS. I just might sign up one day...
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Roman Catholic

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2679
    • Reputation: +397/-0
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #13 on: September 19, 2011, 11:57:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    Thanks, Darcy. I'll be sure to read there from to time. Who owns that forum?


    Eamon is the mod there. It is all about anti-SGG etc. You know the usual -- lots of speculation, innuendo, outright lies and other sinful content.

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    sedevacantist message boards???
    « Reply #14 on: September 19, 2011, 12:46:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That's not a discussion board, it's a John Lane monopoly where you either toe the John Lane line or won't last long.  

    I learned a lot reading the forum but would have no inclination to post there.    
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.