http://www.theamericanconservative.com/the-heretic-at-heritage/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-heretic-at-heritage

The Heretic at Heritage

By Patrick Buchanan

Jason Richwine, the young conservative scholar who co-authored the Heritage Foundation report on the long-term costs of the amnesty bill backed by the “Gang of Eight,” is gone from Heritage.

He was purged after the Washington Post unearthed his doctoral dissertation at the JFK School of Government.

Richwine’s thesis:

IQ tests fairly measure mental ability. The average IQ of immigrants is well below that of white Americans. This difference in IQ is likely to persist through several generations.

And the potential consequences of this?

“A lack of socioeconomic assimilation among low IQ immigrant groups, more underclass behavior, less social trust and an increase in the proportion of unskilled workers in the American labor market.”

Richwine defended his 166-page thesis before Harvard’s George Borjas, Richard Zeckhauser and Christopher Jencks, who once edited The New Republic. But while his thesis was acceptable at Harvard—it earned Richwine a Ph.D.—it has scandalized the Potomac priesthood.

Our elites appear unanimous: Richwine’s view that intelligence is not equally distributed among ethnic and racial groups, and is partly inherited, is rankest heresy. Yet no one seems to want to prove him wrong.

Consider Richwine’s contention that differences in mental ability exist and seem to persist among racial and ethnic groups.

In the Wall Street Journal last month, Warren Kozak noted that 28,000 students in America’s citadel of diversity, New York City, took the eighth-grade exam to enter Stuyvesant, the Bronx School of Science and Brooklyn Tech, the city’s most elite high schools. Students are admitted solely on their entrance test scores.

Of the 830 students who will be entering Stuyvesant as freshmen this fall, 1 percent are black, 3 percent are Hispanic, 21 percent are white—and 75 percent are Asian.

Now, blacks and Hispanics far outnumber Asians in New York. But at Stuyvesant, Asians will outnumber blacks and Hispanics together 19-to-1.

Is this the result of racially biased tests at Stuyvesant?

At Berkeley, crown Jєωel of the California university system, Hispanics, 40 percent of California’s population and an even larger share of California’s young, are 12 percent of the freshman class. Asians, outnumbered almost 3-to-1 by Hispanics in California, have almost four times as many slots as Hispanics in the freshman class.

Another example of racial bias?

The 2009 Programme for International Student Assessment, PISA, which measures the academic ability of 15-year-olds worldwide, found the U.S.A. falling to 17th in reading, 23rd in science, 31st in math.

Yet, Spain aside, not one Hispanic nation, from which a plurality of our immigrants come, was among the top 40 in reading, science or math.

But these folks are going to come here and make us No. 1 again?

Is there greater “underclass behavior” among Hispanics?

The crime rate among Hispanics is about three times that of white Americans, while the Asian crime rate is about a third that of whites.

Among white folks, the recent illegitimacy rate was 28 percent; among Hispanics, 53 percent. According to one study a few years back, Hispanics were 19 times as likely as whites to join gangs.

What about Richwine’s point regarding “social trust”?

Six years ago, in “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the 21st Century,” Robert Putnam, author of “Bowling Alone,” wrote that after 30,000 interviews he found that ethnic and racial diversity can be devastating to communities and destructive of community values.

In racially mixed communities, Putnam wrote, not only do people not trust strangers, they do not even trust their own kind.

“People living in ethnically diverse settings appear to ’hunker down,’ that is, to pull in like a turtle … (to) withdraw even from close friends, to expect the worst from their community and its leaders, to volunteer less, give less to charity and work on community projects less often, to register to vote less, to agitate for social reform more but have less faith they can actually make a difference, and to huddle unhappily in front of the television.”

With the immigration bill granting amnesty to 12 million illegals, an open door to their dependents and a million new immigrants each year, almost all from the Third World, America in 2040 is going to look like Los Angeles today. Yet, it was in L.A. that Putnam found social capital at its most depleted and exhausted.

If Richwine is right, America in 2040 will be a country with whites and Asians dominating the professions, and 100 million Hispanics concentrated in semiskilled work and manual labor.

The issues Richwine raises go to the question of whether we shall survive as one nation and one people.

If our huge bloc of Hispanics, already America’s largest minority at 53 million, is fed by constant new immigration, but fails for a couple of generations to reach the middle-class status that Irish, Germans, Jєωs, Italians and Poles attained after two generations, what becomes of our “indivisible” nation?

Rather than face this question, better to purge and silence the Harvard extremist who dared to raise it.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of “ѕυιcιdє of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?” Copyright 2012 Creators.com.

This portion struck home to me:

In racially mixed communities, Putnam wrote, not only do people not trust strangers, they do not even trust their own kind.

“People living in ethnically diverse settings appear to ’hunker down,’ that is, to pull in like a turtle … (to) withdraw even from close friends, to expect the worst from their community and its leaders, to volunteer less, give less to charity and work on community projects less often, to register to vote less, to agitate for social reform more but have less faith they can actually make a difference, and to huddle unhappily in front of the television.”

With the immigration bill granting amnesty to 12 million illegals, an open door to their dependents and a million new immigrants each year, almost all from the Third World, America in 2040 is going to look like Los Angeles today. Yet, it was in L.A. that Putnam found social capital at its most depleted and exhausted.

Two years ago in Los Angeles, I attempted to help several Hispanic boys who
were close to becoming involved with gangs.  That is, their parents were
attempting to intervene as if the boys had not yet become involved with
gangs, but I had to wonder:  it seems the boys were already getting involved
but had perhaps lied to their parents.  I came to that conclusion because I
was there to help them with English and Math study skills, but the boys would
not accept my help.  Not being an expert in learning disabilities, I was not
able to assess them, but it seemed to me that they had some kind of
impediment to being able to get through particular fundamental lessons
without "hitting the wall" which means reaching a point of incapacity to make
any more progress.  

There was something going on in their heads and I could not figure it out,
but they were unwilling to allow me to help them get to the bottom of their
problems.  They rebelled in various ways, one would just sit there and not
respond to my questions or offers to show him how to work with words or
numbers.  When I gave him his assessment test he fairly stared at the
page and made a few cursory marks on it as if to show that he had the
chance and decided to pass it up.  Another appeared to pay attention but
continued to respond in the same manner as before the lessons that I had
given him, telling me that even though we had worked on these things
together he remembered nothing of what we had done.  Another simply
stopped showing up -- I had been going to his home for the lessons but
on my final visit (the last time I went because his absence would be the
"last straw" that would prevent me from returning in the future) about
a half hour before my appointed arrival his sister said that he had gone
out the back door and had disappeared so that none of his family knew
where he was, and only after I had waited for an hour and then left, did
he return home, with the explanation that he had been with "some friends."

I got the impression that these boys were getting a sense of 'belonging'
from their gangs, where they did not have to demonstrate any
improvement in their reading or mathematics skills.  Or, perhaps the
gangs were telling them that they must not cooperate with any attempts
at intervention to assist them to learn English or Math skills.  I am just
putting that together from clues but nobody was willing to explain it to
me -- there is a lot of secrecy around gang activity.  It seems to
me that the doctrine of these gangs is "you are acceptable as you are"
and a kind of pride of ignorance of basic skills of literacy and education.

If this was a consistent thing for me, and it was not uncommon for others
I knew at the time, it would be understandable if volunteers would
eventually stop volunteering in community projects or giving to charity.

This reminds me of the prophesy that in the end times charity would grow
cold ("12And because iniquity hath abounded, the charity of many shall
grow cold" Mt. xxiv. 12).