The blasphemers at Charlie Hebdo (they blasphemed Our Lord and Our Lady regularly) are not really to be mourned, but this attack does present the reality of a stark choice : In the future, will Frenchmen allow Mohammedans to govern them through violence, or will Frenchmen govern Mohammedan interlopers, restrict or ban their immigration, and deport those already in France ? It's a thought that is certain to percolate in French minds for some time. I imagine Paris is humming right now with violent anti-Mohammedan rhetoric, at least amongst a certain large portion of the population. I can only imagine the reaction in the South and West.
Le Pen and Sarkozy will now do even better at the next presidential elections. The Socialists have shown that they are basically impotent. The real struggle, now, will be in keeping Sarkozy away from the Élysées palace. I am no fan of Le Pen, but if she were to win and were to move closer to Russia at the expense of NATO and the EU, we will perhaps have turned a corner towards recovery in the West, as far as I can tell. The post-war global order needs to be shaken up so that Frenchmen and others can stand up for themselves and secure a future for our countries. It is currently the biggest hindrance to effective thought and action against the very real problems posed by globalisation.
I do not suggest that Putin and a Eurasian Union are somehow to lead us to the salvation of the remnants of Christendom. I only suggest that the countries of Europe, currently in cultural and economic vassalage to the Anglo-American establishment, would do well to break away and consider its options. Right now, its position of little brother in a fraternity founded on the interest of the senior partner is leading to its death. Moving closer to the East is one way that the break away could be effected. After that, the hard work of rebuilding has a chance; but one cannot build anything when his arms are tied behind his back.