Author Topic: Feminists Losing Bipartisan Support (Read 1246 times)

Busillis · « **Reply #5 on:** March 16, 2012, 11:57:18 AM »

I guess I dislike how female feminists are viewed as change agents and leaders, when in reality they are just taking orders from men. Male feminists are the ones who exercise the real power. Female feminists are submissive and operate as the faces, and not the brains, of the movement.

It kind of reminds me of the Civil Rights Movement. The official interpretation is that the Civil Rights Movement was controlled by black Americans. But it was more like a Jєωιѕн movement than a black movement. I think Jews were the principle funders of the movement and most of the intellectual firepower and coordination came from Jews, and not blacks. If I was living in the 1960s and wanted to destroy that movement I would have attacked Jews, and not blacks.

I think that we cater to feminist delusion when we treat female feminists as if they are the leaders of feminism. I think they like this, because it plays into their fantasy of being independent of male influence and direction. But it's just a fantasy. They're as submissive to men as any other women. But they're submissive to men who don't serve Christ. That's the difference.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #6 on:** March 16, 2012, 12:05:27 PM »

Quote from: Busillis

I guess I dislike how female feminists are viewed as change agents and leaders, when in reality they are just taking orders from men. Male feminists are the ones who exercise the real power. Female feminists are submissive and operate as the faces, and not the brains, of the movement.

It kind of reminds me of the Civil Rights Movement. The official interpretation is that the Civil Rights Movement was controlled by black Americans. But it was more like a Jєωιѕн movement than a black movement. I think Jews were the principle funders of the movement and most of the intellectual firepower and coordination came from Jews, and not blacks. If I was living in the 1960s and wanted to destroy that movement I would have attacked Jews, and not blacks.

I think that we cater to feminist delusion when we treat female feminists as if they are the leaders of feminism. I think they like this, because it plays into their fantasy of being independent of male influence and direction. But it's just a fantasy. They're as submissive to men as any other women. But they're submissive to men who don't serve Christ. That's the difference.

Women have a lot of influence. This has always been the case. Part of the problem today is that men still see themselves as representing men and women, impartially, while women act almost exclusively in the interests of women.

So on juries, in voting, law, etc, things keep shifting, sometimes even unconsciously.

I agree that the there is a conspiratorial force that is guiding these changes.

The main reason men can't seem to do anything about ever intensifying encroachments on their position in society is that they're afraid to confront women. Afraid to criticize them. The propagandists have encouraged women to act out from an early age, when a few anti-feminist men speak out against them they are shouted down and vilified. Men have been trained to give way to women. That's why the progress of social revolution has been inexorable.

So shifting responsibility for feminism away from women is a mistake. Just as it's a mistake to shift responsibility from the blacks for their overwhelming, racially motivated support for Obama.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #7 on:** March 16, 2012, 12:07:51 PM »

I mean, you don't think Obama's his own man, do you? He's working for whites and Jews.

And yet he has associated with anti-white extremists for much of his life.

It's the white fear of confronting black aggression, the desire of many whites to show that society is not "racist" - that accounts for Obama's election.

Busillis · « **Reply #8 on:** March 16, 2012, 01:13:52 PM »

I don't want to shift responsibility. I don't disagree with any of that. But if you have 100 antagonists, and all those antagonists share the same leader, then you ignore those unimportant people and go after the leader. Once their leader is gone the followers fall like a house of cards. They have no direction. I just see Jews as the maestros of disorder, moving about sinning gentiles like chess pieces.

I think until Catholics are able to pass laws that force Jews back into segregated zones and make it illegal for them to attain positions of influence, every corrosive tendency in gentiles will continue to flourish. A Catholic confessional state is the only real good answer to Judaism, and its cancerous offshoots. The Jews shouldn't have any power. And feminism would cease to exist without its benefactor.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #9 on:** March 16, 2012, 01:25:07 PM »

Quote from: Busillis

I don't want to shift responsibility. I don't disagree with any of that. But if you have 100 antagonists, and all those antagonists share the same leader, then you ignore those unimportant people and go after the leader.

If you get rid of the leader and they still act the same way you're going to have the same problems. The only way to get them to stop acting the way they're acting is to stand up to them.

Quote

Once their leader is gone the followers fall like a house of cards. They have no direction. I just see Jews as the maestros of disorder, moving about sinning gentiles like chess pieces.

They have no direction, that's true, but feminism is chaos. Women being encouraged to follow unbridled appetites at the expense of men and children.

Quote

I think until Catholics are able to pass laws that force Jews back into segregated zones and make it illegal for them to attain positions of influence, every corrosive tendency in gentiles will continue to flourish. A Catholic confessional state is the only real good answer to Judaism, and its cancerous offshoots. The Jews shouldn't have any power. And feminism would cease to exist without its benefactor.

Well, we have to fight on all fronts. You know, if defeating an enemy only involved taking out the enemy leadership all wars would be fought that way.