Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Raoul76s Reparation Thread  (Read 3609 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Raoul76

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4803
  • Reputation: +2007/-6
  • Gender: Male
Raoul76s Reparation Thread
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2011, 06:35:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fine, Caminus, I apologize for saying you have bad will.  I didn't think that was judging intentions, I thought that I could judge bad will through someone's actions.  Perhaps that was wrong.

    I will just say your actions and words are often hateful, which you have now revealed to everyone -- or at least they're becoming more aware -- and leave it at that.  
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.


    Offline Sigismund

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5386
    • Reputation: +3121/-44
    • Gender: Male
    Raoul76s Reparation Thread
    « Reply #16 on: December 21, 2011, 10:02:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Telesphorus
    Quote from: Sigismund
    Quote from: GertrudetheGreat
    May God bless you, Raoul.  Manly and virtuous.


    Oh come on now!  Down thumbing a post like  this is just childish.


    Is it?

    I don't like it when SSPX sycophants crow over the self-abasement of critics.

    Bishop Fellay has demonstrated his untrustworthiness.

    I'm rather sure that if someone in the SSPX were to act the way Raoul is acting, and thereby incur the displeasure of his superiors, that he would be criticized for behaving in a cringing and unmanly manner.


    Well, if you think a sincere acknowledgement of self-diagnosed wrong and an equally sincere apology is cringing and unmanly, all I can say is that I am sorry you feel that way.  Perhaps this is also cringing and unmanly.
    Stir up within Thy Church, we beseech Thee, O Lord, the Spirit with which blessed Josaphat, Thy Martyr and Bishop, was filled, when he laid down his life for his sheep: so that, through his intercession, we too may be moved and strengthen by the same Spir


    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Raoul76s Reparation Thread
    « Reply #17 on: December 21, 2011, 10:10:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Sigismund
    Quote from: Telesphorus
    Quote from: Sigismund
    Quote from: GertrudetheGreat
    May God bless you, Raoul.  Manly and virtuous.


    Oh come on now!  Down thumbing a post like  this is just childish.


    Is it?

    I don't like it when SSPX sycophants crow over the self-abasement of critics.

    Bishop Fellay has demonstrated his untrustworthiness.

    I'm rather sure that if someone in the SSPX were to act the way Raoul is acting, and thereby incur the displeasure of his superiors, that he would be criticized for behaving in a cringing and unmanly manner.


    Well, if you think a sincere acknowledgement of self-diagnosed wrong and an equally sincere apology is cringing and unmanly, all I can say is that I am sorry you feel that way.  Perhaps this is also cringing and unmanly.


    I wasn't criticizing Raoul's post, I was criticizing the effusive praise of it.


    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Raoul76s Reparation Thread
    « Reply #18 on: December 21, 2011, 10:14:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • People who seek to right wrongs they have done aren't fishing for praise.

    There's no need for people here to be ceaselessly patting each other on that back.

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Raoul76s Reparation Thread
    « Reply #19 on: December 22, 2011, 10:27:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I was only "praising" Raoul for having the guts to make a new reparation thread after his original one got hijacked.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.


    Offline Catholic Samurai

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2821
    • Reputation: +744/-14
    • Gender: Male
    Raoul76s Reparation Thread
    « Reply #20 on: December 22, 2011, 10:41:28 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    I was only "praising" Raoul for having the guts to make a new reparation thread after his original one got hijacked.


    I recall he said last time that it was required of him by his confessor, so maybe it would be more accurate to say that he was  prodded to make a new thread?  :wink:
    "Louvada Siesa O' Sanctisimo Sacramento!"~warcry of the Amakusa/Shimabara rebels

    "We must risk something for God!"~Hernan Cortes


    TEJANO AND PROUD!

    Offline Sigismund

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5386
    • Reputation: +3121/-44
    • Gender: Male
    Raoul76s Reparation Thread
    « Reply #21 on: December 22, 2011, 09:53:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Telesphorus
    Quote from: Sigismund
    Quote from: Telesphorus
    Quote from: Sigismund
    Quote from: GertrudetheGreat
    May God bless you, Raoul.  Manly and virtuous.


    Oh come on now!  Down thumbing a post like  this is just childish.


    Is it?

    I don't like it when SSPX sycophants crow over the self-abasement of critics.

    Bishop Fellay has demonstrated his untrustworthiness.

    I'm rather sure that if someone in the SSPX were to act the way Raoul is acting, and thereby incur the displeasure of his superiors, that he would be criticized for behaving in a cringing and unmanly manner.


    Well, if you think a sincere acknowledgement of self-diagnosed wrong and an equally sincere apology is cringing and unmanly, all I can say is that I am sorry you feel that way.  Perhaps this is also cringing and unmanly.


    I wasn't criticizing Raoul's post, I was criticizing the effusive praise of it.



    Okay.  Fair enough
    Stir up within Thy Church, we beseech Thee, O Lord, the Spirit with which blessed Josaphat, Thy Martyr and Bishop, was filled, when he laid down his life for his sheep: so that, through his intercession, we too may be moved and strengthen by the same Spir

    Offline Sigismund

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5386
    • Reputation: +3121/-44
    • Gender: Male
    Raoul76s Reparation Thread
    « Reply #22 on: December 22, 2011, 09:55:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Telesphorus
    People who seek to right wrongs they have done aren't fishing for praise.

    There's no need for people here to be ceaselessly patting each other on that back.


    It seems to me that there is a lot more back stabbing on this forum than back patting.  
    Stir up within Thy Church, we beseech Thee, O Lord, the Spirit with which blessed Josaphat, Thy Martyr and Bishop, was filled, when he laid down his life for his sheep: so that, through his intercession, we too may be moved and strengthen by the same Spir


    Offline Canute

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 201
    • Reputation: +143/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Raoul76s Reparation Thread
    « Reply #23 on: December 23, 2011, 09:10:53 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Telesphorus
    People who seek to right wrongs they have done aren't fishing for praise.

    There's no need for people here to be ceaselessly patting each other on that back.

    I think the reason why people on this forum react so positively to someone who publicly apologizes is that many of the arguments have been so long and so bitter. A change of heart and a retraction or apology comes as an encouraging surprise.

    Merry Christmas!

    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Raoul76s Reparation Thread
    « Reply #24 on: December 23, 2011, 01:32:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Canute
    Quote from: Telesphorus
    People who seek to right wrongs they have done aren't fishing for praise.

    There's no need for people here to be ceaselessly patting each other on that back.

    I think the reason why people on this forum react so positively to someone who publicly apologizes is that many of the arguments have been so long and so bitter. A change of heart and a retraction or apology comes as an encouraging surprise.

    Merry Christmas!


    I was only taking issue with the gloater who's new here.

    Offline St Jude Thaddeus

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 857
    • Reputation: +185/-24
    • Gender: Male
    Raoul76s Reparation Thread
    « Reply #25 on: December 28, 2011, 12:15:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Canute
    Quote from: Telesphorus
    People who seek to right wrongs they have done aren't fishing for praise.

    There's no need for people here to be ceaselessly patting each other on that back.

    I think the reason why people on this forum react so positively to someone who publicly apologizes is that many of the arguments have been so long and so bitter. A change of heart and a retraction or apology comes as an encouraging surprise.

    Merry Christmas!


     :applause:

    You're right, Canute. One of the worst things about the post-conciliar crisis is that we no longer trust any (or very few) living Church authorities. In fact, anybody from the last one hundred years or so is suspect. This leads us to believe the worst about everyone around us, especially anyone who disagrees with our own position.

    I would also like to apologize for anyone I have offended here, especially the poster "pax". I don't agree with him, but I need to find a better way to defend my own arguments than resulting to insults.
    St. Jude, who, disregarding the threats of the impious, courageously preached the doctrine of Christ,
    pray for us.


    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Raoul76s Reparation Thread
    « Reply #26 on: February 07, 2012, 12:22:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • ADDITION:  

    I can't remember if I apologized in the other thread that was locked or not, but I will apologize for generally being suspicious or thinking that people like Pius XII or Abp. Lefebvre were deliberate conspirators.  I know I confessed this but can't remember if I made a general reparation.  I'm not going to go through all my errors, nor can I remember them, but it all comes down to suspicion without enough evidence.  I mistrusted pretty much everyone at one time so I'd be here all day if I mentioned all my mistakes.
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Raoul76s Reparation Thread
    « Reply #27 on: April 02, 2012, 09:50:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Another retraction:  I believe  I once suggested the CMRI nuns who left to go back to the Novus Ordo were witches, which I apologize for.  S2Srea mentioned EWTN today, and I remembered when they went on Life on the Rock and I got outraged.
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.