Your post was pointless [.]Not
at all: You simply failed
it. I try to limit the time I spend in on-line forums, so I'm not going to write both
a posting, and an abstract
readers. This ain't a refereed technical forum. But it also ain't a twit
forum, so the irony that your sentence was literally "pointless
" does reflect on you (please note grammatical correction in quote).
My posting raised the issue of if it's "closed minded", "small minded", and "full of himself" for a Protestant
to "REFUSE to listen to anything we Catholics have to say", then what should readers think if (for purposes of discussion) we turn the tables? Is it ever
acceptable for a Catholic
to "REFUSE to listen to anything [those Protestants] have to say"? Or in your opinion, would such Catholics be "closed minded", "small minded", and "full of [them]sel[ves]"?
hackneyed saying it is but: can't say anything nice maybe you should[sic] say anything at all.
be "shouldn't say anything
at all". But when you're a CathInfo noob
of only 3 weeks'
standing[†], so determined to inflate your postings-count on CathInfo by cranking them out at the rate of 7 per day
, maybe it's too much for readers to expect that you could devote the wee bit of extra time needed to correctly word
your own rebukes or insults?
Note †: July 10
, 2017 per <https://www.cathinfo.com/profile/graceseeker/