Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X  (Read 1661 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LordPhan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1171
  • Reputation: +826/-1
  • Gender: Male

Quote
Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X


7-10-2011  






On October 7, 2011, a meeting of all those in charge of the Society of St Pius X was held in Albano, Italy, during which the Superior General, H. E. Bishop Bernard Fellay, presented the content of the Doctrinal Preamble, handed over to him by Cardinal William Levada, Prefect of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, at the Vatican, during last September 14 meeting.
 
During this day, the twenty-eight persons in charge of the Society of St Pius X present at the meeting – seminary rectors, district superiors from all over the world – manifested a profound unity in their will to maintain the Faith in its integrity and its fullness, faithful to the lesson which Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre left them, according to St Paul’s “Tradidi quod et accepi – I have handed over what I myself have received” (I Cor 15:3).
 
Following this work meeting, the study of the Doctrinal Preamble – of which the content still remains confidential – will be pursued and further analysed at the level of the General Counsel of the Society of St Pius X, by the Superior General and his two Assistants, Frs. Niklaus Pfluger and Alain Nely, enabling them to present an answer to the Roman proposals in a reasonable time.


Offline Telesphorus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12713
  • Reputation: +22/-13
  • Gender: Male
Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2011, 06:46:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • We were never negotiating, and it's none of your business what's being discussed!


    Offline RomanKansan

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 45
    • Reputation: +189/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
    « Reply #2 on: October 07, 2011, 08:33:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Am I the only one who has now lost patience with this lunacy?
    I am not talking about the substance of the thing. Whether you think Bishop Fellay is trying to somehow betray the Society or think he is working conscientiously to restore Tradition in the Church, the process is absolutely insane at this point.
    Read that press release. The leadership has had the preamble for almost a month now, a preamble based on discussions which have been dragging on for years. After meeting all day, nothing was even attempted to be decided. The same three people who have already had the docuмent for almost a month are only now going to begin analyzing it for more months (or will it be years!?). Forget about what’s in the preamble for a minute, how long is it that it takes highly educated men years to determine if its Catholic or not? Is it 8,000 pages? If the SSPX leadership had been in charge of responding to Luther’s writings the Council of Trent still wouldn’t have started yet.

    Offline LordPhan

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1171
    • Reputation: +826/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
    « Reply #3 on: October 07, 2011, 08:41:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Council of Trent took DECADES to finish. Multiple Pope's... I can get the exact number of years if you need it.

    The District Superiors and The Bishops' met today, and they told Felley what the thought of it.

    Now they are figuring out how to word a response to Rome. This is why Lay should not worry about it, the Church is not a democracy, nor do we want Democracy.

    I would rather they took the time to get it right, then be rash and make a mistake. Whether it happens soon or later, or whether we learn of what it says sooner or later matters not to any of us in the practicle matter. Only the end result matters.

    Offline LordPhan

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1171
    • Reputation: +826/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
    « Reply #4 on: October 07, 2011, 08:42:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • urg, I meant to and then did thumb down Tele's post, but I also accidently thumbed down yours. That was an accident, feel free to thumb down mine.


    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
    « Reply #5 on: October 07, 2011, 09:00:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LordPhan
    the Church is not a democracy, nor do we want Democracy.


    Of course it isn't.  The claimed Pope said the SSPX does not exercise legitimate ministry in the Catholic Church.  So why do you support them?  Unless you're making your own decision based on adherence to Catholic doctrine.  The SSPX bishops have no duly constituted authority.  So if you support them it's of your own will, by your own interpretation of the facts.  Then they tell you "it's none of your business" what they're negotiating?  That's ridiculous.

    Offline ManofGosh

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 56
    • Reputation: +42/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
    « Reply #6 on: October 07, 2011, 09:05:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I will say though, I like what they said in the second paragraph.


    "During this day, the twenty-eight persons in charge of the Society of St Pius X present at the meeting – seminary rectors, district superiors from all over the world – manifested a profound unity in their will to maintain the Faith in its integrity and its fullness, faithful to the lesson which Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre left them, according to St Paul’s “Tradidi quod et accepi – I have handed over what I myself have received” (I Cor 15:3)."
    Our Lady of The Rosary Library  (olrl. org)

    Offline LordPhan

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1171
    • Reputation: +826/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
    « Reply #7 on: October 07, 2011, 09:09:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Telesphorus
    Quote from: LordPhan
    the Church is not a democracy, nor do we want Democracy.


    Of course it isn't.  The claimed Pope said the SSPX does not exercise legitimate ministry in the Catholic Church.  So why do you support them?  Unless you're making your own decision based on adherence to Catholic doctrine.  The SSPX bishops have no duly constituted authority.  So if you support them it's of your own will, by your own interpretation of the facts.  Then they tell you "it's none of your business" what they're negotiating?  That's ridiculous.


    I am starting to believe you are a mason, you keep saying negotiation when there was not and has not been any negotiation. What part of this don't you grasp?

    The rest of your post indicates a lack of comprehension regarding church law and church doctrine. The Spirit of the Law always prevails over the letter and a bad law is no law at all.

    Become educated then come back, everything you say about the SSPX is a lie formented in your mind due to the fact you couldn't marry some girl. And seeing that you are almost always saying something without fact, on the basis of your emotions, that could very well be why.



    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
    « Reply #8 on: October 07, 2011, 09:18:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Who gave the SSPX bishops jurisdiction over you?

    Didn't you start following them because of your own judgment of what Catholic teaching is, that they adhere to Catholic teaching, and not because of any duly constituted authority?

    So how can you possibly argue that points of doctrine they are discussing are not your business?

    And yes, it is evident they are negotiating - otherwise there's no reason for secrecy.  If someone is Catholic and they believe a teaching of the Church they don't hide under a bushel basket.  It's only if they might or might not believe it that they hide it.

    Offline ManofGosh

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 56
    • Reputation: +42/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
    « Reply #9 on: October 07, 2011, 10:14:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Telesphorus
    Who gave the SSPX bishops jurisdiction over you?

    Didn't you start following them because of your own judgment of what Catholic teaching is, that they adhere to Catholic teaching, and not because of any duly constituted authority?

    So how can you possibly argue that points of doctrine they are discussing are not your business?

    And yes, it is evident they are negotiating - otherwise there's no reason for secrecy.  If someone is Catholic and they believe a teaching of the Church they don't hide under a bushel basket.  It's only if they might or might not believe it that they hide it.


     I agree that if it is Catholic then it is universal. Every soul in the whole church should profess it. If it is universal and everybody should profess it, then what is there to hide. How do you convert people without professing what you believe. This bothers me very much, Our Lord did not keep his Gospel to himself. Why is it then something that should be very Catholic is being kept secret? I don't blame the SSPX, for this was requested by the Vatican.

     I have another problem with the Vatican too. Below I copy and pasted the Anglican Constitution to be received into the Catholic church. It also institutes the Ordinariate for them. Again you would think something like this is universal, but reading it and I can tell you if I were a superior of the SSPX I would not except it in that form. Then this brings up another question. If the SSPX is getting something different, then why? Why would every group rejoining the church would get their own personal deal and not something that is Catholic (universal)? All these things brings red flags up, which I am sure the SSPX see too. I think the modernist think if they word things the right way, they can justify anybody or any group. It is the same tricks used in VatII. Until the Vatican clearly only professes one Faith then I find it Necessary to place myself in the jurisdiction of the SSPX. Where I find the most stable conditions for me and my family.






    BENEDICT XVI

    APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTION ANGLICANORUM COETIBUS

    PROVIDING FOR PERSONAL ORDINARIATES FOR ANGLICANS
    ENTERING INTO FULL COMMUNION
    WITH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH



    In recent times the Holy Spirit has moved groups of Anglicans to petition repeatedly and insistently to be received into full Catholic communion individually as well as corporately. The Apostolic See has responded favourably to such petitions. Indeed, the successor of Peter, mandated by the Lord Jesus to guarantee the unity of the episcopate and to preside over and safeguard the universal communion of all the Churches,[1] could not fail to make available the means necessary to bring this holy desire to realization.

    The Church, a people gathered into the unity of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit,[2] was instituted by our Lord Jesus Christ, as “a sacrament – a sign and instrument, that is, of communion with God and of unity among all people.”[3] Every division among the baptized in Jesus Christ wounds that which the Church is and that for which the Church exists; in fact, “such division openly contradicts the will of Christ, scandalizes the world, and damages that most holy cause, the preaching the Gospel to every creature.”[4] Precisely for this reason, before shedding his blood for the salvation of the world, the Lord Jesus prayed to the Father for the unity of his disciples.[5]

    It is the Holy Spirit, the principle of unity, which establishes the Church as a communion.[6] He is the principle of the unity of the faithful in the teaching of the Apostles, in the breaking of the bread and in prayer.[7] The Church, however, analogous to the mystery of the Incarnate Word, is not only an invisible spiritual communion, but is also visible;[8] in fact, “the society structured with hierarchical organs and the Mystical Body of Christ, the visible society and the spiritual community, the earthly Church and the Church endowed with heavenly riches, are not to be thought of as two realities. On the contrary, they form one complex reality formed from a two-fold element, human and divine.”[9] The communion of the baptized in the teaching of the Apostles and in the breaking of the eucharistic bread is visibly manifested in the bonds of the profession of the faith in its entirety, of the celebration of all of the sacraments instituted by Christ, and of the governance of the College of Bishops united with its head, the Roman Pontiff.[10]

    This single Church of Christ, which we profess in the Creed as one, holy, catholic and apostolic “subsists in the Catholic Church, which is governed by the successor of Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him. Nevertheless, many elements of sanctification and of truth are found outside her visible confines. Since these are gifts properly belonging to the Church of Christ, they are forces impelling towards Catholic unity.”[11]

    In the light of these ecclesiological principles, this Apostolic Constitution provides the general normative structure for regulating the institution and life of Personal Ordinariates for those Anglican faithful who desire to enter into the full communion of the Catholic Church in a corporate manner. This Constitution is completed by Complementary Norms issued by the Apostolic See.

    I. §1 Personal Ordinariates for Anglicans entering into full communion with the Catholic Church are erected by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith within the confines of the territorial boundaries of a particular Conference of Bishops in consultation with that same Conference.

    §2 Within the territory of a particular Conference of Bishops, one or more Ordinariates may be erected as needed.

    §3 Each Ordinariate possesses public juridic personality by the law itself (ipso iure); it is juridically comparable to a diocese.[12]

    §4 The Ordinariate is composed of lay faithful, clerics and members of Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, originally belonging to the Anglican Communion and now in full communion with the Catholic Church, or those who receive the Sacraments of Initiation within the jurisdiction of the Ordinariate.

    §5 The Catechism of the Catholic Church is the authoritative expression of the Catholic faith professed by members of the Ordinariate.

    II. The Personal Ordinariate is governed according to the norms of universal law and the present Apostolic Constitution and is subject to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and the other Dicasteries of the Roman Curia in accordance with their competencies. It is also governed by the Complementary Norms as well as any other specific Norms given for each Ordinariate.

    III. Without excluding liturgical celebrations according to the Roman Rite, the Ordinariate has the faculty to celebrate the Holy Eucharist and the other Sacraments, the Liturgy of the Hours and other liturgical celebrations according to the liturgical books proper to the Anglican tradition, which have been approved by the Holy See, so as to maintain the liturgical, spiritual and pastoral traditions of the Anglican Communion within the Catholic Church, as a precious gift nourishing the faith of the members of the Ordinariate and as a treasure to be shared.

    IV. A Personal Ordinariate is entrusted to the pastoral care of an Ordinary appointed by the Roman Pontiff.

    V. The power (potestas) of the Ordinary is:

    a. ordinary: connected by the law itself to the office entrusted to him by the Roman Pontiff, for both the internal forum and external forum;

    b. vicarious: exercised in the name of the Roman Pontiff;

    c. personal: exercised over all who belong to the Ordinariate;

    This power is to be exercised jointly with that of the local Diocesan Bishop, in those cases provided for in the Complementary Norms.

    VI. § 1. Those who ministered as Anglican deacons, priests, or bishops, and who fulfil the requisites established by canon law[13] and are not impeded by irregularities or other impediments[14] may be accepted by the Ordinary as candidates for Holy Orders in the Catholic Church. In the case of married ministers, the norms established in the Encyclical Letter of Pope Paul VI Sacerdotalis coelibatus, n. 42[15] and in the Statement In June[16] are to be observed. Unmarried ministers must submit to the norm of clerical celibacy of CIC can. 277, §1.

    § 2. The Ordinary, in full observance of the discipline of celibate clergy in the Latin Church, as a rule (pro regula) will admit only celibate men to the order of presbyter. He may also petition the Roman Pontiff, as a derogation from can. 277, §1, for the admission of married men to the order of presbyter on a case by case basis, according to objective criteria approved by the Holy See.

    § 3. Incardination of clerics will be regulated according to the norms of canon law.

    § 4. Priests incardinated into an Ordinariate, who constitute the presbyterate of the Ordinariate, are also to cultivate bonds of unity with the presbyterate of the Diocese in which they exercise their ministry. They should promote common pastoral and charitable initiatives and activities, which can be the object of agreements between the Ordinary and the local Diocesan Bishop.

    § 5. Candidates for Holy Orders in an Ordinariate should be prepared alongside other seminarians, especially in the areas of doctrinal and pastoral formation. In order to address the particular needs of seminarians of the Ordinariate and formation in Anglican patrimony, the Ordinary may also establish seminary programs or houses of formation which would relate to existing Catholic faculties of theology.

    VII. The Ordinary, with the approval of the Holy See, can erect new Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, with the right to call their members to Holy Orders, according to the norms of canon law. Institutes of Consecrated Life originating in the Anglican Communion and entering into full communion with the Catholic Church may also be placed under his jurisdiction by mutual consent.

    VIII. § 1. The Ordinary, according to the norm of law, after having heard the opinion of the Diocesan Bishop of the place, may erect, with the consent of the Holy See, personal parishes for the faithful who belong to the Ordinariate.

    § 2. Pastors of the Ordinariate enjoy all the rights and are held to all the obligations established in the Code of Canon Law and, in cases established by the Complementary Norms, such rights and obligations are to be exercised in mutual pastoral assistance together with the pastors of the local Diocese where the personal parish of the Ordinariate has been established.

    IX. Both the lay faithful as well as members of Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, originally part of the Anglican Communion, who wish to enter the Personal Ordinariate, must manifest this desire in writing.

    X. § 1. The Ordinary is aided in his governance by a Governing Council with its own statutes approved by the Ordinary and confirmed by the Holy See.[17]

    § 2. The Governing Council, presided over by the Ordinary, is composed of at least six priests. It exercises the functions specified in the Code of Canon Law for the Presbyteral Council and the College of Consultors, as well as those areas specified in the Complementary Norms.

    § 3. The Ordinary is to establish a Finance Council according to the norms established by the Code of Canon Law which will exercise the duties specified therein.[18]

    § 4. In order to provide for the consultation of the faithful, a Pastoral Council is to be constituted in the Ordinariate.[19]

    XI. Every five years the Ordinary is required to come to Rome for an ad limina Apostolorum visit and present to the Roman Pontiff, through the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and in consultation with the Congregation for Bishops and the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, a report on the status of the Ordinariate.

    XII. For judicial cases, the competent tribunal is that of the Diocese in which one of the parties is domiciled, unless the Ordinariate has constituted its own tribunal, in which case the tribunal of second instance is the one designated by the Ordinariate and approved by the Holy See. In both cases, the different titles of competence established by the Code of Canon Law are to be taken into account.[20]

    XIII. The Decree establishing an Ordinariate will determine the location of the See and, if appropriate, the principal church.

    We desire that our dispositions and norms be valid and effective now and in the future, notwithstanding, should it be necessary, the Apostolic Constitutions and ordinances issued by our predecessors, or any other prescriptions, even those requiring special mention or derogation.

    Given in Rome, at St. Peter’s, on November 4, 2009, the Memorial of St. Charles Borromeo.


    BENEDICTUS PP. XVI

    [1] Cf. Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 23; Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Letter Communionis notio, 12; 13.

    [2] Cf. Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 4; Decree Unitatis redintegratio, 2.

    [3] Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 1.

    [4] Decree Unitatis redintegratio, 1.

    [5] Cf. Jn 17:20-21; Decree Unitatis redintegratio, 2.

    [6] Cf. Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 13.

    [7] Cf. ibid; Acts 2:42.

    [8] Cf. Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 8; Letter Communionis notio, 4.

    [9] Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 8.

    [10] Cf. CIC, can. 205; Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 13; 14; 21; 22; Decree Unitatis redintegratio, 2; 3; 4; 15; 20; Decree Christus Dominus, 4; Decree Ad gentes, 22.

    [11] Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 8.

    [12] Cf. John Paul II, Ap. Const. Spirituali militium curae, 21 April 1986, I § 1.

    [13] Cf. CIC, cann. 1026-1032.

    [14] Cf. CIC, cann. 1040-1049.

    [15] Cf. AAS 59 (1967) 674.

    [16] Cf. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Statement of 1 April 1981, in Enchiridion Vaticanum 7, 1213.

    [17] Cf. CIC, cann. 495-502.

    [18] Cf. CIC, cann. 492-494.

    [19] Cf. CIC, can. 511.

    [20] Cf. CIC, cann. 1410-1414 and 1673.

    http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/apost_constitutions/docuмents/hf_ben-xvi_apc_20091104_anglicanorum-coetibus_en.html
    Our Lady of The Rosary Library  (olrl. org)

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31183
    • Reputation: +27098/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
    « Reply #10 on: October 08, 2011, 12:54:27 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I agree with Telesphorus --

    If the SSPX is just carrying on the work of Archbishop Lefebvre, defending and maintaining the integrity of the Catholic Faith and the Catholic Priesthood, then why all the secrecy?

    And if that secrecy is by Rome's command, then it's time for the SSPX to quit this negotiation nonsense and try again later, when Rome is ready to convert. Rome lost the Faith, not the SSPX! The SSPX has never changed, adopted heretical doctrines, or lost any part of the Faith. That would be Rome.

    If Rome as a body were Catholic, then they wouldn't have any problem with the SSPX since they're on the same side.

    The SSPX (most of them, and speaking only of their core activities) does the work of Christ. Passing on the complete Catholic Faith, preaching the Gospel, dispensing the sacraments, healing souls, passing on Catholic customs, instructing souls of all ages in secular and Church matters, etc.
    Why should Rome have a problem with that?

    I also would like to point out that these are CLEARLY negotiations, especially since they're sensitive/being done in secret/etc.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline Ethelred

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1222
    • Reputation: +2267/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
    « Reply #11 on: October 08, 2011, 02:23:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Telesphorus
    We were never negotiating, and it's none of your business what's being discussed!

    +1

    Offline Nishant

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2126
    • Reputation: +0/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
    « Reply #12 on: October 08, 2011, 06:15:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • My two cents is that discussion of topics like religious freedom require a certain prudence and therefore the closed-door discussions are justified. The Church is mainly concerned with the freedom of Catholic Christians to preach the Gospel, whose rights are founded in the truth, but, once to Communists, now to Muslims and also to an increasingly secularized world, the statement that Christians ought not to persecuted because Christianity is true, however correct it may be, would hardly be convincing.

    The SSPX's position on religious freedom is correct. But some members of the SSPX think that Rome's position is different from their own, that Rome, and Dignitatis Humanae taught and teach otherwise. That is where the difference is, and why some clarifications are in order. In my understanding, Rome does not, and has not, taught that man has a right to be wrong. Rather, man has a duty to seek the truth, and therefore to do what is necessary, within due limits, to find that truth, and the right to assent to and profess it. So all moral rights are essentially founded in the truth.

    Also, Pope Benedict is now 84. His death or resignation in the near future is not too unrealistic a prospect. And I think it is doubtful if a future Pope would be so ready to discuss the question as he is. So, I think the same opportunity may not necessarily present itself in future. But obviously, this is from the perspective of someone in communion with Rome, so members of the SSPX will likely disagree with me.

    "Never will anyone who says his Rosary every day become a formal heretic ... This is a statement I would sign in my blood." St. Montfort, Secret of the Rosary. I support the FSSP, the SSPX and other priests who work for the restoration of doctrinal orthodoxy and liturgical orthopraxis in the Church. I accept Vatican II if interpreted in the light of Tradition and canonisations as an infallible declaration that a person is in Heaven. Sedevacantism is schismatic and Ecclesiavacantism is heretical.

    Offline Roman Catholic

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2679
    • Reputation: +397/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
    « Reply #13 on: October 08, 2011, 06:39:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nishant2011


     Rather, man has a duty to seek the truth, and therefore to do what is necessary, within due limits, to find that truth, and the right to assent to and profess it. So all moral rights are essentially founded in the truth.




    The Novus Ordo Leaders make it hard for mankind to find the truth, by hiding the truth, and also by denying the truth by their actions.

    Offline Roman Catholic

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2679
    • Reputation: +397/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Press Release from the General House of the Priestly Society of St Pius X
    « Reply #14 on: October 08, 2011, 08:31:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matthew


    I also would like to point out that these are CLEARLY negotiations, especially since they're sensitive/being done in secret/etc.



    Nah, they are just having some discussions during which "proposals" get made.  :rolleyes:

    http://www.dici.org/en/news/press-release-from-the-general-house-of-the-priestly-society-of-st-pius-x/