President Barrack Obama had all the odds against him before becoming Pharao, or today's POTUS (President Of The United States). He is clearly a man of destiny. Some call him the "Leopard, the King of the South" who will lose to the "Bear, the King of the North", as per the Book of Daniel. From a thoughtful analysis of his private correspondence, I came to the conclusion that he is a good man who has absolutely no tolerance for any kind of oppressor. Naturally the subject of abortion is big against him, but there is nothing that he can do, since the abominable abortions are the result of the majority's will. The President is simply surfing on the subject of abortions as on an ocean of filth, which ocean is beyond his control.

 As Senator Obama, he authored an extraordinary book titled "Dream of my Father". I admit to not have had more than a short hour to cross-read it, but this is what I've retained: The "dream" that young Obama had while riding a train from Nairobi Kenya on his way to the village-hut of his ancestors is of a prophetic nature. I retained also that the man who is now our President does mean business, that from two anecdotes about one being of his father, and the other one being of his grand father. Those are the two anecdotes: the first being of his dad who nearly tossed a bystander over a cliff on the subject of a smoking pipe that the unfortunate bystander had dropped (over that cliff). The second anecdote being of his grand-father who chopped the head of a goat with a machete, because the unfortunate goat had eaten a leaf of his garden, in spite of the President's grand-father's warning to the owner (of the goat). I retained that the man is attached to his roots, and that his ancestors were looking at the white man, and their religions, with some detachment, if not without a zest of incredulity and cynicism. It is to be said that Kenya was under the dominion of the British who are non-Catholic Anglicans, therefore an antichrist church.

 I dared write, on a previous posting, that the "man will be the best to negotiate the terms of surrender after the defeat inflicted by Russia". Those lines of mine are extraordinarily audacious, but I won't comment on them. I am just a writing hand.

 It is also written somewhere else, that the rival candidate Mitt Romney will pose a threat against the Catholics, as well as to all Chistian people during the next to come Tribulation because this said rival candidate is a Mormon. The Mormon Church, or LDS, is pure antichrist Church. Their "Christ" is too proud to wear the five wounds. The danger of the Mormons is that they know us the Catholics. During the Tribulation, if the Mormons are in a position of power, they will be the most lethal enforcers of the Mark of the Beast. Remember that the LDS, geared for the Last Days, has the largest human data base in the world...

 The fate of the re-election of our President will be decided by a few votes in November. Curiously the election will be decided in the Battle Born State of Nevada, where I currently reside. I do not know what to make of it.

 Mater boni consilii, ora pro nobis!

 

...I came to the conclusion that he is a good man who has absolutely no tolerance for any kind of oppressor.

 

No tolerance of any kind of oppressor, huh? Oh, is that why he arbitrarily uses drones to kill people in undeclared wars? Is that why he destroyed a country (Libya) and had their legitimate leader (Gaddafi) murdered? Is that why he signed NDAA Sec 1021/1022 into law, which a federal judge, fortunately, repealed temporarily due to its un-Constitutionality. Is that why he extended the "Patriot" Act? Is that why he grew TSA into a monstrous violation of privacy and civil liberty? Is that why he allows for unmanned aerial drones in U.S. skies to spy on Americans, which, in about 7 years, will total at least 30,000 drones. Is that why he signed into law HR 347 that makes it criminal for peaceful protest near federal buildings and public officials escorted by the secret service? Etc etc...

Almost forgot.... He is a good man, huh? Is that why he betrayed his own wife and daughters by smoking a crack pipe and engaging in ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ relations as a state senator? See . If he betrays his own family, then it is that much easier for him to betray the country he presides over as president.

Don't vote for Romney or Obama. Why participate in the illusion? Voting is rigged anyway, but if you are going to vote, then vote 3rd party.

 

True! a Catholic cannot vote for a Marxist, and Obama acts Marxist. Is Obama a Marxist? Difficult to know onces the surface is scratched. He appears to be a very frail man in a big storm. Did you see this week when a pizza-owner gave him a bear-hug? It almost broke his back!

As for Marxism. The whole world is majority Marxist. This is it! The Marxists have the critical mass. Marxism is based of human wakness at having someone else taking the burden. We can safely say that the majority of Americans, us, are cowards, and want someone else take the burden. "We" need a pill; "we" need medical assistance; "we" need a hug; etc.

I do agree the rest of the world is majority Marxist and I do agree that on being against a war with Iran and with a tougher stance towards Israel I agree with Obama but all I'm saying is that a Catholic cannot vote for Obama.

To ascend: Yes there is controversy is the lines that draw my personal conclusion about President Obama.
Every politician must be Machiavelian. That say behind every of those politicians there is an "inner drive", which drive may be ranging from the diabolitical, to the most counter-tyranical. From my personal conclusion that I drew from his words that were sincere, I believe that Barrack Obama does not like dictators at all.

I believe that Barrack Obama does not like dictators at all.

He seems to like himself more than anything. Barack likes Barack.

... but it seems to me liberty can be curtailed when a country is in danger. Lest we forget freedom is a very liberal idea.

What danger? You mean the fairy tale known as "al-Qaeda"? There is more danger coming from D.C. than any foreign threat.

Freedom is not a very liberal idea, rather, it is part of natural law bestowed by Our Lord. That is why He gave us free will, too. Also, the fake paradigm of "liberal vs conservative" is erroneously applied to the Constitution. The Constitution, the highest law of the land, recognizes the very natural law given to us by Our Lord. Anything that deviates from the Constitution simply is unlawful and illegal. Just like anyone deviating from the true Apostolic Catholic Faith becomes heretical. There is no liberal or conservative Catholic. There is only Catholic.

What danger? You mean the fairy tale known as "al-Qaeda"? There is more danger coming from D.C. than any foreign threat.

Freedom is not a very liberal idea, rather, it is part of natural law bestowed by Our Lord. That is why He gave us free will, too. Also, the fake paradigm of "liberal vs conservative" is erroneously applied to the Constitution. The Constitution, the highest law of the land, recognizes the very natural law given to us by Our Lord. Anything that deviates from the Constitution simply is unlawful and illegal. Just like anyone deviating from the true Apostolic Catholic Faith becomes heretical. There is no liberal or conservative Catholic. There is only Catholic.

Ah ha. I guess that means that societies in where monarchy or aristocracy ruled then it was an unsuccessful society since there was no "freedom." Nevermind the fact that our constitutional form of government doesn't even work that well in the United States anyways. I would recommend you get away from that "libertarian freedom" thinking. No government is not the problem it is the way government is used. Remember the Spain of Ferdinand and Isabella? That society denied religious freedom. If government is used for good, such as a right-wing tyrant as President, that is a good thing.

Well I agree that Obama had to deal with President Bush's economic mess but his economic policies sure didn't make it any better.