Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Pregnant women should avoid perfumes  (Read 1170 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31176
  • Reputation: +27093/-494
  • Gender: Male
Pregnant women should avoid perfumes
« on: September 03, 2008, 09:30:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline Dulcamara

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1067
    • Reputation: +38/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Pregnant women should avoid perfumes
    « Reply #1 on: September 03, 2008, 09:41:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'd love it if they'd close the whole cosmetic industry.

    Face painting and that sort of thing is fine for geishas and clowns, but really... I doubt very much the best of lady saints wore rouge.

     :rolleyes:
    I renounce any and all of my former views against what the Church through Pope Leo XIII said, "This, then, is the teaching of the Catholic Church ...no one of the several forms of government is in itself condemned, inasmuch as none of them contains anythi


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31176
    • Reputation: +27093/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Pregnant women should avoid perfumes
    « Reply #2 on: September 03, 2008, 10:20:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I wouldn't be THAT extreme.

    Though I personally prefer women without makeup -- and I'm a normal, red-blooded guy. I just don't like the smell of it, and I know it's not the "real her".

    But I wouldn't go to the extreme of "do I see a subtle dabbing of powder on your right cheek! Yes, I do!  ...  Begone, prostitute!"

    (It's interesting to point out that my mom used minimal makeup, only when she went somewhere, and my sisters used none -- so it's what I'm "used to")

    Remember, it's in woman's nature to want to "look pretty". Women have always worn non-utilitarian pieces of clothing to look more stylish. In general, they have a tendency to "vanity" I guess you could say.

    Vain means "empty" or something without purpose or meaning. What better way to describe a thin silk scarf thrown around the neck? Doesn't exactly keep the cold out, etc. and has no practical purpose. But it makes her "prettier". Guys would never use such articles of clothing. Nor put things in their hair or on their face.

    Men have their own propensities (competition/boasting with other men, anger, pride, etc.)


    Matthew
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline MaterDominici

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 5438
    • Reputation: +4152/-96
    • Gender: Female
    Pregnant women should avoid perfumes
    « Reply #3 on: September 04, 2008, 12:54:21 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Are you excusing vanity just because it's widespread?

    What purpose does makeup serve and when is there ever a good reason to wear it?
    "I think that Catholicism, that's as sane as people can get."  - Jordan Peterson

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31176
    • Reputation: +27093/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Pregnant women should avoid perfumes
    « Reply #4 on: September 04, 2008, 09:24:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well, just because something doesn't serve a utilitarian purpose doesn't mean it's "wrong".

    Using color on clothing could be considered vain in a strict sense. What purpose does it serve? Well, it makes it more aesthetically pleasing. The world needs a bit of "decor".

    Look at God's creation -- very much artistic and with tons of variety and beauty.

    Arranging one's living room in a pleasing manner might be considered "vain" as well, since you could just shove all your couches/loveseats/etc. up against one wall, or arrange them movie theater-style to take up a minimum amount of space.

    I don't think humans were meant to be robots with maximum efficiency. There are things that make us human, even if they are less than a perfectly efficient use of resources.

    I'm just trying to define some parameters here. I haven't exactly addressed the "make up" issue.

    Matthew
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline Dulcamara

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1067
    • Reputation: +38/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Pregnant women should avoid perfumes
    « Reply #5 on: September 04, 2008, 11:14:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I admit I'm a little "extreme" perhaps in my views on these things. I absolutely loathe these things, because they are, by their nature, devices of deception and pride... if not seduction.

    Now I think there is something to be said for beauty, and I think to some extent, it almost seems as though a woman does honor to what she is and should be, when she dresses in a way both modest and "pretty". Beauty is a good, and God is all good things to perfection. If we love beauty, I'm guessing we love it because it is a faint whisper of the Creator, and it speaks to the heart and soul of that eternal, most beautiful abode of the blessed, and of the author of all beauty. Thus do we experience that thrill when we walk into a great church full of beauty.

    I don't think there's anything wrong with beauty. In fact, I think to some extent, we now more than ever need woman (whatever their faces look like or however little they resemble Barbie in figure) who have the guts and integrity to dress like women, and embrace even externally that which is truly beautiful... but above all, virtue.

    When a woman puts on makeup, it's to either hide something, or flatter herself. Women HAVE to wear clothes. They DON'T have to wear makeup. That's one difference. But the other is, rather than discovering the spirit of humility, that may be caused by one too many freckles, a spot, a mole, or whatever else they're trying to cover up with six inches of foundation... they choose instead not only to reject that humility, but even to flatter themselves over and above even the appearances of being "normal" by trying to make themselves up to be more beautiful than they'd even be without the spot or the freckles or whatever.

    But ultimately there are two problems: 1) the refusal of humiliation, which could actually give grace, and show other women that there's more to life than what you look like on the outside... and 2) the fact that finally, a made-up woman IS more attractive... or even seductive, depending on how nice she looked to begin with. And that's not something we should be advertising publicly.

    Now lots of people will think I'm being ridiculous. (I think that has something more to do with the fact that most of us have been born into a day and age where giving yourself a nicer face than what you have is so widespread, rather than that they actually believe in the vanity or consequences of that vanity.) But the fact of the matter is, humility is a virtue. Vanity, seduction, human respect or esteem, and rejection of suffering and humiliation are not. And let me tell you... as a Catholic, I have a lot, LOT more respect for a girl who would rather be laughed at than be vain.

    The most important beauty is, after all, on the inside. It can only be seen in the actions, words, and sometimes in the eyes of a person. (Not their eyeBROWS.) Virtue is what should commend us, not a mask we put on every morning to look prettier than the next girl, or even than ourselves.

    Now when a virtuous woman puts on a pretty, modest dress... she sends a message... there is another option besides wearing a miniskirt and 9-inch heels, or something brown that resembles a tent. There is, happily, an inbetween. A sane, middle ground. Women in the victorian days were plenty modest. Not all of them wore nothing but plain or ugly colors. In fact, you can hardly find patterns of cloth as nice as some of the ones they had back then. But there was something yet dignified, and certainly not automatically seductive, about a woman in a dress with pretty flowers on it. As if it complimented what she was. There's beauty, then there's vanity. But makeup and the like, by their very nature, are all about saving ourselves humiliation, and/or vanity and seduction. It's all about our opinion of ourselves, and everyone else's opinion of us. And there is nothing about those things that compliment a virtuous woman.

    As far as I'm concerned, there is nothing so beautiful as a plain, or even a somewhat homely woman, dressed in modest, feminine clothing, and conducting herself with virtue and dignity and sweetness. And I'd trade one such woman for 95 of the rest in any case. They are the example of what all women should be: decent, and yes, feminine (no fear of wearing a pretty, floral pattern on that modest attire, and not vain if she does)... but not afraid to look the world in the face as she is, suffer whatever humility her real face may occasion (since God gave it to her), and not be ashamed, but at peace with how she looks, precisely because she ISN'T vain.

    It's a hard line to walk, but I think it's the perfect median between vice and scruples here. Not afraid to dress with dignity yet femininity, yet not the least afraid to be what God made you, come what may.

    It's God that has to approve of us, not the people who are little enough to make fun of or sneer at a woman's facial imperfections.
    I renounce any and all of my former views against what the Church through Pope Leo XIII said, "This, then, is the teaching of the Catholic Church ...no one of the several forms of government is in itself condemned, inasmuch as none of them contains anythi

    Offline MaterDominici

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 5438
    • Reputation: +4152/-96
    • Gender: Female
    Pregnant women should avoid perfumes
    « Reply #6 on: September 04, 2008, 02:23:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think the biggest difference between Chant's examples and make-up is that the former is bringing beauty to that which is necessary and the latter is adding that which is unnecessary to enhance beauty.

    My house-making probably follows my thoughts on attire and make-up pretty well. We have many things which are necessary and those things are arranged in a manner which is pleasing and bring some beauty and order to the home. But, we have very few items which serve no purpose other than adding beauty.

    There is a point at which the look of one's home can become a matter of vanity just as much as the look of one's face.

    I could argue the other side of this just as easily, but what it boils down to is the intention of the individual. Bearing in mind that vanity is such an innate part of our culture that most people aren't even aware that what they're doing is primarily for just that reason.
    "I think that Catholicism, that's as sane as people can get."  - Jordan Peterson

    Offline clare

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2270
    • Reputation: +889/-38
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Pregnant women should avoid perfumes
    « Reply #7 on: September 05, 2008, 06:01:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Dulcamara
    When a woman puts on makeup, it's to either hide something, or flatter herself.


    Or out of consideration for others? Other people have to look at her!

    Quote
    Women HAVE to wear clothes. They DON'T have to wear makeup. That's one difference. But the other is, rather than discovering the spirit of humility, that may be caused by one too many freckles, a spot, a mole, or whatever else they're trying to cover up with six inches of foundation... they choose instead not only to reject that humility, but even to flatter themselves over and above even the appearances of being "normal" by trying to make themselves up to be more beautiful than they'd even be without the spot or the freckles or whatever.


    I don't wear make-up, and I can assure that my reason has nothing to do with humility or lack of vanity.

    It is because I was a tomboy in adolescence, when all the other girls were acquiring the skill of applying make-up. It seems that, at 34, it's a bit late for me to learn that skill, and if I did put make up on, I'd make a mess of it, and people would laugh at me!

    If I were humble, I would not care!

    Quote
    But ultimately there are two problems: 1) the refusal of humiliation, which could actually give grace...


    I ought to start wearing make-up then.

    Quote
    Now lots of people will think I'm being ridiculous. (I think that has something more to do with the fact that most of us have been born into a day and age where giving yourself a nicer face than what you have is so widespread, rather than that they actually believe in the vanity or consequences of that vanity.)

    I don't think it's unique to this day and age.

    Quote
    But the fact of the matter is, humility is a virtue. Vanity, seduction, human respect or esteem, and rejection of suffering and humiliation are not.


    Neither is inverted vanity: "See how vain I'm not!"

    Quote
    And let me tell you... as a Catholic, I have a lot, LOT more respect for a girl who would rather be laughed at than be vain.


    A woman's husband might not appreciate people laughing at his wife.


    Offline Adesto

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 317
    • Reputation: +50/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Pregnant women should avoid perfumes
    « Reply #8 on: September 06, 2008, 03:06:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Or out of consideration for others? Other people have to look at her!


    That reminds me of being on retreat with a brilliant Irish priest. It was at school, and the retreat was for girls aged 14-18. When Fr. asked if there were any questions one girl put her hand up and asked "Fr, is it a sin to wear make-up?". Fr replied "Well, only if you take it too seriously and become very vain, or if you waste too much time or money on cosmetics, things like that. And you shouldn't be wearing so much you look like a clown. But," he continued with a twinkle in his eye, "No-one wants to look at an ugly broad!"

    Join the Rosary Apostolate of Our Lady of Perpetual Succour: www.virgoclemens.bravehost.com

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31176
    • Reputation: +27093/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Pregnant women should avoid perfumes
    « Reply #9 on: September 06, 2008, 08:54:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That's an interesting point -- "waste too much time or money on cosmetics."

    You know how expensive makeup is these days -- especially if you don't buy it at wal-mart. You have companies like Avon and Mary Kay which have pretty expensive stuff -- enough to support stay-at-home-moms who sell the stuff PLUS pay the company for the actual makeup. That has to be more expensive than just buying it at the discount store. But how many women sell Avon or Mary Kay? There's got to be a lot of money involved there.

    Plus a lot of makeup has chemicals in it that are dangerous...

    Matthew
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline MaterDominici

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 5438
    • Reputation: +4152/-96
    • Gender: Female
    Pregnant women should avoid perfumes
    « Reply #10 on: September 06, 2008, 12:19:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Adesto
    "No-one wants to look at an ugly broad!"


    It's funny, but probably a bit overboard on his part when speaking to young girls. Peer-pressure is huge at that age and I'm sure any of the girls present who weren't already into make-up would have felt pretty bad hearing from a priest that "no make-up = ugly".
    "I think that Catholicism, that's as sane as people can get."  - Jordan Peterson


    Offline Adesto

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 317
    • Reputation: +50/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Pregnant women should avoid perfumes
    « Reply #11 on: September 06, 2008, 04:48:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • All of us there were already into make-up though, so it was O.K :wink:

    To counterbalance it, the nuns told us were we beautiful without make-up anyways. We got flattered a lot by them!

    As for costly cosmetics, I get mine in bulk on Ebay, so I save roughly 60-70% on them and don't have to worry about shopping for make-up for a year or so at a time. If I bought my foundation in the shops though, it would put me back approx. £23 per 30ml bottle- that's $40. I wouldn't dream of buying it unless I could get it reduced by at least a half.

    Join the Rosary Apostolate of Our Lady of Perpetual Succour: www.virgoclemens.bravehost.com