(I would include obvious agents provocateurs who make unqualified claims and refuse to back their statements with facts and resort to slander on this forum)

Edit:  while continuing to attack the Catholic Church as the culprit in child sɛҳuąƖ abuse, despite the fact that such crimes committed by priests have been and continue to be rare, media and political forces ignore the obvious culprit in the Sandusky case while promoting the very same thing themselves.

The following article throws some interesting light on the Sandusky case and its relationship with the Catholic Church's alleged issues with sɛҳuąƖ abuse.

Many will probably remember "President" Obama's Safe Sex (with kids) Czar Kevin Jennings, defending turning a blind eye to a young man who came to him for counsel when he was being molested by an adult. From Creative Pundit:

The explosive report posted here and here outed Obama’s ‘Safe Schools Czar’s sickening promotion of child porn books to school children.


http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2012/08/political-activists-ignore-obvious-link.html

(I would include obvious agents provocateurs who make unqualified claims and refuse to back their statements with facts and resort to slander on this forum)

Edit:  while continuing to attack the Catholic Church as the culprit in child sɛҳuąƖ abuse, despite the fact that such crimes committed by priests have been and continue to be rare, media and political forces ignore the obvious culprit in the Sandusky case while promoting the very same thing themselves.

The following article throws some interesting light on the Sandusky case and its relationship with the Catholic Church's alleged issues with sɛҳuąƖ abuse.

Many will probably remember "President" Obama's Safe Sex (with kids) Czar Kevin Jennings, defending turning a blind eye to a young man who came to him for counsel when he was being molested by an adult. From Creative Pundit:

The explosive report posted here and here outed Obama’s ‘Safe Schools Czar’s sickening promotion of child porn books to school children.


http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2012/08/political-activists-ignore-obvious-link.html

The Novus Ordo let ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs into the Seminary in the 1960's and 1970's - the Sins we see are mainly the result of these ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.  It isnt really the Sin of Child Molestation so much as it is the Sin of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity.

Traditional Catholic Randi Engle wrote an entire Book on the Subject Entitled The RITE of SODOMY that took 12 years to research - so to pooh pooh the incidents as merely rare occurances is to turn a Blind eye to an obvious widespread issue that the Novus Ordo must confront.  If you honestly think this situation has ended then you are naive.

i cant get people i know to look at such stuff

they assume its bias on church's part

but then this isnt covered by media theyd consider respectable

I would include obvious agents provocateurs who make unqualified claims and refuse to back their statements with facts and resort to slander on this forum

I never slandered you, liar. You accused me of Marxism because I said Benedict does nothing about ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs in the NO clergy. You just got offended because you're a neo-Trad who kisses up to Benedict and explodes at anyone who criticizes him. I can imagine what your reaction must be every time Bishop Williamson (rightfully) criticizes Benedict in his "Eleison Comments" blog.

You are the one who slanders people, and it's not Christian behavior. You remind me of JohnChrysostom (the banned user, not the Saint) who would incessantly slander others here and make it look like they were the ones with the problem. Only he didn't have a liberal mindset...