Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Pius Society to Meet Near Rome to Discuss Preamble  (Read 515 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Augstine Baker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 985
  • Reputation: +274/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • h
Pius Society to Meet Near Rome to Discuss Preamble
« on: September 25, 2011, 02:39:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Pius Society to Meet Near Rome to Discuss Preamble
    In zwei Wochen verhandelt die Bruderschaft

    Italy. [kreuz.net] On the 7th and 8th of October the Superior of the Society of St. Pius X will meet in the Italian District office in Albano near Rome, to have discussions about the negotiations with Rome. This was reported by 'dici.org' on Friday. The Superiors were will be secluded from the public to discuss the Dogmatic Preamble they received from the Congregation of the Faith.

    From kreuz.net...

    http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2011/09/pius-society-to-meet-near-rome-to.html

    http://www.dici.org/

    http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2011/09/this-victory-of-society-of-saint-pius-x.html


    Offline Nishant

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2126
    • Reputation: +0/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Pius Society to Meet Near Rome to Discuss Preamble
    « Reply #1 on: September 25, 2011, 01:35:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Bishop Schneider had a very interesting proposal a few months back. He suggested the promulgation of a new "Syllabus" mentioning specific errors in interpretation of the Second Vatican Council, and reaffirmation of the corresponding doctrines affected, in accord with Pope Benedict's suggested "hermeneutic of continuity".

    If it is true that the SVC defined nothing really new, and it is also true the SSPX believes everything taught before the Council, it is clear that there can be no real difference of faith. I believe there is an orthodox interpretation of the Council and now is the time it needs to be stated, to the universal Church at large.

    The people who really need such a notification are the ultra-enthusiasts on the left who genuinely seem to think, often without having read it, that the Council legitimized everything from religious indifferentism to universalism, and furthermore removed the need for pastoral discipline and sacramental reverence along with discipleship and evangelism.
    "Never will anyone who says his Rosary every day become a formal heretic ... This is a statement I would sign in my blood." St. Montfort, Secret of the Rosary. I support the FSSP, the SSPX and other priests who work for the restoration of doctrinal orthodoxy and liturgical orthopraxis in the Church. I accept Vatican II if interpreted in the light of Tradition and canonisations as an infallible declaration that a person is in Heaven. Sedevacantism is schismatic and Ecclesiavacantism is heretical.