Did I miss something?  Has PEACE come to mean something different from the original meaning?

How is it that the Commander-in-Chief of the single-greatest war-mongering nation in history (albeit under the guidance of THE war mongers par excellence) has been awarded the Nobel PEACE Prize?  Oh, that is right...

War is Peace.  Hate is Love.  Lies are Truth.  Death is Life.

The Nobel prize might have meant something years ago, now it's mostly a popularity contest, as most things devolve in to.

gotta say, guy makes a good point.peace is violence, love is hate...

"Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said it was absurd to give a peace award to a man who had sent 21,000 extra troops to Afghanistan to escalate a war.

"The Nobel prize for peace? Obama should have won the 'Nobel Prize for escalating violence and killing civilians'," he told Reuters by telephone from an undisclosed location. "

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE5981JK20091009

He advanced the cause of communism, and that is why he has the booby prize.  Although now we are in the synthesis stage, referring to Hegel's "thesis, antithesis, synthesis."  

Thesis:  Republics are free.

Antithesis: Communism is bad.

Synthesis:  Communists lead the "free" republics and say that they are democrats who are against communism.

We already saw this from several "popes," like JPII, who was even credited with being an anti-communist hero even though he himself was a raging communist and most likely Jєω.  If this can happen in what is taken to be the CATHOLIC CHURCH, why be surprised when you see a crypto-communist as the President of a country that was founded by Freemasons?  

Obama actually shows pretty openly he's a communist, and gets full consent for it.  They are more dangerous when, like Bush, they hide behind a good ol' boy demeanor.  

The Democrat party used to have to pretend to be the "peace" party, being against war, but they don't even bother with that anymore.  I guess they never did, when you consider Roosevelt.  But at this point, they are DARING you to your face to see that America is a sham.  Frighteningly, even most Catholics here just dunk their heads into the sand to deny what is so very obvious.

I should post my little essay about Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis.  It's the same trick every time -- the devil is a one-trick pony.

He advanced the cause of communism, and that is why he has the booby prize.  Although now we are in the synthesis stage, referring to Hegel's "thesis, antithesis, synthesis."  

Thesis:  Republics are free.

Antithesis: Communism is bad.

Synthesis:  Communists lead the "free" republics and say that they are democrats who are against communism.

We already saw this from several "popes," like JPII, who was even credited with being an anti-communist hero even though he himself was a raging communist and most likely Jєω.  If this can happen in what is taken to be the CATHOLIC CHURCH, why be surprised when you see a crypto-communist as the President of a country that was founded by Freemasons?  

Obama actually shows pretty openly he's a communist, and gets full consent for it.  They are more dangerous when, like Bush, they hide behind a good ol' boy demeanor.  

The Democrat party used to have to pretend to be the "peace" party, being against war, but they don't even bother with that anymore.  I guess they never did, when you consider Roosevelt.  But at this point, they are DARING you to your face to see that America is a sham.  Frighteningly, even most Catholics here just dunk their heads into the sand to deny what is so very obvious.

I should post my little essay about Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis.  It's the same trick every time -- the devil is a one-trick pony.

seems to work at FE too.....Capitalism great, America is ok, just have to get Dems out..Palin all the way 2012!!......same crappola......most trads tend to buy it then make fun of sheeple liberal Catholics.....in the end, same chess game.....