Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => General Discussion => Topic started by: Cryptinox on February 12, 2020, 10:37:03 PM
-
Hello, how do all of the people here explain the alleged Eucharistic Miracles at the Novus Ordo? How could the devil do a false sign where he turns the host into a piece of real flesh that has similar aspects (same blood type, indicates that the flesh was tortured etc.0 to former Eucharistic miracles that happened outside the Novus Ordo?(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b4/2b/f4/b42bf4a6200641c73489a0d7d36bd55d.jpg)
-
Who claims the priests can't consecrate though?
-
Who claims the priests can't consecrate though?
Sedes
-
Without even getting into the validity or invalidity of the new rites/ new mass, it is never right to base your faith off private revelation.
-
Hello, how do all of the people here explain the alleged Eucharistic Miracles at the Novus Ordo? How could the devil do a false sign where he turns the host into a piece of real flesh that has similar aspects (same blood type, indicates that the flesh was tortured etc.0 to former Eucharistic miracles that happened outside the Novus Ordo?
It happened at a NO service, the host was desecrated as a rule, found laying on the floor in the back of the church, an old woman put it in the water, in the tabernacle, and who knows what other sacrileges occurred there with the then, Cardinal Bergolio at the helm. A bloody host, it seems, is an appropriate miracle.
Like Our Lord was accused of being the devil when he expelled the devil, this miracle has not woken up the majority either, rather, they prefer to look upon it as a sign from heaven that the NO church is indeed the true Church. A miracle in both cases, and in both cases the people do not see it for what it is.
That's my opinion.
-
God uses the least likely to show forth His grandeur.