I have read all of Archbishop Lefebvre's papers to the community, and the story of the insurgent activity in the Vatican, such as the Masonic infiltration and such. I'm not sure if all that is true. Is there any citation of the validity of this, even from neutral upper ecclesial echelon.? If true, there should be some.
What does this - neutral upper ecclesial echelon - mean? Just who did you have in mind.
Sorry for confusion. Like bystanders in a dispute, I thought there might be some neutral magesterium as observers/insiders, who through their correspondence to others could shed a detached point of view on the matter.
Well I guess we are all bystanders. It's just that not all bystanders are taking notice.
There is not such thing as a neutral magisterium.
As I said earlier, if you wait for today's regime to acknowledge and condemn the judeo-masonic influence in the Church, you might wait a while.
However there are many trustworthy sources to confirm the infiltration of the Church by judeo-masonry. Jesus Himself told Padre Pio that he had singled out don Luigi Villa for fighting freemasonry in the Church. You can't have a higher recommendation than that. So if you want the truth on this subject, and it is crucial in understanding the state of the Church, you can't go past Fr Villa's writings.
Others here I am sure have other suggestions. I would suggest also that you read
Vicomte Leon de Poncins, Freemasonary and the Vatican
You can buy it through Matthew by clicking the link on the home page:
Click here to start your Amazon.com session so CathInfo gets credit!