Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: new evidence WTC 7 "pulled"  (Read 442 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pravoslavni

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 210
  • Reputation: +12/-0
  • Gender: Male
new evidence WTC 7 "pulled"
« on: June 25, 2008, 01:51:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/062508_unusual_event.htm

    Leaked NIST Docs: "Unusual" Event Before Collapse Of WTC 7

    Unexplained "jet of flames" shot out of window before implosion of skyscraper

    Paul Joseph Watson & Aaron Dykes

    Prison Planet

    Wednesday, June 25, 2008
     |  

       
    Leaked confidential NIST docuмents concerning the investigation into the collapse of WTC 7, the 47-storey skyscraper that was not hit by a plane but imploded in under seven seconds on 9/11, reveal that an "unusual" event preceded the collapse of the building - a "jet of flames" that shot out of several windows after most of the fire had already died down.

    The docuмents - entitled Confidential and Predecisonal Docuмent NIST Report on Building 7 - form the preamble for a long-awaited final verdict on what caused a structurally reinforced building to fall like a controlled demolition despite suffering relatively minimal fire damage.

    Chapter 1: WTC 7 Visual Evidence, Damage Estimates, and Timeline Analysis (William Pitts) is a thorough analysis of window fires by video and picture evidence, which concludes that all major fires before floors 7 and 13 died out prior to collapse.

    The report states, "At 4:38 p.m. all of the windows between 13-44A and 13-47C were open, and the fires responsible for opening the windows had died down to the point where they could no longer be observed."

    "Just prior to the collapse of the building at 5:20:52 p.m. a jet of flames was pushed from windows in the same area. The event that caused this unusual behavior has not been identified."

    The report describes the nature of fires from floors 7-13 and also states, "With the exception of the fires on the 19th, 22nd, 29th, and 30th floors discussed at the start of this section, there is essentially no direct visual evidence of fires on other floors of WTC 7."



    The photographs displayed in the report, many of which have never been seen before, do not show any other damage to the building than the small fires from floors 7-13 and the relatively minimal "scoop" observed on the lower right-hand west face of the building.

    What could have caused this "jet of flames" to shoot out of windows immediately prior to the collapse of the building? The decompression force of a series of explosives or an incendiary device?

    The leaked docuмents precede a BBC hit piece docuмentary which airs on July 6th and is set to claim that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed building in history to suffer a complete collapse from fire damage alone - a scientific impossibility.

    As we reported on Monday, Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department, New York City Housing Authority Barry Jennings, who was trapped inside Building 7, reported explosions going off and witnessing dead bodies before the collapse of either of the twin towers.

    We will be combing through the lengthy NIST docuмents over the course of the next few days to pick out more irregularities and potential smoking guns over the next few days - stay tuned. Feel free to e mail us with any interesting discoveries of your own.



    Offline The Cub

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 313
    • Reputation: +12/-25
    • Gender: Male
    new evidence WTC 7 "pulled"
    « Reply #1 on: June 25, 2008, 05:41:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • Offline Vandaler

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1664
    • Reputation: +33/-7
    • Gender: Male
    new evidence WTC 7 "pulled"
    « Reply #2 on: June 25, 2008, 08:13:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I won't bite this time.  

    But I really look forward to this report.  It's so long overdue, I'm also looking forward for explanation as to why so long.