I have been doing a lot of reading recently about World War II, especially from the German viewpoint. This got me to thinking about the use of concentration/forced labor camps and the Warsaw ghetto.

We all know and agree (or at least most of us) that the Jєωs are the enemies of the Faith, more so than even other enemies such as the Muslims, Protestants, etc.

We also know that at least MOST Jєωs are violently opposed to the Church, the reign of Christ, and Western Civilization. Many who are in positions of power and influence actively work towards this end (think Abe Foxman etc.).

With this in mind, were the ghettos/camps set up by the Germans to put all Jєωs in morally acceptable? It seems to me that an argument could possibly be made that they were, given the necessity of ending Jєωιѕн domination over various sectors of society (finance, arts and literature, etc.).

What principles of moral theology or Catholic social principles would cover this topic?

The extermination of Jєωs by mass shootings, starvation, etc. (which certainly did occur, although not nearly in the numbers that the ADL et al. like to claim) is, I believe, a separate topic. I highly doubt that such actions could be moral under any circuмstances, and so I don't believe that that is a part of my question or the topic of this post. I am not talking about the "h0Ɩ0cαųst", but about forced labor/cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs/ghettos.

Whaddaya know, "paxromanum18" makes his appearance to leap to the defence of nαzι Germany.  

Jєωs were traditionally somewhat segregated from Christian society.

Jєω's control the world.

The h0Ɩ0cαųst was a lie concocted by the Jєωs.

The "cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs" are a gross exaggeration of History fed to us by the Jєωs.

Jєωs achieved there objectives.

Period.

Jєω's control the world.

The h0Ɩ0cαųst was a lie concocted by the Jєωs.

The "cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs" are a gross exaggeration of History fed to us by the Jєωs.

Jєωs achieved there objectives.

Period.

Yep!

brainglitch has no credibility. he/she was caught lying about PaxRomanum in the anon section.

I did not lie. I pointed out the fact that PR18 greatly exaggerates the importance of race over religion and considers it practically impossible for Jєωs to sincerely convert (although he did eventually admit it was theoretically possible).

Now, back on topic- Jєωs were traditionally in ghettos in Europe. I want to know if there was a qualitative difference between this, and what the nαzιs were attempting to achieve.

I have been doing a lot of reading recently about World War II, especially from the German viewpoint. This got me to thinking about the use of concentration/forced labor camps and the Warsaw ghetto.

We all know and agree (or at least most of us) that the Jєωs are the enemies of the Faith, more so than even other enemies such as the Muslims, Protestants, etc.

We also know that at least MOST Jєωs are violently opposed to the Church, the reign of Christ, and Western Civilization. Many who are in positions of power and influence actively work towards this end (think Abe Foxman etc.).

With this in mind, were the ghettos/camps set up by the Germans to put all Jєωs in morally acceptable? It seems to me that an argument could possibly be made that they were, given the necessity of ending Jєωιѕн domination over various sectors of society (finance, arts and literature, etc.).

What principles of moral theology or Catholic social principles would cover this topic?

The extermination of Jєωs by mass shootings, starvation, etc. (which certainly did occur, although not nearly in the numbers that the ADL et al. like to claim) is, I believe, a separate topic. I highly doubt that such actions could be moral under any circuмstances, and so I don't believe that that is a part of my question or the topic of this post. I am not talking about the "h0Ɩ0cαųst", but about forced labor/cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs/ghettos.

Is it "morally acceptable" for the Jєωs in Israel to set up cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs and ghettos for the Palestinians today?

The difference there is, the Arabs are the indigenious peoples who are prisoners within their own lands by a foreign invader enabled by the "world" community known as the U.N. while much of Jєωry in Europe operated covertly behind the scenes, scheming and swindling the finances out of the nations under the guise of "International" Bankers.

Corralling the Jєωs was NS Germany's way of protecting their nation from a malevolent presence, at least that was their view at the time. Maybe not each and every Jєω was an usurper of his own volition, but world wide Jєωry did declare an open war on Germany shortly after Hitler was elected.

Now was it "morally accepetable" for them to defend themsleves?

You tell me.

Jєωs were traditionally somewhat segregated from Christian society.

Here I should change this for you: "Jєωs were traditionally somewhat kicked out of countries like Isabella's Spain under a Christian society."

Quote from: TheKnightVigilant

I happen to be of the opinion that beliefs and doctrine are more important than ethnic background, but that's besides the point of this thread.

And braininglitch has shown to be ethnically attached to his Jєωιѕн background, ignoring all other loyalty...this is not too surprising since those who are Jєωιѕн have the true power...

You are lying again. I am not attached at all to that background. I can't understand why you would say that, when I am defending and praising the establishment of ghettos for Jєωs, to prevent them from dominating society! If you can't see that then you are completely myopic.