Came in to thumb up a couple of posts.
Alaric you say you want to praise their actions not their false doctrines. I believe that, but then you have to think, what are their actions? Threatening to kill her? Sure they may have the "fortitude" to defend their beliefs but let's not pretend our Christian virtue of fortitude is anywhere near related to death threats. We don't stand up enough for our Faith that is true but I don't believe holding up Muslims as an example is helpful since we shouldn't behave the way they do anyway. It's kind of a useless comparison.
I didn't see anywhere where they threatened to kill her, where does this come from? And even if they did, can't you get it that these people see LG and the secular hedonists like her as a viable threat to the fabric of their society? do you not see this is part of a greater culture war and attack on all things they consider moral and upright?
What is it with people in the West these days in dealing a debased nature and immorality?
Let's see: you left out "with?" I.e., "...in dealing with a debased..." -- that would be what, LGG's debased nature and immorality, or the Mohammedans' debased nature and LGG's immorality, or the Mohammedans' immorality and LGG's debased nature, or both? After all, they're both debased and immoral, so I'm not sure what your point is here.
Are you all caught up in this "we can't judge others" fallacy? Of course that rule goes out the window when it comes to applauding muslims for doing the right thing.
And they do the right thing in lots of cases like this, right? Or are you saying something else?
But having said this, I said nothing about emulating muslims by using "death threats" ( which wasn't the case anyway here), I said maybe we should start emulating people who actually will stand publicly and vocally and defend their faith and stand against evil. I don't see what is so difficult conceiving this.
You would have to live under a rock to not know that LGG feared for her life when she took one look at that angry mob. She probably reads more than you do, is the problem.
What is it with people in the West these days in dealing a debased nature and immorality?
This is what is so depraved about Trads caught up in approval of the Zionist/anti-Muslim program. The anti-Muslim program has to do with trying to corrupt the laws and morals of the people who live in Muslim countries, and if Christians are the casualties and collateral damage of the conflicts provoked by that campaign, it is nothing to the Zionists.
We actually have the lawyer of the SSPX speaking of the ʝʊdɛօ-Christian identity of wine, music (like LadyGaga) and miniskirts.
This is insanity, and this is sadly seems to be embedded in the subconscious thinking of many trads. The media is very very powerful, even among those whom ostensibly reject it.
How about those who don't watch the MSM? Is the "media" powerful over those who ignore it?
So any Catholic who has something to say about the evils of Mohammedan morals and shariah law is "trying to corrupt the laws and morals of the people who live in Muslim countries?" I'm sorry, Telesphorus, you have some remedial training to undertake. Make that "a lot" of training.
Please allow me to clear up a little confusion here.
The FPI was doing one thing.
They were attempting to protect their women from Western influence, which they sincerely believe is abominable.
And according to shariah law, they have the right, nay, the DUTY, to use force, even deadly force, to protect their social structure.
According to shariah law, a man can beat his wife if she disobeys him.
He can kill his daughter or daughters, if she or they disobey(s) him.
And if he does these things, the law will grant him immunity because he is the Lord of his family, even to the point of capital punishment.
That's probably too much for you to handle already, so I won't give more details, milk to children and all that stuff.