Author Topic: More sewage at fisheaters - Thai lady boys (Read 1412 times)

sedetrad · « **on:** December 02, 2009, 02:33:41 PM »

http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com/index.php/topic,3425965.0.html

sedetrad · « **Reply #1 on:** December 02, 2009, 02:34:48 PM »

Hear is the relevent post:

Dear Forum,

My spiritual father and director is a very holy and devout gαy priest in the SSPX. No, I won't give out his name as I don't want those filled with the spirit of Satan and hate to have him thrown onto the street. He has helped me greatly in living chastely even though I am gαy. He has set an edifying example for me. He has recently fallen from chastity and has been seeing a 22 year old Thai lady boy that he met on line. Thai lady boys are hard for gαy men to say no to. I tell him to end his relationship before he is found out. What should I do. I pray everyday that he comes back to chastity. I firmly believe that Satan is possessing that Thai lady boy into seducing such a good priest. Thank you all for your advice.

Steven

Belloc · « **Reply #2 on:** December 02, 2009, 02:41:26 PM »

This is sick Shiessan, is this really a post at FE? I am blocked here at work from looking at link???

talk about calling good evil and evil good!!!

no matter the mans inclinations, is is no longer "holy" if he is dating a man and likely, acting out physically and mentally putrid sins.......

Satan is indeed acting :devil2: in more ways then this sicko thinks.....

Caraffa · « **Reply #3 on:** December 02, 2009, 02:56:47 PM »

Quote from: sedetrad

Hear is the relevent post:

Dear Forum,

My spiritual father and director is a very holy and devout gαy priest in the SSPX. No, I won't give out his name as I don't want those filled with the spirit of Satan and hate to have him thrown onto the street. He has helped me greatly in living chastely even though I am gαy. He has set an edifying example for me. He has recently fallen from chastity and has been seeing a 22 year old Thai lady boy that he met on line. Thai lady boys are hard for gαy men to say no to. I tell him to end his relationship before he is found out. What should I do. I pray everyday that he comes back to chastity. I firmly believe that Satan is possessing that Thai lady boy into seducing such a good priest. Thank you all for your advice.

Steven

So according to this person, someone who is against ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is filled with the spirit of Satan? Righhht...this person is sick.

Caraffa · « **Reply #4 on:** December 02, 2009, 03:11:24 PM »

Here are some more goldies from FE:

Quote

We trust in Gods mercy for our little ones. Only those who have never had their own die before birth, and hold them dead in their arms could so coldly say that they go to hell[limbo]. That goes for theologians too. Call me a Neotard or whatever you like, but I like the CCC's passages about infant death. We trust in Gods mercy. God is not an asshole.

I like how this person can only believe in the God which they can conceptualize. Its just more American style Christianity-I believe what I want to believe. The liberty of conscience leads straight to hell.

And one more thing, its true that God is not an asshole, but unfortunately Adam and Eve were.

Quote

I'm with you mamalove. I don't believe God would send an innocent baby to hell or deny them the Beatific vision, when they never even had the OPPORTUNITY to be baptized. Holding my little baby in my hand (she was 20 weeks), I can only trust in God's mercy.

Notice the Protestantism in this one as well as the Rights of Man undertones. The mentor of St. Pius X, Cardinal Pie, once said that man is born with both a right to death and a right to hell.

Its amazing how all of these people are saying that non-Christians can go to heaven, because they live decent moral lives or that they live the beatitudes. Have they not heard of natural virtue? Pelagianism still lives.

sedetrad · « **Reply #5 on:** December 02, 2009, 04:52:37 PM »

It is the fruits of the forum owners and their sins.

MrsZ · « **Reply #6 on:** December 02, 2009, 05:40:56 PM »

Are you sure it's not a troll?

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #7 on:** December 02, 2009, 06:00:09 PM »

Didn't Quisling just lecture this entire site about the sin of detraction on internet forums? Plus disrespect of clergy? The hypocrisy is incredible but doesn't surprise me. Quisling has a history of selectively pulling out these dual cards to silence opposition, yet he allows these things freely when he agrees with said detraction/ calumny.

So now he allows this guy to most likely calumniate an SSPX priest? This is especially grievous when the Society priests in Southeast Asia can be narrowed down to a few.

Disgusting. This guy should have been banned a long time ago and the thread taken down. Matthew would have had none of it.

greenhill · « **Reply #8 on:** December 04, 2009, 04:13:49 AM »

Lot of judgement and violent language going on here.

clare · « **Reply #9 on:** December 04, 2009, 05:35:44 AM »

Quote from: MrsZ

Are you sure it's not a troll?

Let's look at some of the responses he got:

Quote

And you know all of these specific details... how?

Quit making up stuff. Go pester some other forum.

Quote

Don't feed the troll.

Quote

Yeah...I'm calling B.S. here. If you were going to do something that would endager your entire career, I don't think you would tell anyone who could expose you, even accidently, especially in such detail. Furthermore, I suspect the SSPX is pretty careful about ordaining anyone with ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ inclinations. This does not sound like a realistic senario to me.

It could happen, sure, but almost every single post this poster has made has been about ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity and it seems he is deliberately fishing for contrary comments and then accusing those who make them of hate, though none of them has been hateful in the slightest. I suspect he is trying to uncover some "gαy-hate" among trads.

Furthermore, there is a prayer request in the Oratory asking for prayers for Bp. Dolan and Fr. Cekada because they are ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs, and I have never heard of any such thing.

I think this user wants to cause trouble.

Quote

Agreed with the anti-trolls. I apologise for my naievity in thinking he was genuine.

Quote

If you are really a struggling, reformed gαy, you dont go advertising it in your sig.

Quote

I cannot ever believe that this will happen in the SSPX. For all the controversies surrounding the society they would have weeded him out earlier before his ordination.

Anyway, any DECENT catholic will report him immediately (if such a thing could ever happen) to prevent the priest from saying Mass sacrilegiously.

Quote

I am a devoted SSPX, and have a cousin who is an SSPX priest...its pretty intense, and i doubt something like this would get past the first year in the seminary....i smell BS

Quote

If one is struggling to overcome, say, alcoholic tendencies, he wouldn't pick a screenname like Boozehound.

And if tradcathgαy is what he claims to be, all I can say to him is

Get your butt back in the closet.

Yes, I'm a hater. Go ahead and call me that. It makes as much sense as neocon......

Quote

The SSPX, doing what the Church had always done before the horrid "council," has done an extremely good job in assuring that only the most qualified become priests of Christ and His Church. This sounds awful fishy to me - sounds like a bit of trolling...

Quote

Dude, whether your for real or not, get lost.

Maybe he's real about himself and a particular priest, and just put the SSPX bit in to get attention on this forum? Maybe he's posting the same kind of crap all over many catholic forums because he genuinely believes his creepy "spiritual father" is a holy man with a weakness for frigging "lady-boys" or whatever? I'm sure such problems exist in the mainstream church. Well, I don't "think", I know. It's not outside the realms of possibility for an sspx priest I guess (I have known a couple of very strange ones!) but it's triply sickening if it is an sspx priest.

Whatever, get lost, and take your wolf in sheep's clothing "priest", if he exists, with you.

Quote

First of all I dotn belive u. And hers why.
If this was true and u truly cared for this holy priest then u wouldn't of spewed this here.
U gave up way to much info enough to show this is bullshit.
U did not need to give his order or anything. Further and maybe ill stop before I say something worthy of being banned.
Ur full of it. And u know it. It's a sin to lie and a grave offense against CHRIST to slander his holy priests.
I won't waste any more words with u. Because if this is not true then your wicked. If this is truer then u have betrayed a sinnfull priest by comming to a bunch of guys on the net and slandering him. So
Sip
Go play with ur tai ladyboy cuz when ur numbers up u will pay.
Godless.

But yes, let's pretend that this troll only got lots of support from the horrid liberals at FE instead.