Are you thinking what I'm thinking?  If 68% of people truly believed that Jesus is the Son of the Father, and what that truth really means, the world would be oh so different.

On the other hand, 77% believing in aliens     is a pretty respectable victory for the enemy.  

Aliens are distractions from the devil. Anything that frees men from the responsibility towards the true God are easily absorbed by the minds of modern men.

"When men cease to believe in God, they do not believe in nothing, they believe in everything." Chesterston.

From todays UK newspapers

"Suspicion has fallen on Zaharie because the Malaysian authorities believe the missing Boeing 777 was deliberately turned off course and flown low to avoid radar detection. Only an ­experienced pilot would know how to do it."

Researchers calculated that since accessible records began in 1996, Britain had voted No 55 times but the Council passed the legislation every time.

The measures included car emissions rules which Britain estimated could cost it £55.5 billion.

ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan members boasting of their subvertion/persecution of Christian countries right under your noses!

and we all know why Rome is in bed with government psyops, aliens being one of many.

Americans believe in aliens, well so does Rome, for a long time.

Here is the latest

http://www.catholicworldreport.com/NewsBriefs/Default.aspx?rssGuid=vatican-launches-astronomy-class-for-parish-educators/#.UzDId86idGI

and what about this:

http://www.traditioninaction.org/Questions/B674_UFO.html

The first link didn't work for me -- website malfunction.

The TIA page has an article (site draws a blank, again) including this paragraph:

The Vatican is not a cutting edge group; it generally moves so slow that it is painful to much of the world's congregation. After all, this is the same organization that to this day does not allow women to be priests or any form of contraception. This is the same organization that forced Galileo to recant his findings [?] and put him under house arrest for the remainder of his life for telling the world that the earth is not at the center of the universe.



...And,,,,,,,,,,,,, those are what,,,,,,,,,,,,,, not good things?  

BTW, what exactly were Galileo's "findings" anyway, that he was the only person alive who knew how to interpret what he saw using a telescope that he had invented?  (It was 250 years before photography so there wasn't any way of taking pictures of what was visible in the telescope.)


.

'GER'-Aliens everywhere


OB-STAT(Teacher?)

Strong's Hebrew: 178. אוֹב (ob) -- a bottle (made from animal skin), a ...
biblehub.com/hebrew/178.htm‎
ob: a bottle (made from animal skin), a necromancer. Original Word: אוֹב. Part of Speech: Noun Masculine Transliteration: ob. Phonetic Spelling: (obe)

WITCHCRAFT - JєωιѕнEncyclopedia.com
www.Jєωιѕнencyclopedia.com/articles/14960-witchcraft‎
These practises were varied, and are denoted by several different Hebrew words. ... The spirit of the dead was called "ob," and the consultation of such a spirit ...The Witch of Endor was a ba'al ob

Freaky - playing 'what's in a name'

If there are confused souls out there who do not believe in Our Lord, other beliefs notwithstanding,

Then I pity them because they are lost souls.  

There's another way of looking at that.  

On the question of how many Americans are aware that God's revelation includes that Jesus is the Son of God:  

Based on your proposition, Capt McQuigg, with which BTW I wholeheartedly agree, at the Last Judgment Jesus Christ will separate the sheep from the goats, according to Sacred Scripture (it is consequently a dogma of the Faith), and therefore, it would not be unfair in such a survey to divide the population into 2 (two) groups ('categories'):  those who are aware and those who are not aware of this teaching (God's revelation... of God).  

Note well, this is not an act of "judgmentalism" because it does not separate the participants in the same way that Our Lord will do so when He ultimately JUDGES them, so we are not "playing God."   All it does is arrange the data based on the answers provided by the participants, when they are asked if they are aware, or if they are not aware of the 'teaching'.

Then assess all participants based on the following criteria (all of which would have to be follow-up questions on the poll):

~  How many in each group think that being aware of this is the same thing as believing it?

~  How many in each group think that being aware of this is unrelated to believing it?

~  How many in each group think the poll ought to be considered an act of terrorism?

~  How many in each group think that the poll is an attack on their personal freedom?

~  How many in each group plan to contact their local bishop to complain about the poll?

~  How many in each group would seek starting a lawsuit with the SPLC over this?

~  How many in each group would think that this doctrine is just "an opinion?"

~  How many in each group would say that this is not a doctrine at all?

~  How many in each group would bemoan the absence of a third category?

~  How many in each group feel a strange urge to cut off someone's head when they read the principal question?

~  How many have any feelings of aggression after reading the follow-up questions?

~  How many in each group are baptized Catholics in good standing?

~  How many in each group are Catholic priests, bishops or cardinals?

~  How many in each group are soon to be Confirmed or have been Confirmed?





I would especially like to know how the data compares between Confirmandi in the NovusOrdo parishes and in the Canonized Latin Mass parishes.  

There are no doubt a lot more follow-up questions that could be asked.  In my own experience, I have encountered people in each of these areas, so I know there would be a variety of answers.  It seems to me that just 100 years ago there may not have been such 'diversity' but now that the liberals fairly worship 'diversity' like it's some kind of object of meet adoration has had the effect of further 'scattering the flock' even if the 'Shepherd is struck' anyway.  


.