I thank both Mathew for his diligence, and Spiritus Sanctus for his indulgence to keep me in the forum! I admit that I wanted not to climb back on the soap-box to have my confused lines echoed onto the roof-tops! I must confess to wish to see Nineveh perish while I watch from under the shades of a tamarisck tree, but it is not to be so! I have to return to the forum three days later as if being regurgitated by some beast. My apologies for the shock caused this past week (in a previous posting) among the faithful brothers, but I assure you that Our Blessed Mother appeared beautiful, kind and concerned for all her children during a dark night by a small campfire. My miserable scribe's hand, often, goes faster than my mind in my zeal for truthfulness and quick imaging!
 
I report a vision of a headline which appeared long enough to be read, and too fast to identify from which newspaper it was. The headline said: MITT ROMNEY IS OUR NEXT PRESIDENT! This means that the candidate rival of our present President will win in November. President Obama, who yesterday apologized for his campaigners "to go overboard" (against his rival) might not want to be at the helm when the ship sinks. I truly believe that he is a good man just caught in the tempest began by the sorcerer's apprentices who propped him to the Oval Office. Barrack Obama is not a bad man in the depth of his soul. He is sensible and kind to his own mother through the opening lines of his extraordinary book titled Dream of my father, when young Obama went in search for his dad in the savannas of Kenya. He said that his Caucasian mother, for he is a mulatto, was going to exotic markets to buy accessories such as colorful scarfs that she would wear for a while; that she was sometimes buying a cow for a destitute indigenous, and traveled in far away lands. Those are lines that normally should sound contemptuous but that sound compassionate in his hands... Now older Obama is pharaoh, or POTUS (President Of The United States), and he knows that he might be The leopard, the king of the south who will lose to the bear, the king of the north for he too has read the Book of Daniel. He is scared. To put it bluntly, the man at the helm is afraid to screw-up!
 
Who is Obama's direct puppet master? The answer is the philanthropist George Soros. This man is portrayed in a researched piece by Steve Kroft (60 minutes). Soros feels good at all his misdeeds, as per some shameful past interviews. He tinkers from behind the scene at concocting world calamities, and at hiding them from the public eyes through the tentacles of his medias, and, by his venality, at buying silence on what should be said. Poor soul! He will, after gaining one more medal, join the likes of George Clemenceau, the atheist French statesman who created the Fuhrer of the Third Reich by injecting negro French troops in the Rhineland in order to give black babies to the gretchen (source: Le dernier défi de George Clemenceau- Ed. Plon, i.e. this racist monstruosity by the French statesman Clemenceau against the Germans, for your personal information, was condemned by only one voice in the world at that time: Eugenio Cardinal Pacelli, Nonce at Berlin, and future Vicar of Christ known as Pius XII). Soros is not much better than Clemenceau with his agenda of abortions and euthanasia. This is who is manipulating our President.
 
Does George Soros manipulate Mitt Romney? Not much, as per the piece of Steve Kroft. Soros has successfully neutralized the grass-root movement named Tea-Party led by Mrs. Sarah Palin, but so far he does not have full control of the Republican Party. George Soros is worried about that, and I am about to tell you why: If Mitt Romney wins, then Soros will become useless to his own puppet-master, and therefore his days will be numbered... unless, he successfully brings America to its knees before the next taking of the office of the presidency of January 2013. Soros will have therefore about 60 days for the defeat of both the US and the UK forces against the forces of Russia in order to save his own skin. If a defeated President Barrack Obama loses WWIII (which has began Nov 23, 2010 -please see previous postings), then the President will negotiate the terms of surrender, and may stay in power as a perhaps director of the then greatly diminished United States, which means that Soros will stay in power, and therefore will have a little more time to enjoy life on the surface before being hurled into hell.
 
What is the leverage point of George Soros? It is a military operation by the USA against Syria (Note: President Michel Salomon Sarkosi of France, who was the sidekick to the US/UK policie, has, undoubtedly by the grace of God, lost re-election this last Spring, and the successor President Holland of the Republique de France has shown more neutrality regarding foreign adventurism). Soros might attempt to bring WWIII to a brutal end, the end of America, through Syria. Syria played a biblical role in the Old Testament, but since more recent times, it has become a sacred land where Our Blessed Mother ascended into heaven (this fact of the "ascension" is known to us the faithful since Our Blessed Mother did not die, because in spite of her sorrow, she remained immaculate, therefore never knew the sin that causes death, while Jesus Christ her divine Son died because He took all the sins of humanity upon Him. The term "assumption" is given by the Church for the consumption of the infidels of the rest of the world). President Obama, although he is not a Catholic, understands perfectly the gravity of violating the land of Syria through a military operation. He has acknowledged this fact, by the recent soft-pedaling of his politic of aggression against the Arabs, as well as through some of his private writings. We have the proof on hand, and the whole world can witness of all that. That say, the malevolent Soros may still, through his medias and his venality, pull the trigger of all hell, which means forcing a "rescue action" for the oppressed Syrian people, and thus cause a big enough provocation against Russia. Russia will consequently charge "as a whirlwind" and defeat us in a one hour-long nuclear strike.
 
Are we that weak in front of Russia? The late Admiral Rickover said that the survival time of a surface fleet against a sub-surface fleet was short.
Our forces depend upon the air forces and upon a large number of floating gas-stations named aircraft-carriers, which means that in an all-out conflict we are not the strongest. Our forces are geared towards gun-boat diplomacy against inferior nations, but not against a superpower such as a determined Russia. Then also the world opinion may be turned against us within days when the crime of 911 will be exposed to have been an inside job in order to make-up a pretext for invading Iraq (see my previous postings, explaining how China may expose the crime of 911 since they have the evidences in their hands and on their soil). The turmoils of those last few days caused in the Arab world about a movie that defames Islam is nothing but media manipulation in order to test the volatility of the situation, and the exploit-ability of the "hatred for America" that is coddled by the same medias. We are very weak!
 
What can be done? God has given to my visionary the possibility of Mitt Romney to be our next President. This solution, if His Majesty decides, will be just has bad as if our present President remains for a second term. The outcome will be just as bad with either result of the election. God will not be dupe at the decision by the voters about the abortion issue, for He knows, as well as Our Blessed Mother, that the majority does not care about the murder of the innocents, but that the election will be decided upon which greed will win over the other. By greed, I name the "tax-cut" on one side, and the "more social-benefits" on the  other. God is irritated by such petty and selfish issues, and will show the fury of His anger about a real issue that either candidate cannot tackle and merely speak about for the sole sake of gaining a few votes. God is about to destroy us. In order to avoid destruction we have to be pleasing God, and our sorrowful and weeping Mother. We have to take measures that will satisfy heaven. Our bishops and priests have the answer: prayer and penance. God will do the rest! Our Father Almighty may dissipate this planetary maze in an instant. It works simply if Our Father in Heaven see our penances and hear our supplications! See how His Majesty lately took us out of the snares of the wicked by just giving Menzingen the right inspiration of severing from Rome. In an instant the authentic Roman Catholic Church, us, has escaped from the snare of the apostates. It can be again done on a global scale for an impious world, but faith is required from us!
 
What can our kings and patricians do, because we are talking of the fate of the entire world? Perhaps they may take radical measures as did take the inhabitants of Nineveh: They may take a sack-cloth; put a sack-cloth on the animals of the farm; repent, toss themselves dust over their head. For the regent-queens such as Secretary Clinton, or warmongers in the likes of Condolese Rice, may be... those ladies may shave their head, and weep, and fast.
 
What can George Soros do? He is a miscreant, he is ruthless, he is venal, but if he amend his life, his vast fortune alone could erect many cathedrals and a cluster of churches, each with high campaniles holding large bells ringing over the lands and calling the faithful for the adoration of the merciful God who died for so many. Soros will face the Judge one day. His advocate may be here for him, if... he repents. This glorious advocate has not lost a single case since the day of her Assumption. She is her mother too, and him, little George, is just one of her bad boys, who... could be saved simply by admitting his foolishness at playing a game that everyone knows to be a losing game.
 
This is a long and sinuous posting! My regrets! I am not as smart as learned men, and that is not my fault. And so please my dear brothers, be compationate for my verbal limitations, and please pray that some more able writing-hand takes-on the relay! Amen.
 
 
 
 
 

Obama voted for partial birth abortion. He is evil.

I truly believe that he is a good man just caught in the tempest began by the sorcerer's apprentices who propped him to the Oval Office. Barrack Obama is not a bad man in the depth of his soul.

He was our representative and senator and he is evil.  Sorry, the man has no morals, supports killing babies, and wrote legislation supporting the firing of a nurse who pulled an abortion survivor who was crying out of the biological waste bag...he is evil.  

to Spiritus Sanctus: The silence that you ask is no longer tolerable. The Church does not have the monopoly of informations coming from dreams, visions, apparitions and transportations.

The silence imposed by the Church has led us to the disaster began in Rome on January 1960. When the Third Secret of Fatima was silenced!

To Lauriann again: I feel contrite at causing you scandal.
We have a violent man in the Oval Office who was put in place while having innocent blood on his hands. I recall also my tears when Terry Shiavo was being put to death by starvation while both the Bush brothers (one was President and the other Governor of Florida) were hiding, and I recall my contrition at not been able to do anything.
My posting warns that nothing will change with Mitt Romney as our next President because during the 60 days gap between Election Day and Inauguration Day, the United States (and the United Kingdom) may be defeated by the Russians. This will be a chastizement due to our lack of prayers.

To Vandaler: Thank you for the compliment, and thank you for the critic.

I'll explain: I am not a polemist, nor a party-leader. I write personal letters, even now to the public. This is what I do. I did not expect to be put on a soap-box in just a few days, and this is the reason that I am unequiped to resist the arguments of others when they come from the heart.

TO VANDALER:To your yesterday's critic that I am easy to make a 180 degree turn, I responded in a flash. This said reflex response is correct to your curiosity, but it still needs to be dwell upon, because it concerns the validity of my entire work.
 I fear to exalt myself, as well as to put God's words in my own mouth, but it is necessary to-day that I speak about who I am. I originally entered the arena of this blog-site a few weeks ago in order to take side in a fraternal squabble within the SSPX concerning the Menzingen/Rome relations. I made just five postings, which proved to be late and futile, since Bishop Fellay had already made his decision to break-off from Rome. May the SSPX return quickly back in order; may the three bishops currently in either exile, or house arrest be allowed to resume their function; may Father Pfeiffer be freed from his jail and may he be treated decently. I had no reason to remain on this blog, but then I could not but remain here for a reason that I cannot understand. It is said that there are three classes of men: the ones who make things happen; the ones who watch things happen; and the ones who do not know what happened. I belong to the latest of those three classes, for I place my entire trust in the infinite clarity of mind of Jesus Christ.
 I then made two postings that caused waves. Those two postings seem to have an apocalyptic message to the point of forcing the action of Spiritus Sanctus (who seems without a doubt a prime member of the core of this forum), to require silence from me; a thing that I may not do. Those two said postings are reports of a vision, and the other of a dream. The vision depicts Blessed Joseph in a graphic manner, and the dream narrates a conversation with the Blessed Virgin Mary. There are two nameless persons in the vision depicted, who, to-day, appears to be "the woman and her child fleeing from the dragon", which is a vision of the Book of Revelation. The dream itself narrates the Blessed Virgin Mary in a rustic unassuming and approachable manner in the darkness of the night by a small camp-fire. Our Blessed Mother who remained nameless, but who later was identified as Our Lady of Ransom gave to "Dreamer" advices at how to pray meaningfully while showing that she was to remain with us, since she was eating finger-food, as if during the time of the Tribulation. Those two said postings are apocalyptic. No wonder Spiritus Sanctus became indignant!
 Now came my spontaneous response to Loriann to her cry of outrage at propping-up President Obama. I joined her outrage since our President is complicit of the murder of a born baby who was supposed to be aborted, while at the same time I say that in the depth of his soul, Obama is a good man... Badaboom! my entire work loses credibility! I must defend this work! Jack in the Box must be explained, and its position must be dwell-upon.
 
Jack in the Box writes letters, and is perhaps no more that the carrier of those letters, which means a nobody for this world. Jack (or Jill for its identity is not worth been known) started writing letters at a young age. His grand-mother, a school-teacher, made him write to various cousins, aunts, grand-aunts and to his godmother. He was given an elegant Empire antique secretary's desk, and a small Waterman fountain-pen that fit his little hand. Letters of that nature required a rigorous attention to exactitude, while being rich in details because they circulated within a thigh circle. Each letter was to narrate a family reunion; a trip; a movie, etc, all events known to all from one season to the next. Jack has never changed in the genre of reporting with exactitude, even after escaping to America. Jack is not interested with fiction. The exception being that he once wrote a published real story involving a supernatural event while presenting it as pseudo-fictional in order to protect the persons involved. The reports of the two postings of the Vision of Blessed Joseph, and of the Dream of the Blessed Virgin are therefore reported with exactitude.
 
The character of Jack in the Box is also doubtful for propping-up a man who is then also accused of a murder. This is the defense of Jack in the Box. Let's get a perspective as to who is President Obama. He is the same as his two predecessors Presidents Bill Clinton and G.W. Bush: All those three Presidents are representing puppets. They are not bad men, but all three are manipulable, and most certainly subject to black-mail. All those three men also never lost a major election, proving some integrity, some inner-drive that the majority of the voters accepted at each successive election (Vox populi, vox Dei, which Voice of the people through the voice of God allowed once the election of Adolph Hitler as a punishment to the world). All three are involved in the 911 crime: During Clinton's office, the Waco, followed by the Oklahoma City bombing was a dry-run for 911; during Bush's office, the Oklahoma City bombings traces were erased with the quick putting to death of Timothy Mc. Veil, which showed the willingness of G.W. (Bush) to accept 911, which crime occurred shortly thereafter; the Obama's office has put to death Osama Bin Ladin in the same way as Mc. Veil was, proving his complicity in the 911 crime. The patsies were disposed-off once useless and cuмbersome essentially by the same President into three separate men.
All those three men have been engaged in the same anti-Catholic policy. Clinton in Somalia (eastern Africa) facilitated the genocide of the Christians which is now approaching the western Africa Catholic province of the late Archbishop Lefêbvre, and Clinton also, with Kosovo opened the route to Europe for the Turcs. Bush, being a Christian heretic, has created a monstrous Muslim resentment against us, the Catholics out of Protestant arrogance at playing crusader. Obama has set-up the last piece of the dominoes with Syria.
The world situation is so bad, so dangerous that only God may dissipate it. Our own vanity, at pretending to put a remedy to what is imminent makes Satan laugh at us, in that cold laughter that brings chill all the way to the bone marrow. The Beast That Never Sleep is about to get us all, in spite of our half-hearted election of a replacement king, and all our goody-two-shoes intentions.
Jack in the Box has no idea of what is about to happen. He is incapable to understand Jesus Christ, because Our Lord is God. Jack (or Jill) is like a housewife at the counter-line of a supermarket who has lately read a headline saying MITT ROMNEY IS OUR NEXT PRESIDENT.
I am clueless. I only know how how to write letters, and to pray for mercy. Last night I prayed until past 2am, until our sweet Mother in Heaven put me to sleep, in order to be fresh at typing this redaction.
 
This is my long response to Vandaler.

Lastly is our only HOPE: We know that Our Lady of the Rosary appeared in Fatima for a reason, because nothing is coincidental from heaven. We also know that Fatima was a favorite wife of the Prophet Muhammad, and that countless Muslims secretly love the Virgin, and that, if we show devotion, a spectacular victory will occur. We know also that Our Blessed Mother has ran out of strength at retaining the arm of her Son, because we do not love Him enough any longer.
 
Our Lady of Ransom, pray for us!
 
 
 

If Soros converted, that would be spectacular. Always good to have someone with money on our side, to actually fund things when need be.

On another note, are you a troll? If not, please excuse me calling you one.

Why dont you post under another nom-de-plume, haven't you ever heard this?:
.....I once heard someone say that the name for the "Jack in the Box" toy came from a reformation-era anti-Catholic put-down, where Church of Englanders would mock the Real Presence by referring to it as "Jack in the Box".....