In Sunday sermon, Minnesota priest called Muslim immigrants a threat.

Note two things.

First, how quickly CAIR comes out with its statement condemning what was said during a Holy Mass sermon essentially open to all.  Consider the irony that most (read: all) mosques will not let any 'infidels' admission on premises, let alone listen to their imams, so no corollary exists for anyone to make a similar claim against CAIR.

Second, the effeminate response of the Archbishop.  I will go out on a limb and predict that the this priest is basically toast.  Adios, padre. Meanwhile, in the same archdiocese, the Archbishop has done absolutely nothing to the priest who allowed the scandal of providing the pulpit to ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ partners.

First of all, why would any one ( not a moslem) CARE about what CAIR says? Does the average Christian or any normal thinking American these days really give a crap about what bunch of mud-slimes have to say about anything in this country?


The answer is a resounding NO! And we all know it.


But here's the problem, why are moslems even relevant in this country to begin with? Who made them relevant? Why is this country all of the sudden in the last thirty or so years being flooded with so many of these desert rats and goat-herders who follow some pedophile "prophet" while they engage in bestiality? Just WHO let them all in to begin with?


You know who or should I say you know Jєω.  Jєω as in Emanuel Celler  ( and his tribe) and the 1965 Hart-Cellar Immigration Act that began the  blatant anti Western (White) immigration from Christian Europe and opened the floodgates to every other non Christian, non-European immigrants around the world to pollute the New World with every Afro-Asian-Arab pagan or infidel they could muster to breakdown the base of this country while diluting the racial/ethnic makeup in the process. That's what the Jєω does, that's why moslems are all of the sudden "popular" or relevant in the U.S. today. Nobody ever cared what a moslem thinks in America, no one give a crap. Matter of fact, NOBODY WANTED THEM HERE TO BEGIN WITH.


But no, Jєωs said you HAVE TO TAKE THEM. Now, they'll try and take over. Just like they're doing in Europe. Just like they did in once former Christian lands like in Turkey, Syria Lebanon in the mideast. Even Iran (Persia) was a great civilization before these slimy scuмmie muzzies began to pollute and "convert" ( see submit or die) the indigenous peoples of those organic cultures. Islam is nothing but a pestilence that needs to be exterminated out of your culture or you and the culture dies.
But we never had a "moslem" problem until we had a Jєω problem. Islam is a symptom, Jєωs are the disease.


Second. The fαɢɢօt N.O. "bishop" is just example of where the "church" is at these days, especially in the hierarchy, they're pathetic. Them and all their "tolerance" nonsense. Of course, tolerance need only apply when  it panders to every other Jєω, heretic, apostate, deviant and pedophile like this fαɢɢօt bishop. These queers in collars are the very thing that has chased all the normal men out of the church or even Christianity in the last 50 or so years. What kind of any masculine dude would even think of stepping foot in a "catholic" church today with the fαɢɢօts and kiddie-diddlers leading the Mass?
I'll tell you, none.

And until more brave priests like this one and strong men in this country step up against the fαɢs, muzzies and Jєωs destroying this country and the Church, it's only going to get worse, not better. God help us.

They believe in the same God in the same way that the Jєωs believe in the same God that the Catholic Church believes in according to St Justin.  

You either have no clue about Islam or Catholicism or Jєωs at all. My guess is probably all three.


Or you do and are just a straight up usurper.

So you recognized that to hate Jesus is to contradict the Islamic religion.

What do you mean "hate"? They don't recognize him as God, just a prophet. Which like I posted above is borderline retarded.


Only a child would use the word "hate" applying to something they didn't believe in.

But then again, look what I'm dealing with when  answering your posts half the time.

And they look to behead you with great esteem. Maybe you should go down to your local mosque and try "converting" as many as you can before they do just that. I wonder pooch, do you "pray" and try to convert "antisemites" and Islamophobes such as myself as well? Nah, didn't think so. Most liberals and leftists, "christian" or not, are the biggest bunch of phonys and liars out there , there is.

If they behead me then I will go directly to Heaven. What a great joy to die for the name of Christ.
I will pray for them and their conversion. I will pray for the children that they may love Jesus in His real presence in the Blessed Sacrament.
I will pray for you that God may bless you in the way that may give Him the greatest glory. 
  

How can someone be a "prophet" and claim he was God and still be recognized as "important" in a religion that has no Trinity?


That just defies all sound logic and reason.


Then again, we're dealing with moslems, not very sane or logical people. Nor are those that defend them.

There again you prove my point. There is no logic in Islam. That is why I pray for their conversion to the Catholic Faith.  

I would add to that list, the Protestants.  If there's one things that unites just about every one of the 33,000+ sects of Protestanism, it's their hatred of the Catholic Church.

I will join you in praying and working for the conversion of the Protestants. 
 

There again you prove my point. There is no logic in Islam.

From Dictionary.com: eteem--favorable opinion or judgment; respect or regard.

Earlier you stated that you "...look with esteem to the Muslims."  How does one look with esteem to those who lack any logic?

So it's no longer called a sermon even in the salt-of-the-earth Midwest U.S.A.  Vatican II, I suppose.

I always was taught that a homily, by its nature, is about the scripture readings of the mass or it can also, actually, be about a liturgical text. Thus, it could be about the opening collect or other mass prayers, either from the ordinary or propers of the Mass.  A sermon  is not so specific and can be on any spiritual topic
 
 So that’s why it’s the “Sermon on the Mount”, not the “Homily on the Hilltop”!