Author Topic: Michael Jackson practically canonized (Read 3184 times)

roscoe · « **Reply #30 on:** July 12, 2009, 02:21:49 AM »

Michael jackson was a child molester-- his estate can sue me if they please.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #31 on:** July 12, 2009, 10:57:45 AM »

Jackson paid out $15 million dollars to that boy, 13 years old at the time of his s

Fifteen million dollars.

http://www.radaronline.com/sites/default/files/jacksoncourtdocs3cc.pdf

Rash? Calumny? What game are you playing, Alex?

I have every right to call grown men who have unsupervised sleepovers with boys sharing their bedroom and snuggling child molesters.

Yep, I do. Go read up on the sermons of the Cure D'Ars.

Don't give me that NAMBLA -inspired nonsense.

Alex · « **Reply #32 on:** July 12, 2009, 04:30:45 PM »

The payoff is not proof of his guilt. He could have paid the settlement to save himself a big headache and public humiliaton. 15 million is not as much to him as it is to us. Having members of my family who are millionaires, they have used money to take care of a big headache instead of fight back.

I'm getting tired of arguing with you. Why don't you go ask a priest who is solid in his moral theology whether you can publicly label a man a child molester merely on speculation and not on any evidence. And don't forget to tell the priest that the jurors who had all the evidence and testimony before them (unlike you) found him not guilty - not even undecided, which would have been a hung jury, but not guilty.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #33 on:** July 12, 2009, 04:42:02 PM »

Quote from: Alex

I'm getting tired of arguing with you.

Because you are in over your head with the NAMBLA mentality.

Why don't YOU go ask a priest if you can have a sleepover with a 13-year-old boy and snuggle with him?

Alex · « **Reply #34 on:** July 12, 2009, 11:21:43 PM »

Quote from: Elizabeth

Because you are in over your head with the NAMBLA mentality.

Why don't YOU go ask a priest if you can have a sleepover with a 13-year-old boy and snuggle with him?

You are unbelieveable! Why do you keep evading the issue?!

Let me break it down to you in simple terms.

When you go to the priest:

1) Don't ask him whether it was OK for MJ to have sleepovers with boys.

2) Don't ask him whether MJ was a bad influence with his crotch grabbing.

3) Don't ask him whether it was OK for him to wear make-up.

4) Don't ask him whether he was a bad father by dangling his son over the balcony.

Ask the priest this, and only this (are you reading very carefully now):

ASK THE PRIEST WHETHER IT IS OK TO PUBLICLY CALL MJ A CHILD MOLESTER (WHEN YOU OR ANYONE ELSE HAS NO EVIDENCE TO PROVE THIS FACT). AND WHETHER DOING SO WOULD BE THE SIN OF RASH JUDGEMENT AND CALUMNY.

Let me repeat so it can sink in.

ASK THE PRIEST WHETHER IT IS OK TO PUBLICLY CALL MJ A CHILD MOLESTER (WHEN YOU OR ANYONE ELSE HAS NO EVIDENCE TO PROVE THIS FACT).AND WHETHER DOING SO WOULD BE THE SIN OF RASH JUDGEMENT AND CALUMNY.

I asked a priest already and he said that what you are doing is unChristianly behavior. Now you go to a priest and ask him the same thing.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #35 on:** July 13, 2009, 08:52:04 AM »

Grown man+ sleepover with young boys+shared bedroom + snuggling+accusation by boy=child molestation.

Let's see the name and phone number of the priest who says I am being unChristian, please.