Is this Bp. Williamson's stance as well?

As far as I know, His Excellency has not red-lighted attending SSPX chapels.

A valid point, isn't it?

You're very fortunate.

We were not so fortunate... our mission was told that we must sudmit, in principle, to the proposed conditions of the  General Chapter in 2012. Unfortunately, we had to decline and now we are on very meager rations provided by others.

No, I don't agree with +W on everything, but I'm not all that concerned that I don't agree on everything. I don't like that he bought that mansion on the east coast of the U.S., but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.

Bishop Williamson didn't make a general statement that the Novus Ordo nourishes our faith. He stipulated that trads know better, and that they should avoid the Novus Ordo, and he was speaking specifically to a particular woman and her situation when he stated that. I don't have a problem with the circuмstances in which he said it.

I was amused by something that he said just before he answered the woman's question. He said something like...." I know that this going to sound like trad heresy," or something to that effect. What I like about Bishop Williamson is that he says what he thinks, and not necessarily what people want to hear.

No, I don't agree with +W on everything, but I'm not all that concerned that I don't agree on everything. I don't like that he bought that mansion on the east coast of the U.S., but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.

Bishop Williamson didn't make a general statement that the Novus Ordo nourishes our faith. He stipulated that trads know better, and that they should avoid the Novus Ordo, and he was speaking specifically to a particular woman and her situation when he stated that. I don't have a problem with the circuмstances in which he said it.

I was amused by something that he said just before he answered the woman's question. He said something like...." I know that this going to sound like trad heresy," or something to that effect. What I like about Bishop Williamson is that he says what he thinks, and not necessarily what people want to hear.

But he was right it is an untenable position for a Traditional Catholic to hold. If what he went on to say is true then there has been no need or justification for the SSPX, the consecrations or any of it.  But, the SSPX has always been compromised on this issue, the only problem is a lot of Traditionals were under the mistaken impression that the SSPX was really opposed to the council and the New Mass. So the shock wasn't in what he said but that Traditionals woke up to what he was saying.
In these times, we cannot hope for perfection in clerics, we can only appreciate validity where it is found and try to ignore the rest.

Ha, Cheers back mate.  :cheers: Yes, by all means, don't forget the pecan pie. 

Ah, the pecan pie. Truth be told, my wife is an outstanding cook. All her recipes are made mostly from her long years engaging in the art. And it is an art. She adds spices to dishes not from recipes from experience. That's all I can say. Her spaghetti sauce is, indeed, a work of art.

Historically, Bishop Williamson has been very weak on the question of Mass attendance. While Bishop Tissier has been strong.